| Literature DB >> 27799868 |
Noriaki Morofuji1, Hidenori Ojima2, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka3, Takuji Okusaka4, Minoru Esaki5, Satoshi Nara5, Kazuaki Shimada5, Yoshiro Kishi6, Tadashi Kondo7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early recurrence after surgical resection is a hallmark of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To determine the proteomic background of early recurrence of HCC, we focused on apoptosis-related proteins.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody-based proteomics; Apoptosis; Biomarker; Early recurrence; Hepatocellular carcinoma
Year: 2016 PMID: 27799868 PMCID: PMC5078925 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-016-9130-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Proteomics ISSN: 1542-6416 Impact factor: 3.988
Clinicopathological features of 40 cases for discovery purpose
| Sample no. | Group | Age | Gender | Virus infection status | Child-Pugh classification | Adjacent liver tissue | AFP (ng/ml) | TNM stagea | Tumor number | Tumor size (cm) | Differentiationb | Portal vein invesion | Intrahepatic metastasis | Duration of recurrence (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 63 | M | None | A | CH | 137.5 | 3B | Single | 7.30 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.53 |
| 2 | S | 27 | M | HBV | A | CH | 91,850 | 2 | Multiple | 10.00 | Por | Presence | Absence | 0.63 |
| 3 | S | 72 | M | None | A | CH | 8061 | 2 | Single | 8.50 | Por | Presence | Absence | 0.89 |
| 4 | S | 29 | F | HBV | A | Normal | 56,570 | 2 | Single | 14.50 | Por | Presence | Absence | 1.84 |
| 5 | S | 70 | M | HBV | A | CH | 965.9 | 2 | Multiple | 3.30 | Por | Presence | Absence | 0.52 |
| 6 | S | 52 | F | HBV | B | CH | 57,820 | 3B | Single | 11.00 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.18 |
| 7 | S | 44 | M | HBV | A | CH | 2664 | 2 | Single | 4.50 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.71 |
| 8 | S | 72 | M | None | A | CH | 107,890 | 2 | Single | 10.00 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.27 |
| 9 | S | 68 | M | HBV | A | CH | 4739 | 2 | Single | 12.50 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.19 |
| 10 | S | 52 | M | HBV | A | CH | 526 | 2 | Single | 7.30 | Mod | Presence | Presence | 0.50 |
| 11 | L | 71 | M | None | A | CH | 4.5 | 1 | Single | 3.50 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 3.33 |
| 12 | L | 51 | M | HBV | A | CH | 18.5 | 1 | Single | 12.00 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 3.07 |
| 13 | L | 62 | M | None | A | CH | 18.8 | 1 | Single | 2.80 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 4.96 |
| 14 | L | 73 | M | HBV | A | CH | 4.9 | 1 | Single | 4.50 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.99 |
| 15 | L | 64 | M | HCV | A | CH | 3.1 | 1 | Multiple | 2.10 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 7.08 |
| 16 | L | 72 | M | HCV | A | LC | 102.3 | 1 | Multiple | 3.00 | Well | Absence | Absence | 5.74 |
| 17 | L | 52 | F | HBV | A | CH | 12.2 | 1 | Single | 2.00 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.38 |
| 18 | L | 62 | M | HCV | B | CH | 5.5 | 1 | Single | 2.50 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 3.38 |
| 19 | L | 71 | M | None | A | CH | 3.2 | 1 | Single | 2.00 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 4.89 |
| 20 | L | 65 | M | HCV | B | LC | 34.1 | 1 | Single | 3.40 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.85 |
| 21 | A | 70 | M | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 22 | A | 79 | M | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 23 | A | 36 | M | HBV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 24 | A | 57 | M | HBV | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 25 | A | 51 | M | HBV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 26 | A | 53 | M | None | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 27 | A | 63 | F | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 28 | A | 61 | M | HBV | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 29 | A | 72 | M | HCV | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 30 | A | 52 | F | HBV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 31 | N | 58 | F | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 32 | N | 49 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 33 | N | 74 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 34 | N | 39 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 35 | N | 68 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 36 | N | 64 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 37 | N | 32 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 38 | N | 70 | F | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 39 | N | 61 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 40 | N | 59 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
S duration of recurrence less than 2 years, L duration of recurrence more than 2 years, A adjacent liver tissue, N normal liver tissue, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, CH chronic hepatitis, LC liver cirrhosis
aTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th Edition, Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds): International Union Against Cancer (UICC): ‘‘TNM classification of malignant tumors.’’ 7th ed. New York
bWell, well differentiated; Mod, moderately differentiated; Por, poorly differentiated
Clinicopathological features of 40 cases for validation purpose
| Sample no. | Group | Age | Gender | Virus infection status | Child-Pugh classification | Adjacent liver tissue | AFP (ng/ml) | TNM stagea | Tumor number | Tumor size (cm) | Differentiationb | Portal vein invasion | Intrahepatic metastasis | Duration of recurrence (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | S | 47 | M | HBV | A | CH | 242 | 3B | Multiple | 11.50 | Mod | Presence | Presence | 0.28 |
| 42 | S | 37 | F | HBV | A | CH | 102,490 | 3A | Multiple | 6.50 | Por | Presence | Absence | 1.30 |
| 43 | S | 65 | M | None | A | CH | 3,104,000 | 4A | Single | 9.80 | Por | Presence | Absence | 0.34 |
| 44 | S | 55 | M | HBV | A | CH | 23.2 | 2 | Single | 6.70 | Mod | Presence | Presence | 0.43 |
| 45 | S | 57 | M | HCV | A | CH | 4718 | 2 | Single | 4.50 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.43 |
| 46 | S | 52 | M | HCV | A | LC | 25 | 2 | Single | 5.80 | Mod | Presence | Presence | 1.05 |
| 47 | S | 62 | M | HBV | A | CH | 62 | 2 | Single | 7.00 | Mod | Presence | Absence | 0.41 |
| 48 | S | 79 | M | HCV | A | CH | 134 | 3A | Multiple | 5.00 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.70 |
| 49 | S | 67 | M | HCV | A | CH | 18.7 | 2 | Multiple | 4.00 | Mod | Presence | Absence | 0.61 |
| 50 | S | 66 | M | HCV | A | CH | 2970 | 2 | Multiple | 3.50 | Por | Presence | Presence | 0.58 |
| 51 | L | 53 | M | None | B | LC | 43.5 | 1 | Single | 3.50 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.98 |
| 52 | L | 71 | M | None | A | Normal | 2.7 | 1 | Single | 3.50 | Well | Absence | Absence | 3.45 |
| 53 | L | 58 | M | None | A | Normal | 7.5 | 1 | Single | 5.80 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 8.14 |
| 54 | L | 61 | M | HBV | A | CH | 6.4 | 1 | Single | 2.70 | Well | Absence | Absence | 5.37 |
| 55 | L | 78 | M | HCV | A | CH | 8.4 | 1 | Single | 2.70 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 5.42 |
| 56 | L | 60 | M | HBV | A | CH | 7.2 | 1 | Single | 2.60 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.71 |
| 57 | L | 64 | F | HCV | A | LC | 9.9 | 1 | Single | 3.60 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 2.23 |
| 58 | L | 64 | M | HBV | A | CH | 16.9 | 1 | Single | 3.90 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 4.61 |
| 59 | L | 72 | M | HCV | B | CH | 103.7 | 1 | Single | 7.40 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 3.72 |
| 60 | L | 74 | M | None | A | Normal | 4.2 | 1 | Single | 3.50 | Mod | Absence | Absence | 4.28 |
| 61 | A | 75 | M | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 62 | A | 65 | F | HBV | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 63 | A | 70 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 64 | A | 63 | F | HBV | – | LC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 65 | A | 85 | M | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 66 | A | 41 | M | HBV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 67 | A | 58 | M | HCV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 68 | A | 58 | M | HBV | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 69 | A | 73 | M | None | – | CH | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 70 | A | 74 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 71 | N | 66 | F | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 72 | N | 69 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 73 | N | 60 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 74 | N | 73 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 75 | N | 63 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 76 | N | 59 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 77 | N | 65 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 78 | N | 47 | F | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 79 | N | 68 | F | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 80 | N | 71 | M | None | – | Normal | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
S duration of recurrence less than 2 years, L duration of recurrence more than 2 years, A adjacent liver tissue, N normal liver tissue, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, CH chronic hepatitis, LC liver cirrhosis
aTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th Edition, Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds): International Union Against Cancer (UICC): ‘‘TNM classification of malignant tumors.’’ 7th ed. New York
bWell, well differentiated; Mod, moderately differentiated; Por, poorly differentiated
Fig. 1Survival curves of the 40 patients with HCC included in this study. Overall survival is shown for the two groups of patients: group S did and group L did not have recurrence within 2 years of surgery (n = 20 each). The two groups presented distinct prognoses
Fig. 2Flow chart of the experimental procedure and results of first and second screenings. A panel of 247 antibodies for 192 apoptosis-associated proteins was screened in surgically resected HCC and adjacent normal tissue samples. Single antibodies generated multiple protein bands by western blotting. Band intensity was compared between samples. a First screening using four sample pools such as group N (normal liver tissue), A (adjacent liver tissue), L (tumor tissue without recurrence), and S (tumor tissue with recurrence within 2 years of surgery). b Second screening for the selected 37 antibodies
The 11 antibodies in western blotting screening
| Protein name | Fold difference (Ratio of median) | Pathway | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test set | Validation set | ||||
| NA versus LS | L versus S | NA versus LS | L versus S | ||
| Apaf-1 band 4 | 0.160 | 0.106 | 0.177 | 0.343 | Caspase cascade |
| Bclx band 1 | 0.150 | 0.104 | 0.777 | 0.771 | Mitochondrial pathway |
| Bclx band 2 | 0.283 | 0.050 | 0.622 | 0.377 | Mitochondrial pathway |
| Bclx band 3 | 0.104 | 0.155 | 0.244 | 0.268 | Mitochondrial pathway |
| Bclx band 4 | 0.220 | 0.214 | 0.746 | 0.913 | Mitochondrial pathway |
| CD120a/TNF-R1 band 2 | 0.324 | 0.376 | 0.519 | 0.836 | Extrinsic pathway |
| CD120a/TNF-R1 band 3 | 0.196 | 0.368 | 0.339 | 0.806 | Extrinsic pathway |
| FADD band 2 | 0.176 | 0.395 | 0.408 | 0.721 | Extrinsic pathway |
| p38MAPK band 2 | 0.402 | 0.404 | 0.576 | 0.722 | Extrinsic pathway |
| phospho-c-Abl(pTyr412) band 1 | 0.362 | 0.413 | 0.295 | 0.475 | Extrinsic pathway |
| PIASx1/2 (C-term) band 2 | 0.201 | 0.270 | 0.216 | 0.304 | p53 banding pathway |
| 14-3-3zeta band 2 | 0.499 | 0.328 | 0.774 | 0.453 | p53 banding pathway |
| 14-3-3zeta band 5 | 2.220 | 3.780 | 1.099 | 1.105 | p53 banding pathway |
| ERK1 band 1 | 2.715 | 2.017 | 5.996 | 2.040 | Extrinsic pathway |
| PKG band 1 | 3.874 | 2.548 | 2.635 | 2.027 | Extrinsic pathway |
| Stat1(C-terminus) band 2 | 8.270 | 2.801 | 1.748 | 1.225 | Caspase cascade |
| Stat1(C-terminus) band 4 | 2.058 | 6.237 | 2.119 | 1.696 | Caspase cascade |
| Stat1(C-terminus) band 5 | 2.221 | 4.080 | 1.518 | 1.399 | Caspase cascade |
Fig. 3Heat map of antigens recognized by 11 selected antibodies. Band intensities were normalized among samples and blots. Measured intensities are displayed as a heat map. a In the first screening, the intensity of 18 protein bands for 11 antibodies was up- or downregulated in HCC carcinogenesis and progression. b In the next screening, we examined the selected 11 antibodies using the 40 samples from the newly enrolled patients. c In the independent validation study, the intensity of six bands for six antibodies differed among sample groups. The quantitative data for western blotting images are presented in Additional file 3: Table S2, Additional file 4: Table S3, Additional file 5: Table S4
Fig. 4Western blot analysis of apaf-1 expression. Signals were observed in multiple locations in the blot and showed different intensities among sample groups. The theoretical molecular mass of apaf-1 is 130 kDa. The locations of the apaf-1 bands are indicated by arrows. The expected location of the apaf-1 band is indicated by an asterisk. The locations of apaf-1 bands associated with cancer progression and recurrence are boxed