Literature DB >> 27800284

The Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP): A Clinician-administered Tool with Categorical, Dimensional, and Numeric Output-Conceptual Development, Design, and Description of the SCIP.

Ahmed Aboraya1, Henry Nasrallah1, Srinivas Muvvala1, Ahmed El-Missiry1, Hader Mansour1, Cheryl Hill1, Daniel Elswick1, Elizabeth C Price1.   

Abstract

Existing standardized diagnostic interviews (SDIs) were designed for researchers and produce mainly categorical diagnoses. There is an urgent need for a clinician-administered tool that produces dimensional measures, in addition to categorical diagnoses. The Standard for Clinicians' Interview in Psychiatry (SCIP) is a method of assessment of psychopathology for adults. It is designed to be administered by clinicians and includes the SCIP manual and the SCIP interview. Clinicians use the SCIP questions and rate the responses according to the SCIP manual rules. Clinicians use the patient's responses to questions, observe the patient's behaviors and make the final rating of the various signs and symptoms assessed. The SCIP method of psychiatric assessment has three components: 1) the SCIP interview (dimensional) component, 2) the etiological component, and 3) the disorder classification component. The SCIP produces three main categories of clinical data: 1) a diagnostic classification of psychiatric disorders, 2) dimensional scores, and 3) numeric data. The SCIP provides diagnoses consistent with criteria from editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). The SCIP produces 18 dimensional measures for key psychiatric signs or symptoms: anxiety, posttraumatic stress, obsessions, compulsions, depression, mania, suicidality, suicidal behavior, delusions, hallucinations, agitation, disorganized behavior, negativity, catatonia, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, attention, and hyperactivity. The SCIP produces numeric severity data for use in either clinical care or research. The SCIP was shown to be a valid and reliable assessment tool, and the validity and reliability results were published in 2014 and 2015. The SCIP is compatible with personalized psychiatry research and is in line with the Research Domain Criteria framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interview in Psychiatry; Psychiatric interview; SCIP; Standard for Clinicians’; descriptive psychopathology; diagnostic criteria; dimensional scores; standardized diagnostic interviews

Year:  2016        PMID: 27800284      PMCID: PMC5077257     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  31 in total

1.  The failure of the schizophrenia concept and the argument for its replacement by hebephrenia: applying the medical model for disease recognition.

Authors:  Michael Alan Taylor; Edward Shorter; Nutan Atre Vaidya; Max Fink
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

3.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability.

Authors:  J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First; R L Spitzer; M Davies; J Borus; M J Howes; J Kane; H G Pope; B Rounsaville
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

Review 4.  On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11.

Authors:  David J Kupfer; Darrel A Regier; Emily A Kuhl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Mental illness--comprehensive evaluation or checklist?

Authors:  Paul R McHugh; Phillip R Slavney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Use of Structured Interviews by Psychiatrists in Real Clinical Settings: Results of an Open-question Survey.

Authors:  Ahmed Aboraya
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2009-06

Review 7.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability.

Authors:  W K Goodman; L H Price; S A Rasmussen; C Mazure; R L Fleischmann; C L Hill; G R Heninger; D S Charney
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1989-11

Review 9.  Genomewide association studies: history, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Sven Cichon; Nick Craddock; Mark Daly; Stephen V Faraone; Pablo V Gejman; John Kelsoe; Thomas Lehner; Douglas F Levinson; Audra Moran; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 10.  Personalized medicine in psychiatry: problems and promises.

Authors:  Uzoezi Ozomaro; Claes Wahlestedt; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  2 in total

1.  Data Collection for Mental Health Studies Through Digital Platforms: Requirements and Design of a Prototype.

Authors:  Talayeh Aledavood; Ana Maria Triana Hoyos; Tuomas Alakörkkö; Kimmo Kaski; Jari Saramäki; Erkki Isometsä; Richard K Darst
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-06-09

2.  Identifying postnatal anxiety: comparison of self-identified and self-reported anxiety using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  Gracia Fellmeth; Siân Harrison; Jenny McNeill; Fiona Lynn; Maggie Redshaw; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.