Current drugs against the influenza A virus (IAV) act by inhibiting viral neuraminidase (NA) enzymes responsible for the release of budding virions from sialoglycans on infected cells. Here, we describe an approach focused on a search for inhibitors that reinforce the protective functions of mucosal barriers that trap viruses en route to the target cells. We have generated mimetics of sialo-glycoproteins that insert into the viral envelope to provide a well-defined mucus-like environment encapsulating the virus. By introducing this barrier, which the virus must breach using its NA enzymes to infect a host cell, into a screening platform, we have been able to identify compounds that provide significant protection against IAV infection. This approach may facilitate the discovery of potent new IAV prophylactics among compounds with NA activities too weak to emerge from traditional drug screens.
Current drugs against the influenza A virus (IAV) act by inhibiting viral neuraminidase (NA) enzymes responsible for the release of budding virions from sialoglycans on infected cells. Here, we describe an approach focused on a search for inhibitors that reinforce the protective functions of mucosal barriers that trap viruses en route to the target cells. We have generated mimetics of sialo-glycoproteins that insert into the viral envelope to provide a well-defined mucus-like environment encapsulating the virus. By introducing this barrier, which the virus must breach using its NA enzymes to infect a host cell, into a screening platform, we have been able to identify compounds that provide significant protection against IAV infection. This approach may facilitate the discovery of potent new IAV prophylactics among compounds with NA activities too weak to emerge from traditional drug screens.
The influenza A virus (IAV)
causes periodic pandemic outbreaks worldwide with substantial mortality
and economic cost.[1,2] While powerful in combating IAV,
vaccines rely heavily on the correct prediction of candidate pandemic
strains. Small molecule antivirals offer a more general alternative
for rapid deployment during outbreaks.[3−5] Currently approved IAV
drugs (i.e., oseltamivir,[6] zanamavir,[7] peramivir,[8] and laninamivir[9]) target viral neuraminidases (NAs),[10,11] which are sialic acid-cleaving enzymes required for releasing budding
virions from infected host cells and for preventing virion aggregation.[12]Despite their usefulness, these anti-IAV drugs suffer from emerging
viral resistance[13] and cross-reactivity
with humanneuraminidases (Neu2 and Neu3).[14,15] While the former can be addressed with new classes of structurally
distinct NA inhibitors, current medicinal chemistry approaches focus
on generating potent inhibitors, whose off-target activity against
closely related human enzymes can be difficult to manage. Here, we
describe an alternate strategy for the identification of IAV prophylactics
that bolster the protective functions of the pulmonary mucosa.IAV infection begins with the binding of viral hemagglutinin (HA)
proteins to sialic acid-carrying glycans on host cells. However, the
target tissues for IAV infection are covered with a layer of secreted
mucus that contains highly sialylated mucin glycoproteins, which can
act as viral receptor decoys that restrict viral entry (Figure A). The virus relies on its
NA enzymes to destroy sialic acid receptors on secreted mucins that
engage its HA and obstruct its path to the target cells.[12,16−18] Considering the key role of NA in facilitating the
diffusion of IAV through the mucus, compounds with only a mild inhibitory
effect on NA may effectively cause virus trapping in the mucus and
its clearance with the natural turnover of the mucosal barrier.[19,20]
Figure 1
Secreted mucus engages influenza A viruses (IAV) en route to a
host cell by presenting sialic acid glycan receptors to their hemagglutinin
proteins (A). To avoid being trapped in the mucus, IAV employs neuraminidase
(NA) enzymes to cleave sialic acids from the underlying mucin glycoproteins.
Compositionally defined synthetic mucus-like nanoenvironments constructed
around individual viruses allow for the identification of NA inhibitors
that prevent infection by reinforcing the protective function of the
mucosal barrier (B).
Secreted mucus engages influenza A viruses (IAV) en route to a
host cell by presenting sialic acidglycan receptors to their hemagglutinin
proteins (A). To avoid being trapped in the mucus, IAV employs neuraminidase
(NA) enzymes to cleave sialic acids from the underlying mucin glycoproteins.
Compositionally defined synthetic mucus-like nanoenvironments constructed
around individual viruses allow for the identification of NA inhibitors
that prevent infection by reinforcing the protective function of the
mucosal barrier (B).While conceptually intriguing, introduction of the mucosal component
into screening assays to identify new NA inhibitors capable of suppressing
IAV infection poses considerable challenges. Purified porcine mucins
can offer broad-spectrum protection against some viruses, including
IAV.[21,22] However, the effectiveness of viral inhibition
is strongly dependent on the mucin source, with commercial products
varying both in potency and cellular toxicity.[16,21]Synthetic glycopolymers, which mimic the basic architecture of
mucin glycoproteins, have a rich history as probes to evaluate the
mechanism of HA binding to multivalent sialoglycan ligands[23,24] and as IAV inhibitors.[25,26] Recently, we reported
the preparation of azide-functionalized sialoglycanpolymers for immobilization
in microarrays to analyze the effects of glycan presentation on recognition
by IAVs.[27] Although soluble glycopolymers
are known to inhibit viral entry,[25] they
may not adequately recreate the densely sialylated microenvironment
of the natural mucus. Inspired by reports of noninvasive labeling
of influenza virions utilizing the IAV’s lipid membrane envelope,[28,29] we have generated glycopolymers with a membrane-anchoring unit to
facilitate the formation of a discrete nanoscale mucus-like environment
proximal to individual virions. Such “nanobarriers”
can be used to evaluate low-activity NA inhibitors for their potential
to restrict the ability of IAV to escape from mucus and initiate infection
(Figure B).The passive insertion of lipidated glycoconjugates into membranes
has emerged as a powerful tool to engineer new components into the
cellular glycocalyx.[30−32] We have now extended this strategy to introduce mucin-mimetic
glycopolymers terminated with a phospholipid tail to the surfaces
of H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) virions (Figure ). Using RAFT polymerization, we have generated polyacrylamide
backbones with narrow chain length distributions and initiating with
the lipid1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide
(DPPE; P1/3/5) as well as with
a nonlipophilic azido-tetraethylene glycol moiety (PEG4-N3, P2/4/6). The
polymers were decorated with N-methylaminooxypropyl
side chains, which served as reactive sites for the attachment of
3′- and 6′-sialyllactose ligands for HA (P1/2 and P3/4, respectively,
in Figure ).[27] Control polymers (P5/6) were functionalized with the nonbinding glycan lactose. To facilitate
tracking of the polymers, their thiol termini were capped with an
AlexaFluor 488 (AF488) maleimide dye.
Figure 2
Mucin mimetic decoys comprise RAFT-derived glycopolymers carrying
sialyllactose or lactose glycans armed with a 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide (DPPE) lipid anchoring unit
or a hydrophilic, lipid free, azido-tetraethylene glycol (PEG4-N3) group. The mimetics were tagged with AlexaFluor488
(AF488) for characterization and imaging.
Mucin mimetic decoys comprise RAFT-derived glycopolymers carrying
sialyllactose or lactose glycans armed with a 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide (DPPE) lipid anchoring unit
or a hydrophilic, lipid free, azido-tetraethylene glycol (PEG4-N3) group. The mimetics were tagged with AlexaFluor488
(AF488) for characterization and imaging.To generate a discrete mucus-like environment, H1N1 (A/PR/8/34)
viruses were incubated with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose (P1) or lactose (P5) glycopolymers, and membrane
incorporation was examined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
after immunostaining with an anti-AF488 antibody conjugated to gold
nanoparticles (AuNPs, Figure ). We observed higher levels of membrane incorporation for
the sialylated polymers over those containing lactose glycans (8 ±
4 AuNPs/virion for P1 vs 4 ± 3 AuNPs/virion for P5). This enhancement is likely due to precoordination of P1 through binding to the viral HA and NA proteins. The lesser
incorporation of the lipid-free polymers P2 and P6 (3 ± 3 vs 1 ± 2 AuNPs/virion, respectively) indicates
the contributions from the membrane anchors to the surface remodeling
process.
Figure 3
Incorporation of AF488-labeled decoys into the membranes of H1N1
virions was visualized by TEM after immunostaining with an anti-AF488
antibody conjugated with gold nanoparticles (Ab-AuNP, micrograph).
The lipid anchor in polymers P1 and P5 promoted
virion encapsulation, with precoordination of the sialoglycans in
polymers P1 and P2 to the viral HA proteins
providing additional enhancement (schematic and graph, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001
from Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Incorporation of AF488-labeled decoys into the membranes of H1N1
virions was visualized by TEM after immunostaining with an anti-AF488
antibody conjugated with gold nanoparticles (Ab-AuNP, micrograph).
The lipid anchor in polymers P1 and P5 promoted
virion encapsulation, with precoordination of the sialoglycans in
polymers P1 and P2 to the viral HA proteins
providing additional enhancement (schematic and graph, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001
from Tukey’s multiple comparison test).In the upper airways, the secreted mucus shields underlying epithelial
cells from IAV infection by trapping the virus with sialylated mucin
decoys, which are constantly cleared by mucociliary motion.[33] Inhibition of viral NA with oseltamivir can
enhance this protective effect by impeding virus release from the
mucus.[16] To replicate this mechanism in
an in vitro assay, we treated Madin–Darby
canine kidney (MDCK) cells adhered on a 96-well plate with purified
sialylated human salivary mucins (HSM) followed by inoculation with
H1N1 (A/PR/8/34). After washing of excess HSM and virus, the cells
were cultured, and H1N1 propagation was quantified after 24 h by measuring
NA activity in the culture media.[34,35] We observed
successful IAV infection with 1.5–3.0 nmol of HSM sialic acid
per well (Figure S11). In contrast, when
the virus is first preincubated with oseltamivir (1 μM), significantly
less virus activity is detected in the cell media (Figure S11). Thus, inhibition of NA activity impairs the ability
of IAV to escape from the HSM layer and to initiate infection.In analogy to the HSM, the mucin mimetics also provided protection
against IAV infection in the presence of oseltamivir in our assay
(Figure ). The MDCK
cells were similarly inoculated with the virus in the presence of
the mucin mimetic decoys (17.5 nmol sialic acid/well) with or without
oseltamivir (1 μM). Both 3′-sialyllactosepolymers P1 and P2 significantly reduced IAV infection
with oseltamivir. However, P1 reduced infection to a
much greater extent relative to P2 (∼80% vs ∼35%,
respectively), indicating the benefits of physically confining the
virus within a mucus-like nanoenvironment. As expected, lactosepolymers P5 and P6, lacking sialic acid binding sites
for either HA or NA, had no effect on infection (Figure ). Polymers P3 and P4 carrying 6′-sialyllactose glycans, which
engage HA proteins of H1N1 A/PR/8/34[27] but
are not cleaved by its NA enzymes that preferentially hydrolyze α2–3
sialic acid glycosidic linkages,[36,37] provided no
protection against infection in the presence of oseltamivir (Figure S12). The protective effect of the mucus-like
nanoenvironment was also borne out in IAV hemagglutination experiments
showing that the addition of oseltamivir (1 μM) improves the
inhibitory capacity of the lipidated 3′-sialyllactoseglycopolymer P1 by ∼16-fold (Tables S6–8 and S11). The lipidated mucin mimetics cannot differentiate
between viral and cellular membranes, and, as expected, some membrane
incorporation was observed in cells treated with the lipidated glycopolymers
(Figure S13). However, the presence of
these polymers on the cell surface does not significantly affect IAVinfection (Figure S14).
Figure 4
Sialoglycan decoys provide protection against IAV infection in
the presence of the NA inhibitor oseltamivir. Relative infection was
determined as a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation
with or without oseltamivir. Anchoring of decoy P1 into
the viral membrane via its lipid tail provides a robust mucus-like
barrier difficult for the virus to breach in the presence of the inhibitor
(*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤
0.01).
Sialoglycan decoys provide protection against IAV infection in
the presence of the NA inhibitor oseltamivir. Relative infection was
determined as a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation
with or without oseltamivir. Anchoring of decoy P1 into
the viral membrane via its lipid tail provides a robust mucus-like
barrier difficult for the virus to breach in the presence of the inhibitor
(*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤
0.01).Having established that the mucin-mimetic decoys can prevent infection,
we next sought to introduce them into a screening platform to identify
new NA inhibitors that prevent IAV infection by reinforcing the protective
function of the mucosal barrier. We focused on a small panel of flavonoids
known to inhibit NA (Figure ). We hypothesized that, although their low inhibitory activities
(IC50 ≈ 102 μM compared to ∼1
nM for oseltamivir)[38,39] would likely disqualify them
as hits in traditional screens, flavonoids may provide sufficient
protection against IAV by enhancing virus trapping in the clearable
mucus.
Figure 5
Flavonoids with known NA activity were tested for their ability
to inhibit infection of MDCK cells by H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) remodelled
with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose polymer decoy P1. Relative infection refers to a ratio of viral activity measured
24 h after inoculation with or without inhibitor. Isoquercitrin, a
weak NA inhibitor, provided a similar extent of protection against
IAV infection compared to the much more potent inhibitor oseltamivir
(*p ≤ 0.05).
Flavonoids with known NA activity were tested for their ability
to inhibit infection of MDCK cells by H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) remodelled
with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose polymer decoy P1. Relative infection refers to a ratio of viral activity measured
24 h after inoculation with or without inhibitor. Isoquercitrin, a
weak NA inhibitor, provided a similar extent of protection against
IAV infection compared to the much more potent inhibitor oseltamivir
(*p ≤ 0.05).To test their ability to inhibit IAV, flavonoids 1–7 (0.1 mg/mL) as well as oseltamivir (1 μM)
were incubated with the virus. MDCK cells were inoculated with the
virus-inhibitor mixture with the lipidated glycopolymers, and washed.
Fresh media was added and virus propagation was quantified after 24
h. As expected, oseltamivir reduced IAV infection by ∼60–70%
in the presence of P1 compared to PBS (Figure ). Among the flavonoids, several
compounds exhibited some protection against IAV with isoquercitrin
(3) inhibiting infection by ∼50%. Isoquercitrin
also enhanced glycopolymer-mediated inhibition in an IAV agglutination
assay (Tables S9–S11). This indicates
that despite its poor NA activity, isoquercitrin can provide protection
against IAV at levels approaching those of oseltamivir, a much more
potent inhibitor.In summary, we report a conceptually novel drug-screening platform
to identify inhibitors of viral NA to prevent the release of virions
from sialylated mucins in mucosal barriers and, thereby, reduce infection
of underlying cells. Using synthetic, membrane-anchored glycopolymer
mimetics of mucin glycoproteins, we assembled a mucus-like environment
at the virus surface with tunable size and glycan composition. These
discrete nanobarriers can be used to identify small molecules that
block viral escape from mucus and prevent infection. This technique
is general and can be broadened beyond the small group of test compounds
employed in this proof-of-concept study to identify potential new
prophylactic antivirals among weak NA inhibitors that otherwise might
have been overlooked in traditional drug screening assays.
Authors: Leonard M G Chavas; Ryuichi Kato; Nobuhiro Suzuki; Mark von Itzstein; Maretta C Mann; Robin J Thomson; Jeffrey C Dyason; Jennifer McKimm-Breschkin; Paola Fusi; Cristina Tringali; Bruno Venerando; Guido Tettamanti; Eugenio Monti; Soichi Wakatsuki Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Elizabeth M Hadac; Mark J Federspiel; Evgeny Chernyy; Alexander Tuzikov; Elena Korchagina; Nicolai V Bovin; Stephen Russell; Stephen M Henry Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Abigail Pulsipher; Matthew E Griffin; Shannon E Stone; Joshua M Brown; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Corleone S Delaveris; Elizabeth R Webster; Steven M Banik; Steven G Boxer; Carolyn R Bertozzi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 11.205