| Literature DB >> 27800084 |
Lebapotswe Tlale1, Rosemary Frasso2, Onalenna Kgosiesele3, Mpho Selemogo1, Quirk Mothei4, Dereje Habte1, Andrew Steenhoff5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: TB contact tracing rates remain low in high burden settings and reasons for this are not well known. We describe factors that influence health care workers' (HCW) implementation of TB contact tracing (CT) in a high TB burden district of Botswana.Entities:
Keywords: Tuberculosis; guidelines; policy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27800084 PMCID: PMC5075480 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2016.24.229.7004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Figure 1Flow diagram of study enrollment
Figure 2Experience of HCW working with TB patients
Profession of subjects who participated in the study as compared to the health care work force in the district overall
| Occupation | No. in study (% of total in study) | No. in Kweneng East district (% of HCW in district) | Proportion of cadre sampled in the study (study n/total N in the district) | Comparison of proportion of those in study vs total in the district |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nurses | 65 (63%) | 145 (61%) | 45% | 0.78 |
| Health Education Assistants | 16 (15%) | 41 (17%) | 39% | 0.67 |
| TB focal persons | 17 (16%) | 37 (15%) | 46% | 0.85 |
| Medical officers | 6 (6%) | 15 (6%) | 40% | 0.85 |
| Total | 104 (100%) | 238 (100%) | 44% | - |
Knowledge of and training in TB contact tracing by occupation
| Occupation | Proportion working with acceptable knowledge of TB CT | Knowledge: comparison between this group and nurses | Proportion trained to do TB contact tracing | Training: comparison between this group and nurses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nurses | 37/64 (58%) | Reference | 35/65 (54%) | Reference |
| Health Education Assistants | 11/16 (69%) | 0.42 | 14/15 (93%) | 0.005 |
| TB focal person and others | 9/17 (53%) | 0.71 | 10/17 (59%) | 0.71 |
| Medical Officers | 1/6 (17%) | 0.06 | 3/6 (50%) | 0.86 |
Acceptable knowledge defined as knowing both the steps to complete contact tracing as well as knowing about Botswana’s National TB contact tracing forms.
Defined as having attended at least one training session on how to do contact tracing.
This included 2 TB coordinators, 2 health education technicians, 4 health education assistants and 9 nurses.
Practices of health care workers when conducting tuberculosis contact tracing
| Nurse | Health Education Assistant | TB focal person and others | Medical officer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very good | 76% | 50% | 40% | 100% | 67% | |
| Good | 20% | 50% | 60% | 0% | 33% | |
| Fair | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
| Poor | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
| Very poor | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| Never | 3% | 6% | 80% | 0% | 22% | |
| Less than 1/year | 30% | 19% | 20% | 100% | 42% | |
| About 1/month | 37% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 13% | |
| About 1/week | 30% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 17% | |
| More than 1/week | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 6% | |
| Yes | 13% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 11% | |
| No | 54% | 46% | 80% | 100% | 70% | |
| Not sure | 33% | 23% | 20% | 0% | 19% | |
TB: tuberculosis; CT: contact tracing
Personal and patient factors influencing health worker implementation of TB contact tracing
| Proportion who said “Yes” (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors that influence my implementation of contact tracing | Nurses | Health Education Assistants | TB focal persons and others | Medical officers | Total | P value comparing proportion who said “yes” vs “no” for each factor |
| Commitment of other HCW toward CT | 40/54 (74%) | 6/9 (67%) | 8/9 (89%) | 0/4 (0%) | 54/76 (71%) | |
| My monthly income | 13/55 (24%) | 5/10 (50%) | 4/12 (33%) | 0/4 (0%) | 22/81 (27%) | |
| My distance from work | 24/51 (47%) | 6/8 (75%) | 7/11 (64%) | 2/4 (50%) | 39/74 (53%) | |
| Involvement of other HCW | 49/58 (84%) | 7/9 (78%) | 7/9 (78%) | 2/4 (50%) | 65/80 (81%) | |
| Dissatisfaction with my job | 23/50 (46%) | 6/8 (75%) | 7/11 (64%) | 2/4 (50%) | 38/73 (52%) | |
| Patient numbers too many | 25/53 (47%) | 5/9 (56%) | 7/11 (64%) | 1/2 (50%) | 38/75 (51%) | |
| Distant location of patient | 48/56 (86%) | 11/11 (100%) | 14/14 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 76/85 (89%) | |
| Migration and mobility of patients | 59/61 (97%) | 11/11 (100%) | 11/12 (92%) | 5/5 (100%) | 86/89 (97%) | |
| Unknown patient address | 41/52 (79%) | 5/7 (71%) | 13/13 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 62/76 (82%) | |
NOTE: 1. Yes refers to those who responded by saying that they strongly agree and agree both combined e.g. Yes SA + A
2. No refers to those who responded by saying that they strongly disagree and disagree both combined e.g. No = SD + D
3. Those who answered “fairly” were not included in the analysis
4. Those who did not respond to the question were not included in the analysis
Administrative factors influencing health worker implementation of TB contact tracing
| Proportion who said “Yes” (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors that influence my implementation of contact tracing | Nurses | Health Education Assistants | TB focal persons and others | Medical officers | Total | Comparing proportion who said “yes” vs “no” for each factor |
| Shortage of staff | 60/62 (97%) | 9/9 (100%) | 13/13 (100%) | 3/4 (75%) | 85/88 (97%) | |
| Lack of transport | 61/62 (98%) | 9/10 (90%) | 13/13 (100%) | 5/5 (100%) | 88/90 (98%) | |
| Lack of medical infrastructure | 42/53 (79%) | 0/6 (0%) | 9/12 (75%) | 2/5 (40%) | 53/76 (53%) | |
| Unavailability of supplies | 25/46 (54%) | 3/8 (38%) | 5/11 (45%) | 2/5 (40%) | 35/70 (50%) | |
| Poor reporting and recording of TB contact tracing | 35/52 (67%) | 9/11 (82%) | 9/11 (82%) | 4/4 (100%) | 57/78 (73%) | |
| Poor policy and guidelines | 18/48 (38%) | 2/6 (33%) | 8/12 (67%) | 1/4 (25%) | 29/70 (41%) | |