Literature DB >> 27800030

Fertility preservation in males with cancer: 16-year monocentric experience of sperm banking and post-thaw reproductive outcomes.

Raffaella Depalo1, Doriana Falagario2, Paola Masciandaro1, Claudia Nardelli1, Margherita Patrizia Vacca1, Pasquale Capuano1, Giorgina Specchia1, Michele Battaglia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anticancer treatments can impair male fertility. Cryopreservation of semen is an efficient procedure for fertility preservation. The aim of this study was to evaluate pre-freeze semen parameters among the various types of cancer, post-thaw sperm viability and reproductive outcome of samples used for assisted reproductive treatment (ART).
METHODS: This study included 721 men with cancer that had their semen cryopreserved in our bank in 1999-2015. Semen analysis and cryopreservation were performed before the start of antineoplastic treatment, according to the World Health Organization recommendations, European Commission and Italian law.
RESULTS: Among the 721 patient, 196 had seminoma of the testis, 173 Hodgkin's lymphoma, 108 mixed testicular tumors, 89 germ cell tumors, 67 other tumors, 46 hematological tumors, and 42 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The mean age of patients was significantly lower in Hodgkin's lymphoma compared to other tumors. Statistically significant lower volume, sperm count and number of straws stored were observed respectively in Hodgkin's lymphoma, mixed testicular tumor and hematological tumors. Nineteen patients used their frozen semen for 20 ART cycles. After thawing a significant reduction of motility and vitality was recorded. A lower fertilization rate was observed in patients affected by testicular tumor and lymphoma (35.42% and 50%) compared with other cancers (71.43%). No significant differences were observed in terms of cleavage and implantation rates. A total of five pregnancies and seven healthy newborns were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Fertility preservation before gonadotoxic therapy is of great importance to patients with cancer and must be indicate before the start of treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF outcome with frozen semen; assisted reproductive technology; cancer; cryopreservation; fertility preservation; sperm bank

Year:  2016        PMID: 27800030      PMCID: PMC5066546          DOI: 10.1177/1758834016665078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol        ISSN: 1758-8340            Impact factor:   8.168


  23 in total

1.  Sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment: a 15-year monocentric experience.

Authors:  P Bizet; J Saias-Magnan; E Jouve; J M Grillo; G Karsenty; C Metzler-Guillemain; J Perrin
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Follicular growth and oocyte maturation in GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer.

Authors:  Raffaella Depalo; Filomenamila Lorusso; Marcella Palmisano; Emma Bassi; Ilaria Totaro; Margherita Vacca; Paolo Trerotoli; Paola Masciandaro; Luigi Selvaggi
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 3.  Sperm banking and assisted reproduction treatment for couples following cancer treatment of the male partner.

Authors:  A Lass; F Akagbosu; P Brinsden
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage.

Authors:  S Kelleher; S M Wishart; P Y Liu; L Turner; I Di Pierro; A J Conway; D J Handelsman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effect of chemo- or radiotherapy on sperm parameters of testicular cancer patients.

Authors:  Loredana Gandini; Paolo Sgrò; Francesco Lombardo; Donatella Paoli; Franco Culasso; Lucia Toselli; Petros Tsamatropoulos; Andrea Lenzi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Semen cryopreservation and usage rate for assisted reproductive technology in 898 men with cancer.

Authors:  Iris Muller; Ralph J A Oude Ophuis; Frank J M Broekmans; Tycho M T W Lock
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Comparison of protective media and freezing techniques for cryopreservation of human semen.

Authors:  P Stanic; M Tandara; Z Sonicki; V Simunic; B Radakovic; E Suchanek
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  The effects of cryopreservation on sperm morphology, motility and mitochondrial function.

Authors:  M O'Connell; N McClure; S E M Lewis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients.

Authors:  Guido Ragni; Edgardo Somigliana; Liliana Restelli; Roberta Salvi; Mariangela Arnoldi; Alessio Paffoni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Male Fertility Preservation.

Authors:  J Abram McBride; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Preservation of fertility of adult male cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Koji Kawai; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A call to action: unified clinical practice guidelines for oncofertility care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sehring; Anisa Hussain; Lauren Grimm; Elisabeth Rosen; Jody Esguerra; Karine Matevossian; Erica Louden; Angeline Beltsos; Roohi Jeelani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Semen cryopreservation as an oncofertility treatment in 122 Japanese men with cancer: A decade-long study.

Authors:  Hideyuki Kobayashi; Koji Tamura; Toshihiro Tai; Koichi Nagao; Koichi Nakajima
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-07

5.  Current status of sperm banking for young cancer patients in Japanese nationwide survey.

Authors:  Yasushi Yumura; Akira Tsujimura; Hiroshi Okada; Kuniaki Ota; Masahumi Kitazawa; Tatsuya Suzuki; Tosiyuki Kakinuma; Seido Takae; Nao Suzuki; Teruaki Iwamoto
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  The outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles in male cancer patients: retrospective analysis of procedures from 2004 to 2018.

Authors:  Tanja Burnik Papler; Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal; Saso Drobnic; Martin Stimpfel
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Impact of cancer on cryopreserved sperm quality and fertility: A cohort study.

Authors:  David Pening; Marnie Constant; Manon Bruynbroeck; Anne Delbaere; I Demeestere
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20

8.  A retrospective study on sperm banking: a Uruguayan experience.

Authors:  Rosina Ordoqui; Natalibeth Barrera; José María Montes; Mariel Canepa; Carla Bonelli; Carolina Surka; Andrea Torrens; Lidia Cantú; Stefan S du Plessis
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-06-01

9.  Sperm imprinting integrity in seminoma patients?

Authors:  Céline Bruno; Oxana Blagoskonov; Julie Barberet; Magali Guilleman; Sandrine Daniel; Benjamin Tournier; Christine Binquet; Cécile Choux; Patricia Fauque
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 6.551

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.