Literature DB >> 27800469

The Serum Changes of Neuron-Specific Enolase and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in Patients With Diffuse Axonal Injury Following Progesterone Administration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nader Shahrokhi1, Zahra Soltani2, Mohammad Khaksari3, Saeid Karamouzian4, Behshad Mofid4, Gholamreza Asadikaram5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvement of neurologic outcome in progesterone-administered patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) has been found in a recent study. Also, there has been interest in the importance of serum parameters as predictors of outcome in traumatic brain injury.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of progesterone administration on serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in clinical DAI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, the serum levels of ICAM-1 and NSE of 32 male DAI patients (18 - 60 years of age, a Glasgow coma scale of 12 or less, and admitted within 4 hours after injury) who were randomized for a controlled phase II trial of progesterone were analyzed. The analysis was performed between the control and progesterone groups at admission time, and 24 hours and six days after DAI, respectively.
RESULTS: A reduction in the serum level of ICAM-1 was noticed in the progesterone group 24 hours after the injury (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the serum level of NSE between the study groups during evaluation. At 24 hours after the injury, the level of ICAM-1 in the control group was higher than that at admission time (P < 0.05). The lowest level of NSE in the two groups was seen six days after DAI (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, progesterone administration reduced serum ICAM-1, and whereby may attenuate blood brain barrier disruption, the latter needs further investigation for confirmation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffuse Axonal Injury; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; Neuron-Specific Enolase; Progesterone; Serum

Year:  2016        PMID: 27800469      PMCID: PMC5079208          DOI: 10.5812/atr.37005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Trauma Res        ISSN: 2251-953X


1. Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability (1), and there are no currently treatments that improve clinical outcome (2). Progesterone as a reproduction-related hormone exerts anti-oxidative, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects in the nervous system (3). Experimental studies have suggested that progesterone is a promising neuroprotective agent in TBI (4-6), but analyses of phase III clinical trials with progesterone have not been shown to be successful on functional outcome (7, 8). This failure may be due to the lack of evaluating biomarkers relevant to TBI (9). Thus, the evaluation of serum markers may help the diagnosis of improvement following an intervention in a minimally invasive manner. The search for predictive markers of outcome in TBI has been begun over 20 years ago. The evaluation of biomarkers in TBI patients could help the intervention selection, and provide the prognostic information (1). Pathophysiology of TBI is a complex interplay of brain specific proteins, and cytokine-mediated immune reactions (10). Inflammation has a great role in the pathophysiology of TBI (11). Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and IL-6, which are released within minutes of the primary injury, can cause the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the brain by activating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (12). It has been shown that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration of ICAM-1 indicates tissue and blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage, giving an indication of the immunologic reaction in the injured brain (13). Also, the increase in serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) correlates with the injury of neurons (14). The neuron-specific enolase is one of its five isoenzymes of glycolytic enolase (15) and involved during the onset of neuronal activity. The neuron-specific enolase can be useful as a serum biomarker in diffuse axonal injury (DAI) (14). The inhibition of ICAM-1 expression in the injured brain has been revealed by progesterone administration at five days after experimental TBI (16). Progesterone administration led to decreasing ICAM-1 expression at 48 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (17). Progesterone treatment attenuated significantly markers of neuroinflammation in TBI rats, concomitant with reduction in neurologic impairments (18). In our previous study, progesterone-administered DAI patients showed decreasing IL-1β, and increasing IL-6 and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) in serum. Also, the serum level of malondialdehyde (MDA), as an indication of lipid peroxidation was reduced in them (19). However, the neuroprotective effect of progesterone on serum levels of NSE and ICAM-1 has not been investigated in clinical trial.

2. Objectives

The present study aimed to examine the effect of progesterone administration on serum levels of NSE and ICAM-1 in DAI patients of a randomized controlled phase II trial of progesterone. We hypothesized that modulating the pathophysiological pathways related to cerebral inflammation after TBI by progesterone is a mechanism whereby progesterone protects neurons, and improves neurologic outcome after TBI.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. The Study Patients

This study was part of a single- center blinded, randomized, controlled phase II trial of progesterone that a part of the results of trial has been published (19). The approval of the trial protocol was obtained from the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (K/92/579) prior to the commencement of the trial. The trial was registered in Iranian registry of clinical trials (www.irct.ir, CT2014042017356N1). The eligibility criteria of trial were male, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 12 or less, pure DAI using a computed tomography (CT) scan, admission within four hours after injury, and 18 to 60 years of age. The patients of trial were randomly placed in either the case (received progesterone) or control group. The trial was executed in trauma center of Kerman province. The case group received progesterone intramuscularly 1 mg/kg/12 hours for five days. All of the study patients received the standard management protocol for TBI (19). Blood samples obtained at three time points (admission, and 24 hours and six days after the study) were analyzed to measure the ICAM-1 and NSE levels (19).

3.2. The Measurement of Serum Levels of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase

The serum levels of ICAM-1 (sensitivity range 31.3 - 2000 pg/mL, R and D) and NSE (sensitivity range 0.31 - 20 ng/mL, R and D) were assessed using commercially available enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Briefly, a quantitative assay of these variables was done using the secondary antibody labeled with peroxidase and producing colored product to read in a spectrophotometer. A standard curve was prepared for any biomarker using respective standards, and the serum levels of biomarkers were determined using the respective standard curve. The serum levels of ICAM-1 and NSE were expressed as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) and nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL), respectively.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± SEM. SPSS 20 software was used to analyze data. The data normality was checked by Shapiro-Wilk’s test. The comparison of the variables among the times was performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The comparison between the two groups was performed by two independent t-tests. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. The Study Patients

No significant difference was found regarding age, injury time to randomization, severity of injury and cause of DAI between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1.

The Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Study Groups at the Admission Time

CharacteristicsControl (n = 16)Progesterone (n = 16)P Value
Age, y; mean ± SEM 30.75 ± 3.428.44 ± 1.740.84
Injury time to randomization (minute); mean ± SEM 84.81 ± 9.9369.36 ± 19.380.98
GCS (score); mean ± SEM
Total 7.75 ± 0.527.5 ± 0.550.81
Cause of DAI, No. (%) N/S
Motor vehicle15 (93.8)16 (100)
Fall0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Other1 (6.2)0 (0.0)

Abbreviations: DAI, diffuse axonal injury; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; N/S, not significant; n, number of patients.

Abbreviations: DAI, diffuse axonal injury; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; N/S, not significant; n, number of patients.

4.2. The Serum Level of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in Diffuse Axonal Injury Patients Following Progesterone Administration

The effect of progesterone on the serum level of ICAM-1 in DAI patients has shown in Table 2. No significant difference was found in the ICAM-1 level between the control and progesterone groups at the time of admission and six days after injury (P = 0.21 and P = 0.77, respectively). In contrast, 24 hours after the injury, the ICAM-1 level was reduced in the progesterone group (868.97 ± 166.54 pg/mL) compared to the control group (1422.96 ± 203.87 pg/ mL) (P < 0.05). The amount of reduction in the progesterone group in comparison with the control group was 38.95% at 24 hours after the injury. An increase in the ICAM-1 level was found in the control group at 24 hours in comparison to the admission time (P < 0.05).
Table 2.

The Effect of Progesterone on the Serum Level of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (pg/ mL) in Diffuse Axonal Injury Patients

TimesControl (n = 16) mean ± SEM, pg/ mLProgesterone (n = 16) mean ± SEM, pg/ mLP Value
Admission time 829.47 ± 93.31990.52 ± 83.20.21
24 hours after injury 1422.96 ± 203.87[a]868.97 ± 166.54[b]0.04
6 days after injury 865.81 ± 193.61939.61 ± 151.550.77

aP < 0.05 vs. admission in the control group.

bP < 0.05 vs. control group at 24 hours after the injury.

aP < 0.05 vs. admission in the control group. bP < 0.05 vs. control group at 24 hours after the injury.

4.3. The Serum Level of Neuron-Specific Enolase in Diffuse Axonal Injury Patients Following Progesterone Administration

The effect of progesterone on the serum level of NSE in DAI patients has shown in Table 3. No significant difference was found in the NSE level between the control and progesterone groups during assay (P = 0.42, P = 0.58 and P = 0.1, respectively). A significant decrease was found in the NSE level in the control and progesterone groups six days after the injury in comparison to admission and 24 h after the injury (P < 0.01).
Table 3.

The Effect of Progesterone on the Serum Level of Neuron-Specific Enolase (ng/ mL) in Diffuse Axonal Injury Patients

TimesControl (n = 16) mean ± SEM, ng/mlProgesterone (n = 16) mean ± SEM, ng/ml
Admission time 15.41 ± 0.8514.42 ± 0.88
24 hours after injury 14.83 ± 0.8714.09 ± 0.99
6 days after injury 2.14 ± 0.21[a,b]5.63 ± 1.67[a,b]

aP < 0.01 vs. admission in the control or progesterone group.

bP < 0.01 vs. 24 hours after injury in the control or progesterone group.

aP < 0.01 vs. admission in the control or progesterone group. bP < 0.01 vs. 24 hours after injury in the control or progesterone group.

5. Discussion

To our knowledge, the current study is the first study to examine the effect of progesterone administration on the serum levels of ICAM-1 and NSE in DAI patients. The main findings of this study were: 1, the serum level of ICAM-1 reduced remarkably in DAI patients following progesterone administration 24 h after injury; 2, progesterone did not change the serum level of NSE in DAI patients during evaluation. The authors of this study have begun to examine the effect of progesterone as a therapeutic agent in clinical DAI by trying to account for their experimental studies (4, 5). They have reported that progesterone administration can cause the improvement of neurologic outcome in DAI patients (19). Brain-related proteins are appeared in the systemic circulation following BBB disruption (20). Serum biomarkers in TBI are a useful means for evaluating the condition (21). Also, the assessment of TBI biomarkers improves the development of an individualized treatment (1). Studies have consistently demonstrated that progesterone, as a neurosteroid with multiple functions, modulates diverse secondary injury mechanisms in TBI, including apoptotic pathways, diffuse axonal injury, stress oxidative (4, 22), and the expression of inflammatory cytokines (3, 17). We have previously reported decreasing S100 calcium-binding protein B (S-100 B), IL-1β and MDA and increasing TGF-β1 and IL-6 in serum associated to improving neurologic outcome in progesterone-administered DAI patients (19). In the present study, the effect of progesterone administration on the serum levels of ICAM-1 and NSE in DAI patients was determined. In current study, the serum level of ICAM-1 reached to peak 24 hours after DAI and returned to the control level 6 days after DAI. Progesterone prevented the increase in ICAM-1 24 hours after DAI. The expression of IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6, and ICAM-1 in the injured brain up-regulates in TBI (16, 17). Activated astrocytes and microglia release a number of pro-inflammatory mediators that could contribute to secondary phase brain injury (23). Neuroinflammatory factors increase after TBI and likely contribute to oxidative stress and neuronal death, which in turn further exacerbate the inflammatory response (24). The BBB destruction in TBI is associated with serum level of ICAM-1 (25). The effect of progesterone on the serum level of ICAM-1 in the present study is consistent with studies that the ICAM-1 reduced in rats with brain injury following progesterone (16, 17). Also, progesterone decreased the inflammatory response and the leukocytes infiltration in the ischemic brain by inhibiting the expression of ICAM-1 (26). To the best of our knowledge, there has not yet been any contrary study assessing the effect of progesterone on ICAM-1 level in brain injury. The results of previous (19) and present studies confirm that a high level of adhesion molecules in TBI patients is associated with poor outcome (27). In the current study, progesterone treatment did not alter the serum level of NSE that may be due to a number of reasons including dose and duration of the progesterone treatment or not targeted these parameters by progesterone that requires further exploration. To the best of our knowledge, there has not yet been any study assessing the effect of progesterone on the NSE level in brain injury. The increase in the NSE concentration could be an indication of inflammatory response after TBI (28). The relation of the NSE level in serum with outcome has been shown in 72 h postinjury, probably because of its short half-life (29). The increase in the serum level of NSE was associated to favorable outcome in other study (30). However, previous (19) and present studies indicate that the serum level of NSE is not different between patients with favorable outcome and those with unfavorable outcome. It is postulated that the difference between results may be due to the timing schedule used for taking blood samples. Also, in a study, early elevation in the CSF level of NSE in patients with severe TBI was able to predict those patients who would involve to brain death from those who would survive (31). It is mentioned that injury severity of the patients in our study was not severe. Progesterone may act on inflammation both directly (32) and indirectly by the modulation of toll-like receptors and NF-κB signaling with a concurrent reduction in cytokines (33). NF-κB is a transcriptional factor required for the gene expression of many inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β, IL-6 and ICAM-1 (17). The inhibition of NF-kB activation may provide a pharmacological agent against the pathological inflammatory conditions (34). The down-regulation of NF-kB has been reported by progesterone at 5 days postinjury (16). So, progesterone may decrease ICAM-1 by suppressing the NF-kB activation. The exact mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, progesterone may attenuate the development of secondary brain damage following primary trauma in part by decreasing ICAM-1. The latter may be one of the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of progesterone that needs further investigations for confirmation. An association of ICAM-1 and NSE to neurologic outcome in DAI also needs to be further studied.

5.1. Limitations

Our study has a number of limitations that should be considered. First, sample size of the study was small that can cause type II error. Second, the current study was limited to adults, whereas the TBI is also a very common occurrence in pediatric patients.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Role of cerebral inflammation after traumatic brain injury: a revisited concept.

Authors:  M C Morganti-Kossmann; M Rancan; V I Otto; P F Stahel; T Kossmann
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Effect of sex steroid hormones on brain edema, intracranial pressure, and neurologic outcomes after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nader Shahrokhi; Mohammad Khaksari; Zahra Soltani; Mehdi Mahmoodi; Nouzar Nakhaee
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 3.  Progesterone for neuroprotection in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Courtney L Robertson; Emin Fidan; Rachel M Stanley; Corina Noje; Hülya Bayir
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.624

4.  Progesterone alleviates acute brain injury via reducing apoptosis and oxidative stress in a rat experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage model.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Shenglong Cao; Jingyin Chen; Feng Yan; Gao Chen; Yuying Dai
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Inflammatory gene expression in cerebral ischemia and trauma. Potential new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  G Z Feuerstein; X Wang; F C Barone
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Neuron-specific enolase concentrations in blood as a prognostic parameter in cerebrovascular diseases.

Authors:  H Schaarschmidt; H W Prange; H Reiber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Progesterone protective effects in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation.

Authors:  A F De Nicola; M C Gonzalez Deniselle; L Garay; M Meyer; G Gargiulo-Monachelli; R Guennoun; M Schumacher; M C Carreras; J J Poderoso
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 8.  Modulation of immune response by head injury.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann; Laveniya Satgunaseelan; Nicole Bye; Thomas Kossmann
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Progesterone treatment reduces neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and brain damage and improves long-term outcomes in a rat model of repeated mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kyria M Webster; David K Wright; Mujun Sun; Bridgette D Semple; Ezgi Ozturk; Donald G Stein; Terence J O'Brien; Sandy R Shultz
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Thomas Woodcock; Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Female Sex Steroids Administration on Pathophysiologic Mechanisms in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Mohammad Khaksari; Zahra Soltani; Nader Shahrokhi
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 2.  Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomarkers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dynamics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eric Peter Thelin; Frederick Adam Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Stefania Mondello; András Büki; Bo-Michael Bellander; Adel Helmy; David K Menon; David W Nelson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  The Effect of Candesartan Alone and Its Combination With Estrogen on Post-traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Female Rats.

Authors:  Mojdeh Hajmohammadi; Mohammad Khaksari; Zahra Soltani; Nader Shahrokhi; Hamid Najafipour; Reza Abbasi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Blood Biomarkers for Detection of Brain Injury in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Steven T DeKosky; Patrick M Kochanek; Alex B Valadka; Robert S B Clark; Sherry H-Y Chou; Alicia K Au; Christopher Horvat; Ruchira M Jha; Rebekah Mannix; Stephen R Wisniewski; Max Wintermark; Susan E Rowell; Robert D Welch; Lawrence Lewis; Stacey House; Rudolph E Tanzi; Darci R Smith; Amy Y Vittor; Nancy D Denslow; Michael D Davis; Olena Y Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.