Literature DB >> 27800553

Synthetic Mucus Nanobarriers for Identification of Glycan-Dependent Primary Influenza A Infection Inhibitors.

Miriam Cohen1, Hooman P Senaati1, Christopher J Fisher1, Mia L Huang1, Pascal Gagneux1, Kamil Godula1.   

Abstract

Current drugs against the influenza A virus (IAV) act by inhibiting viral neuraminidase (NA) enzymes responsible for the release of budding virions from sialoglycans on infected cells. Here, we describe an approach focused on a search for inhibitors that reinforce the protective functions of mucosal barriers that trap viruses en route to the target cells. We have generated mimetics of sialo-glycoproteins that insert into the viral envelope to provide a well-defined mucus-like environment encapsulating the virus. By introducing this barrier, which the virus must breach using its NA enzymes to infect a host cell, into a screening platform, we have been able to identify compounds that provide significant protection against IAV infection. This approach may facilitate the discovery of potent new IAV prophylactics among compounds with NA activities too weak to emerge from traditional drug screens.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27800553      PMCID: PMC5084083          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


The influenza A virus (IAV) causes periodic pandemic outbreaks worldwide with substantial mortality and economic cost.[1,2] While powerful in combating IAV, vaccines rely heavily on the correct prediction of candidate pandemic strains. Small molecule antivirals offer a more general alternative for rapid deployment during outbreaks.[3−5] Currently approved IAV drugs (i.e., oseltamivir,[6] zanamavir,[7] peramivir,[8] and laninamivir[9]) target viral neuraminidases (NAs),[10,11] which are sialic acid-cleaving enzymes required for releasing budding virions from infected host cells and for preventing virion aggregation.[12] Despite their usefulness, these anti-IAV drugs suffer from emerging viral resistance[13] and cross-reactivity with human neuraminidases (Neu2 and Neu3).[14,15] While the former can be addressed with new classes of structurally distinct NA inhibitors, current medicinal chemistry approaches focus on generating potent inhibitors, whose off-target activity against closely related human enzymes can be difficult to manage. Here, we describe an alternate strategy for the identification of IAV prophylactics that bolster the protective functions of the pulmonary mucosa. IAV infection begins with the binding of viral hemagglutinin (HA) proteins to sialic acid-carrying glycans on host cells. However, the target tissues for IAV infection are covered with a layer of secreted mucus that contains highly sialylated mucin glycoproteins, which can act as viral receptor decoys that restrict viral entry (Figure A). The virus relies on its NA enzymes to destroy sialic acid receptors on secreted mucins that engage its HA and obstruct its path to the target cells.[12,16−18] Considering the key role of NA in facilitating the diffusion of IAV through the mucus, compounds with only a mild inhibitory effect on NA may effectively cause virus trapping in the mucus and its clearance with the natural turnover of the mucosal barrier.[19,20]
Figure 1

Secreted mucus engages influenza A viruses (IAV) en route to a host cell by presenting sialic acid glycan receptors to their hemagglutinin proteins (A). To avoid being trapped in the mucus, IAV employs neuraminidase (NA) enzymes to cleave sialic acids from the underlying mucin glycoproteins. Compositionally defined synthetic mucus-like nanoenvironments constructed around individual viruses allow for the identification of NA inhibitors that prevent infection by reinforcing the protective function of the mucosal barrier (B).

Secreted mucus engages influenza A viruses (IAV) en route to a host cell by presenting sialic acid glycan receptors to their hemagglutinin proteins (A). To avoid being trapped in the mucus, IAV employs neuraminidase (NA) enzymes to cleave sialic acids from the underlying mucin glycoproteins. Compositionally defined synthetic mucus-like nanoenvironments constructed around individual viruses allow for the identification of NA inhibitors that prevent infection by reinforcing the protective function of the mucosal barrier (B). While conceptually intriguing, introduction of the mucosal component into screening assays to identify new NA inhibitors capable of suppressing IAV infection poses considerable challenges. Purified porcine mucins can offer broad-spectrum protection against some viruses, including IAV.[21,22] However, the effectiveness of viral inhibition is strongly dependent on the mucin source, with commercial products varying both in potency and cellular toxicity.[16,21] Synthetic glycopolymers, which mimic the basic architecture of mucin glycoproteins, have a rich history as probes to evaluate the mechanism of HA binding to multivalent sialoglycan ligands[23,24] and as IAV inhibitors.[25,26] Recently, we reported the preparation of azide-functionalized sialoglycan polymers for immobilization in microarrays to analyze the effects of glycan presentation on recognition by IAVs.[27] Although soluble glycopolymers are known to inhibit viral entry,[25] they may not adequately recreate the densely sialylated microenvironment of the natural mucus. Inspired by reports of noninvasive labeling of influenza virions utilizing the IAV’s lipid membrane envelope,[28,29] we have generated glycopolymers with a membrane-anchoring unit to facilitate the formation of a discrete nanoscale mucus-like environment proximal to individual virions. Such “nanobarriers” can be used to evaluate low-activity NA inhibitors for their potential to restrict the ability of IAV to escape from mucus and initiate infection (Figure B). The passive insertion of lipidated glycoconjugates into membranes has emerged as a powerful tool to engineer new components into the cellular glycocalyx.[30−32] We have now extended this strategy to introduce mucin-mimetic glycopolymers terminated with a phospholipid tail to the surfaces of H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) virions (Figure ). Using RAFT polymerization, we have generated polyacrylamide backbones with narrow chain length distributions and initiating with the lipid 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide (DPPE; P1/3/5) as well as with a nonlipophilic azido-tetraethylene glycol moiety (PEG4-N3, P2/4/6). The polymers were decorated with N-methylaminooxypropyl side chains, which served as reactive sites for the attachment of 3′- and 6′-sialyllactose ligands for HA (P1/2 and P3/4, respectively, in Figure ).[27] Control polymers (P5/6) were functionalized with the nonbinding glycan lactose. To facilitate tracking of the polymers, their thiol termini were capped with an AlexaFluor 488 (AF488) maleimide dye.
Figure 2

Mucin mimetic decoys comprise RAFT-derived glycopolymers carrying sialyllactose or lactose glycans armed with a 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide (DPPE) lipid anchoring unit or a hydrophilic, lipid free, azido-tetraethylene glycol (PEG4-N3) group. The mimetics were tagged with AlexaFluor488 (AF488) for characterization and imaging.

Mucin mimetic decoys comprise RAFT-derived glycopolymers carrying sialyllactose or lactose glycans armed with a 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethylamide (DPPE) lipid anchoring unit or a hydrophilic, lipid free, azido-tetraethylene glycol (PEG4-N3) group. The mimetics were tagged with AlexaFluor488 (AF488) for characterization and imaging. To generate a discrete mucus-like environment, H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) viruses were incubated with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose (P1) or lactose (P5) glycopolymers, and membrane incorporation was examined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) after immunostaining with an anti-AF488 antibody conjugated to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs, Figure ). We observed higher levels of membrane incorporation for the sialylated polymers over those containing lactose glycans (8 ± 4 AuNPs/virion for P1 vs 4 ± 3 AuNPs/virion for P5). This enhancement is likely due to precoordination of P1 through binding to the viral HA and NA proteins. The lesser incorporation of the lipid-free polymers P2 and P6 (3 ± 3 vs 1 ± 2 AuNPs/virion, respectively) indicates the contributions from the membrane anchors to the surface remodeling process.
Figure 3

Incorporation of AF488-labeled decoys into the membranes of H1N1 virions was visualized by TEM after immunostaining with an anti-AF488 antibody conjugated with gold nanoparticles (Ab-AuNP, micrograph). The lipid anchor in polymers P1 and P5 promoted virion encapsulation, with precoordination of the sialoglycans in polymers P1 and P2 to the viral HA proteins providing additional enhancement (schematic and graph, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 from Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

Incorporation of AF488-labeled decoys into the membranes of H1N1 virions was visualized by TEM after immunostaining with an anti-AF488 antibody conjugated with gold nanoparticles (Ab-AuNP, micrograph). The lipid anchor in polymers P1 and P5 promoted virion encapsulation, with precoordination of the sialoglycans in polymers P1 and P2 to the viral HA proteins providing additional enhancement (schematic and graph, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001 from Tukey’s multiple comparison test). In the upper airways, the secreted mucus shields underlying epithelial cells from IAV infection by trapping the virus with sialylated mucin decoys, which are constantly cleared by mucociliary motion.[33] Inhibition of viral NA with oseltamivir can enhance this protective effect by impeding virus release from the mucus.[16] To replicate this mechanism in an in vitro assay, we treated Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells adhered on a 96-well plate with purified sialylated human salivary mucins (HSM) followed by inoculation with H1N1 (A/PR/8/34). After washing of excess HSM and virus, the cells were cultured, and H1N1 propagation was quantified after 24 h by measuring NA activity in the culture media.[34,35] We observed successful IAV infection with 1.5–3.0 nmol of HSM sialic acid per well (Figure S11). In contrast, when the virus is first preincubated with oseltamivir (1 μM), significantly less virus activity is detected in the cell media (Figure S11). Thus, inhibition of NA activity impairs the ability of IAV to escape from the HSM layer and to initiate infection. In analogy to the HSM, the mucin mimetics also provided protection against IAV infection in the presence of oseltamivir in our assay (Figure ). The MDCK cells were similarly inoculated with the virus in the presence of the mucin mimetic decoys (17.5 nmol sialic acid/well) with or without oseltamivir (1 μM). Both 3′-sialyllactose polymers P1 and P2 significantly reduced IAV infection with oseltamivir. However, P1 reduced infection to a much greater extent relative to P2 (∼80% vs ∼35%, respectively), indicating the benefits of physically confining the virus within a mucus-like nanoenvironment. As expected, lactose polymers P5 and P6, lacking sialic acid binding sites for either HA or NA, had no effect on infection (Figure ). Polymers P3 and P4 carrying 6′-sialyllactose glycans, which engage HA proteins of H1N1 A/PR/8/34[27] but are not cleaved by its NA enzymes that preferentially hydrolyze α2–3 sialic acid glycosidic linkages,[36,37] provided no protection against infection in the presence of oseltamivir (Figure S12). The protective effect of the mucus-like nanoenvironment was also borne out in IAV hemagglutination experiments showing that the addition of oseltamivir (1 μM) improves the inhibitory capacity of the lipidated 3′-sialyllactose glycopolymer P1 by ∼16-fold (Tables S6–8 and S11). The lipidated mucin mimetics cannot differentiate between viral and cellular membranes, and, as expected, some membrane incorporation was observed in cells treated with the lipidated glycopolymers (Figure S13). However, the presence of these polymers on the cell surface does not significantly affect IAV infection (Figure S14).
Figure 4

Sialoglycan decoys provide protection against IAV infection in the presence of the NA inhibitor oseltamivir. Relative infection was determined as a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation with or without oseltamivir. Anchoring of decoy P1 into the viral membrane via its lipid tail provides a robust mucus-like barrier difficult for the virus to breach in the presence of the inhibitor (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01).

Sialoglycan decoys provide protection against IAV infection in the presence of the NA inhibitor oseltamivir. Relative infection was determined as a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation with or without oseltamivir. Anchoring of decoy P1 into the viral membrane via its lipid tail provides a robust mucus-like barrier difficult for the virus to breach in the presence of the inhibitor (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01). Having established that the mucin-mimetic decoys can prevent infection, we next sought to introduce them into a screening platform to identify new NA inhibitors that prevent IAV infection by reinforcing the protective function of the mucosal barrier. We focused on a small panel of flavonoids known to inhibit NA (Figure ). We hypothesized that, although their low inhibitory activities (IC50 ≈ 102 μM compared to ∼1 nM for oseltamivir)[38,39] would likely disqualify them as hits in traditional screens, flavonoids may provide sufficient protection against IAV by enhancing virus trapping in the clearable mucus.
Figure 5

Flavonoids with known NA activity were tested for their ability to inhibit infection of MDCK cells by H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) remodelled with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose polymer decoy P1. Relative infection refers to a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation with or without inhibitor. Isoquercitrin, a weak NA inhibitor, provided a similar extent of protection against IAV infection compared to the much more potent inhibitor oseltamivir (*p ≤ 0.05).

Flavonoids with known NA activity were tested for their ability to inhibit infection of MDCK cells by H1N1 (A/PR/8/34) remodelled with lipidated 3′-sialyllactose polymer decoy P1. Relative infection refers to a ratio of viral activity measured 24 h after inoculation with or without inhibitor. Isoquercitrin, a weak NA inhibitor, provided a similar extent of protection against IAV infection compared to the much more potent inhibitor oseltamivir (*p ≤ 0.05). To test their ability to inhibit IAV, flavonoids 1–7 (0.1 mg/mL) as well as oseltamivir (1 μM) were incubated with the virus. MDCK cells were inoculated with the virus-inhibitor mixture with the lipidated glycopolymers, and washed. Fresh media was added and virus propagation was quantified after 24 h. As expected, oseltamivir reduced IAV infection by ∼60–70% in the presence of P1 compared to PBS (Figure ). Among the flavonoids, several compounds exhibited some protection against IAV with isoquercitrin (3) inhibiting infection by ∼50%. Isoquercitrin also enhanced glycopolymer-mediated inhibition in an IAV agglutination assay (Tables S9–S11). This indicates that despite its poor NA activity, isoquercitrin can provide protection against IAV at levels approaching those of oseltamivir, a much more potent inhibitor. In summary, we report a conceptually novel drug-screening platform to identify inhibitors of viral NA to prevent the release of virions from sialylated mucins in mucosal barriers and, thereby, reduce infection of underlying cells. Using synthetic, membrane-anchored glycopolymer mimetics of mucin glycoproteins, we assembled a mucus-like environment at the virus surface with tunable size and glycan composition. These discrete nanobarriers can be used to identify small molecules that block viral escape from mucus and prevent infection. This technique is general and can be broadened beyond the small group of test compounds employed in this proof-of-concept study to identify potential new prophylactic antivirals among weak NA inhibitors that otherwise might have been overlooked in traditional drug screening assays.
  38 in total

1.  Limited inhibitory effects of oseltamivir and zanamivir on human sialidases.

Authors:  Keiko Hata; Koichi Koseki; Kazunori Yamaguchi; Setsuko Moriya; Yasuo Suzuki; Sangchai Yingsakmongkon; Go Hirai; Mikiko Sodeoka; Mark von Itzstein; Taeko Miyagi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Complexity in influenza virus targeted drug design: interaction with human sialidases.

Authors:  Leonard M G Chavas; Ryuichi Kato; Nobuhiro Suzuki; Mark von Itzstein; Maretta C Mann; Robin J Thomson; Jeffrey C Dyason; Jennifer McKimm-Breschkin; Paola Fusi; Cristina Tringali; Bruno Venerando; Guido Tettamanti; Eugenio Monti; Soichi Wakatsuki
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Recent advances in neuraminidase inhibitor development as anti-influenza drugs.

Authors:  Enguang Feng; Deju Ye; Jian Li; Dengyou Zhang; Jinfang Wang; Fei Zhao; Rolf Hilgenfeld; Mingyue Zheng; Hualiang Jiang; Hong Liu
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Mucin biopolymers as broad-spectrum antiviral agents.

Authors:  Oliver Lieleg; Corinna Lieleg; Jesse Bloom; Christopher B Buck; Katharina Ribbeck
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Fluorescein and radiolabeled Function-Spacer-Lipid constructs allow for simple in vitro and in vivo bioimaging of enveloped virions.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hadac; Mark J Federspiel; Evgeny Chernyy; Alexander Tuzikov; Elena Korchagina; Nicolai V Bovin; Stephen Russell; Stephen M Henry
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 6.  Systematic review of influenza resistance to the neuraminidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Kristian Thorlund; Tahany Awad; Guy Boivin; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 7.  The pathology of influenza virus infections.

Authors:  Jeffery K Taubenberger; David M Morens
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 8.  Influenza neuraminidase.

Authors:  Gillian M Air
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 9.  Clinical Implications of Antiviral Resistance in Influenza.

Authors:  Timothy C M Li; Martin C W Chan; Nelson Lee
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Directing neuronal signaling through cell-surface glycan engineering.

Authors:  Abigail Pulsipher; Matthew E Griffin; Shannon E Stone; Joshua M Brown; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  Membrane-tethered mucin-like polypeptides sterically inhibit binding and slow fusion kinetics of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Corleone S Delaveris; Elizabeth R Webster; Steven M Banik; Steven G Boxer; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Multivalent Sialosides: A Tool to Explore the Role of Sialic Acids in Biological Processes.

Authors:  Preeti Madhukar Chaudhary; Suraj Toraskar; Rohan Yadav; Akshay Hande; Rina-Arad Yellin; Raghavendra Kikkeri
Journal:  Chem Asian J       Date:  2019-04-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.