Literature DB >> 2779998

Lens rim artifact in automated threshold perimetry.

A H Zalta1.   

Abstract

In central static threshold visual fields (Humphrey 30-2 Program) performed with a corrective lens, lens rim artifact (LRA) was present in 10.4% of 704 fields examined retrospectively and 6.2% of 276 fields evaluated prospectively. Lens rim artifact most commonly presented as a combination of absolute and relative defects involving the temporal quadrant either alone or in combination with another quadrant. Lens rim artifact was related to seven different types of interpretational errors, five of which led to an overdiagnosis and two to an underdiagnosis. Risk factors for the occurrence of LRA include older age, high hyperopic correction, and location specific involvement probably due to a limitation in perimeter design. Field defects involving only the four targets at 27 degrees eccentricity in the temporal quadrant were due only to LRA in this series and may be disregarded when interpreting the Humphrey 30-2 Program. Recommendations are made toward minimizing the occurrence of LRA and avoiding interpretational errors associated with LRA.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2779998     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32722-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  W O Young; W C Stewart; H Hunt; H Crosswell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Clinical Correlates of Computationally Derived Visual Field Defect Archetypes in Patients from a Glaucoma Clinic.

Authors:  Sophie Cai; Tobias Elze; Peter J Bex; Janey L Wiggs; Louis R Pasquale; Lucy Q Shen
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  Ganglion Cell Complex Analysis as a Potential Indicator of Early Neuronal Loss in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Geetha Athappilly; Ignacio García-Basterra; Flavia Machado-Miller; Thomas R Hedges; Carlos Mendoza-Santiesteban; Laurel Vuong
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2018-06-19

4.  Retinal nerve fiber layer defects and automated perimetry evaluation in ocular hypertensives.

Authors:  E Abecia; F M Honrubia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter.

Authors:  Stylianos Tsapakis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Marilita M Moschos; Dimitrios Brouzas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-07

6.  Application of Pattern Recognition Analysis to Optimize Hemifield Asymmetry Patterns for Early Detection of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Bang V Bui; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Perimetry Pitfalls in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Loulwah Mukharesh; Nurhan Torun; Marc A Bouffard
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.415

8.  Pupillary anomaly masquerading as a glaucomatous visual field defect: a case report.

Authors:  Niall Patton; Adrian Tey
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.