| Literature DB >> 27800158 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A profile of adolescent alcohol use for China that specified gender, school type and a consistent definition of alcohol use.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Alcohol; China
Year: 2016 PMID: 27800158 PMCID: PMC5080736 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-016-0157-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Fig. 1Flowchart of selection of studies for inclusion in meta-analysis
Characteristics of the sample of the included studies
| Reference | Male drinking rate | Female drinking rate | Sample size | School number | Year of study | Response level | Collector | Minority region | Definition | Authorship | Case number and % | Rural | City/province |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school | |||||||||||||
| Lin et al., 2010 [ | 21.1 | 18.9 | 1,338 | NA | 2008 | 99.88 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Fuzhou, Fujian |
| An et al., 2013 [ | 16.4 | 12.2 | 1,985 | 8 | 2010 | 94.20 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Shenyang, Liaoning, Guangzhou, Guangdong |
| Lu et al., 2015 [ | 18.2 | 13.9 | 6,575 | 67 | 2013 | 96.50 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou |
| Aximu et al., 2007 [ | 28.5 | 20.5 | 3,575 | NA | NA | NA | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Three cities across Xinjiang |
| Bao et al., 2014 [ | 49.6 | 27.6 | 1,608 | 4 | 2011 | 98.50 | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Xi’an, Shaan Xi |
| Huang & Wang, 2010 [ | 33.1 | 21.9 | 1,773 | 8 | 2008 | 99.16 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Haidian district, Beijing |
| H. Liu & Jia, 2010 [ | 42.3 | 23 | 1,933 | 8 | NA | 94.02 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Tianjin City |
| Y. Liu et al., 2013 [ | 21.3 | 15.2 | 2,005 | NA | 2008 | NA | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Bejing |
| Ruan et al., 2009 [ | 30.7 | 19.7 | 4,983 | 22 | 2008 | 99.45 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | 3 counties and 3 cities across Guangxi |
| Tang et al., 2015 [ | 18.1 | 11.5 | 2,527 | 18 | NA | 96.04 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Shanghai City |
| C. Wu & Xie, 2009 [ | 23.5 | 21.1 | 1,345 | 8 | 2008 | 95.95 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Zaozhuang, Shandong |
| S. Wu & Wang, 2011 [ | 23.8 | 23.9 | 785 | 4 | 2006 | 96.70 | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Guangzhou, Guangdong |
| G. Yu et al., 2010 [ | 21.8 | 4.1 | 859 | 6 | NA | 97.80 | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Taojiang County, Henan |
| J. Yu et al., 2010 [ | 20.3 | 17.4 | 456 | 2 | 2008 | 98.91 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Tonglu Town, Zhejiang |
| L. Zhang & Zhang, 2015 [ | 31.9 | 18.6 | 957 | 5 | 2013 | NA | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Xiangxi, Hunan |
| R. Zhang et al., 2013 [ | 20.2 | 13.7 | 2,939 | 17 | NA | NA | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Three cities across Zhejiang Province |
| X. Zhang et al., 2011 [ | 19.1 | 13.5 | 1,802 | 25 | NA | 98.00 | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Hangzhou, Zhejiang |
| Y. Zhang et al., 2014 [ | 12.9 | 12.6 | 1,174 | 7 | 2013 | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Changzhou, Jiangsu |
| Zhong et al., 2007 [ | 24.7 | 7.2 | 5,158 | NA | 2004–2005 | NA | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Four cities across Henan |
| Zhu et al., 2009 [ | 12.2 | 7.7 | 1,427 | 4 | 2008 | 97.40 | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Zhangye, Gansu |
| High school | |||||||||||||
| Zhao & Lv, 2013 [ | 13.3 | 6.3 | 1,768 | 6 | NA | 98.20 | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Taiyuan, ShanXi |
| Ruan et al., 2009 [ | 43.7 | 21.1 | 5,072 | 21 | 2008 | 99.45 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | 3 counties and 3 cities across Guangxi |
| Tang et al., 2015 [ | 25.2 | 14.6 | 1,050 | 18 | NA | 96.04 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Shanghai City |
| C. Wu & Xie, 2009 [ | 30.3 | 36.7 | 1,988 | 8 | 2008 | 95.95 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Zaozhuang, Shandong |
| J. Yu et al., 2010 [ | 32.2 | 15.3 | 408 | 2 | 2008 | 98.91 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Lutong Town, Zhejiang province |
| Y. Zhang et al., 2014 [ | 29.1 | 16 | 826 | 4 | 2013 | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Changzhou, Jiangsu |
| Zhong et al., 2007 [ | 40.4 | 18 | 7,627 | NA | 2004-2005 | NA | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Four cities across Henan |
| Zhu et al., 2009 [ | 49.4 | 28 | 1,855 | 4 | 2008 | 97.40 | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Zhangye, Gansu |
| Shao et al., 2013 [ | 37.3 | 23.4 | 8,329 | NA | 2008–2010 | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Seven cities across Liaoning |
| D. Wu et al., 2008 [ | 36 | 25.8 | 1,011 | 4 | 2007 | 99.70 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Shenzhen City |
| Xu et al., 2014 [ | 71.7 | 53.6 | 1,440 | 4 | 2012 | 97.60 | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Xi’an, Shaan Xi |
| L. Zhang & Ma, 2013 [ | 39.6 | 16 | 437 | 1 | NA | 95.00 | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Shihezi, Xinjiang |
| Vocational high school | |||||||||||||
| Ruan et al., 2009 [ | 64.5 | 34.4 | 2,420 | 11 | 2008 | 99.45 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | 3 counties and 3 cities across Guangxi |
| Tang et al., 2015 [ | 39.4 | 32.9 | 1,034 | 10 | NA | 96.04 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Shanghai City |
| J. Yu et al., 2010 [ | 48.4 | 35.8 | 228 | 1 | 2008 | 98.91 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Lutong Town, Zhejiang |
| Y. Zhang et al., 2014 [ | 25.1 | 18.7 | 601 | 3 | 2013 | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Changzhou, Jiangsu |
| Shao et al., 2013 [ | 51.9 | 32.7 | 3,572 | NA | 2008–2010 | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Seven cities across Liaoning |
| Liang & Zeng, 2013 [ | 39.9 | 20.9 | 1,013 | 2 | NA | 96.10 | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Chaozhou, Guangdong |
Fig. 2Funnel plots of drinking rate in the last 30 days among adolescents in China using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model
Egger’s two tail test for middle, high, and vocational high male and female students’ drinking rate in the last 30 days
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school male students | .857 | 18 | 4.126 | .403 |
| Middle school female students | .017 | 18 | 3.784 | .987 |
| High school male students | .665 | 10 | 4.827 | .522 |
| High school female students | .311 | 10 | 4.830 | .762 |
| Vocational high school male students | 1.34 | 4 | 5.655 | .250 |
| Vocational high school female students | 1.38 | 4 | 3.138 | .238 |
N = 20 for middle school males and females, N = 12 for high school males and females, N = 6 for vocational high school males and females
Fig. 3Sensitivity analysis statistic summary and forest plots among adolescents in China using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model
Pooled estimates of drinking rate (last 30 days) using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effect models, data from China 2007–2015
| subgroup | No. of studies | Range of prevalence (%) | Pooled prevalence (%) | 95 % CI (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school students drinking rates | |||||
| Male | 20 | 12.2, 49.6 | 23.6 | 20.1, 27.4 | 97.6*** |
| Female | 20 | 4.1,27.6 | 15.3 | 12.7, 18.2 | 97.1*** |
| High school students drinking rates | |||||
| Male | 12 | 13.3, 71.7 | 36.5 | 30.4, 43.1 | 98.3*** |
| Female | 12 | 6.3, 53.6 | 21.2 | 16.5, 26.8 | 98.3*** |
| Vocational high school students drinking rates | |||||
| Male | 6 | 25.1, 64.5 | 44.7 | 34.7, 55.1 | 97.4*** |
| Female | 6 | 18.7,34.4 | 28.8 | 24.2, 33.9 | 91.6*** |
N = 20 for middle school males and females, N = 12 for high school males and females, N = 6 for vocational high school males and females. ***p < .001, for Q-test p-value
Factors associated with the heterogeneity of drinking rate (last 30 days) estimates among Chinese middle and high school students using meta-regression for four outcomes reported in 10 or more studies from 2007–2015
| Outcome variables | Moderator | Bivariate |
| Hieratical |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school students’ drinking rate | |||||
| Male | Location (north/south) | .368* | 15 | ||
| Female | Location (east to middle) | .741** | 28 | .589* | 50 |
| Location (west to middle) | .776* | .804* | |||
| Collector (Yes) | .790** | 28 | .727** | ||
| High school students’ drinking rate | |||||
| Male | Location (east to middle) | .422 | 49 | -.106 | 80 |
| Location (west to middle) | 1.29** | 1.05*** | |||
| Definition (Yes) | -.675* | 28 | |||
| Collector (Yes) | .729* | 19 | 1.117*** | ||
| Female | Location (east to middle) | .779* | 34 | .474 | 80 |
| Location (west to middle) | .805* | .867** | |||
| Collector (Yes) | 1.043* | 33 | .959** | ||
| Definition (Yes) | -.794* | 35 | -.588* | ||
N = 20 for middle school males and females, N = 12 for high school males and females, N = 6 for vocational high school males and females. ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .1. The moderator of authorship for high school female students was significantly associated with drinking rate, it also has a strong correlation (r = −.775, p = .003) with the moderator of trained data collector. To deal with the collinearity issue, the moderator of authorship was removed in the hieratical meta-regression analysis. Bonferroni correction applied on the significance level of .1: the significant level changed to .05 for 2 moderators, .033 for 3 moderators; Bonferroni correction applied on the significant level of .01, the significant level changed to .005 for 2 moderators, .003 for 3 moderators; Bonferroni correction applied on the significant level of .001, the significant level changed to .0005 for 2 moderators, and .0003 for 3 moderators
The pooled estimates of drinking rates (last 30 days) among different groups by using DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model
| Outcome variable | Subgroup | Number of studies | Pooled estimate | 95 % CI |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school male students’ drinking rate | ||||||
| Location south | 11 | 21.8 | 18.8, 25.2 | 93.9 | 2.47 | |
| Location north | 7 | 28.7 | 21.0, 37.8 | 98.3 | ||
| Middle school female students’ drinking rate | ||||||
| Location east | 14 | 16.6 | 14.6, 18.9 | 92.0 | 3.26 | |
| Location middle | 3 | 8.5 | 3.9, 17.4 | 96.8 | ||
| Location west | 3 | 17.0 | 9.8, 27.8 | 97.7 | ||
| Collector (Yes) | 17 | 16.8 | 13.8, 20.2 | 95.3 | 4.0* | |
| Collector (No) | 3 | 8.1 | 3.9, 16.1 | 97.2 | ||
| High school male students’ drinking rate | ||||||
| Location east | 7 | 33.4 | 28.9, 38.2 | 94.6 | 5.05* | |
| Location middle | 2 | 24.4 | 7.0, 58.1 | 99.5 | ||
| Location west | 3 | 54.2 | 35.7, 71.6 | 98.1 | ||
| Collector (Yes) | 10 | 39.3 | 33.5, 45.5 | 97.9 | .956 | |
| Collector (No) | 2 | 24.0 | 7.0, 56.7 | 98.5 | ||
| Definition (Yes) | 6 | 29.1 | 21.7, 37.8 | 98.4 | 5.024* | |
| Definition (No) | 6 | 44.6 | 34.1, 55.5 | 98.2 | ||
| High school female students’ drinking rate | ||||||
| Location east | 7 | 21.5 | 17.3, 26.2 | 95.8 | 2.89 | |
| Location middle | 2 | 10.9 | 3.7, 28.1 | 98.5 | ||
| Location west | 3 | 30.8 | 14.9, 53.1 | 98.7 | ||
| Collector (Yes) | 10 | 24.1 | 18.9, 30.2 | 98.3 | 3.63* | |
| Collector (No) | 2 | 10.1 | 3.9, 23.9 | 96.2 | ||
| Definition (Yes) | 6 | 15.4 | 11.5, 20.1 | 98.9 | 5.68* | |
| Definition (No) | 6 | 28.4 | 18.6, 40.8 | 96.4 | ||
N = 20 for middle school males and females, N = 12 for high school males and females, N = 6 for vocational high school males and females. *p < .1. Only studies that contained the moderator information are included in the group comparisons. For middle school students, the location for two studies that included samples from more than one region were deleted from the comparison [18, 19]