[Purpose] The aim of this study was to identify how to effectively use elastic stockings. [Subjects and Methods] Ten young healthy men participated in this study. Time-averaged maximum flow velocity in the common femoral vein was measured for 20 seconds using a pulse Doppler method with a diagnostic ultrasound system under six conditions (three different positions and with and without stockings). Changes of blood flow velocity were compared. [Results] Elastic stockings did not affect the blood flow velocity in the common femoral vein. For both the with stockings condition and without stockings condition, the time-averaged maximum flow velocity in the head-up position was significantly lower than that in the supine and leg-up positions. Time-averaged maximum flow velocity showed no significant difference between the supine position and leg-up position. [Conclusion] Elastic stockings did not affect the blood flow velocity in the common femoral vein, but ankle positions did affect it. Further studies of patients with venous insufficiency are needed.
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to identify how to effectively use elastic stockings. [Subjects and Methods] Ten young healthy men participated in this study. Time-averaged maximum flow velocity in the common femoral vein was measured for 20 seconds using a pulse Doppler method with a diagnostic ultrasound system under six conditions (three different positions and with and without stockings). Changes of blood flow velocity were compared. [Results] Elastic stockings did not affect the blood flow velocity in the common femoral vein. For both the with stockings condition and without stockings condition, the time-averaged maximum flow velocity in the head-up position was significantly lower than that in the supine and leg-up positions. Time-averaged maximum flow velocity showed no significant difference between the supine position and leg-up position. [Conclusion] Elastic stockings did not affect the blood flow velocity in the common femoral vein, but ankle positions did affect it. Further studies of patients with venous insufficiency are needed.
Several guidelines have been published regarding the treatment and prevention of deep vein
thrombosis (DVT)1, 2). The guidelines underscore the fact that comprehensive measures for
prevention of DVT are necessary3).
Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep
vein thrombosis (JCS 2009)2) state that
elastic stockings are effective for the prevention of DVT. The mechanisms by which wearing
elastic stockings prevents DVT are prevention of blood stasis by increasing the blood flow
volume and decrease of the caliber of venous blood vessels by compression of the lower
limbs4). However, these effects are still
under debate5, 6). Nara et al. reported that there is little effect when elastic
stockings are used as a single application7), but Scurr et al. indicated that a combination of elastic stockings
and intermittent pneumatic compression was effective for prevention of DVT8). Therefore, examination of the effects of
combining elastic stockings with something else on prevention of DVT may be of clinical
significance. Toya et al. previously reported that ankle positions affect the blood velocity
in the common femoral vein during ankle pumping exercises9), which was recommended for the prevention of DVT.The aim of this study was to identify how to effectively use elastic stockings to change
the blood flow velocity in the common femoral vein under different ankle positions.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The study subjects were 10 males without a history of cardiovascular diseases and no
contraindications for exercise testing and training according to the guidelines of the
American Heart Association10).One experimenter (Y.F.) measured the blood flow velocity in all of these experiments.
Time-averaged maximum flow velocity (TAMV) in the left common femoral vein was measured
using a pulse Doppler method with a diagnostic ultrasound system (ACUSON P300, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). TAMV is the averaged blood flow velocity per unit time in
the left common femoral vein.The subject’s heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
were monitored (SunTech Tango+, SunTech Medical, USA) continuously during measurement of
TAMV.In this study, Comprinet® pro (BSN medical, Inc., USA) stocking were used, and
the right size for each subject according to the instruction manual was selected. Subjects
had 2 conditions, wearing stockings and not wearing stockings. Subjects were asked to assume
three different positions: supine (supine position), supine with the legs up after the
examination bed was raised to an 18-degree angle (leg-up position), and supine with the head
up after the examination bed was raised to a 30-degree angle (head-up position) (Fig. 1). At the beginning of each condition, the subjects had a 3-min rest period to
acclimatize themselves to each position. After the 3 min of rest, the TAMV in the left
common femoral vein was measured for 20 seconds. In total, the subjects were asked to
undergo testing under six conditions, that is, each of the 3 positions with and without
stockings. The order of the six conditions was randomized for each subject.
Fig. 1.
Experimental protocol
Experimental protocolTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare the TAMV values of blood flow
velocity. Bonferroni adjustments were applied for multiple comparisons. All analyses were
performed using SPSS Statistics ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and statistical
significance was accepted at an alpha level of 0.05.This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review of Tokyo University of Technology
(approval number; E14HS-026). All subjects gave written informed consent prior to data
collection. All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
RESULTS
Under the without stockings condition, the TAMV in the head-up position (16.6 ± 6.1 cm/sec)
was significantly lower than those in the supine (30.1 ± 17.8 cm/sec) and leg-up positions
(28.9 ± 17.5 cm/sec) (supine vs. head up, p<0.05, leg up vs. head up, p<0.05). TAMV
showed no significant difference between the supine position and leg- up position (Table 1). Under the with stockings condition, the TAMV in the head-up position (13.6 ±
4.4 cm/sec) was also significantly lower than those in the supine (33.1 ± 15.5 cm/sec) and
leg-up positions (27.7 ± 9.4 cm/sec) (supine vs. head up, p<0.01, leg up vs. head up,
p<0.01). TAMV showed no significant difference between the supine position and leg-up
position (Table 1).
Table 1.
Time-averaged maximum flow velocity in the common femoral vein in three different
positions with and without stockings
DISCUSSION
In this study, elastic stockings did not affect the blood flow velocity in the common
femoral vein. This can be attributed to the fact that subjects were young health males who
had no problem in their venous valves and venous vascular walls. Generally, the venous
diameter is wider than the arterial diameter, but the venous vascular wall is thinner than
the arterial vascular wall because it has a thinner layer of smooth muscle and fewer elastic
components. For this reason, veins have great compliance and thus a high blood volume, and
compression can easily change the venous shape11). In venous incompetence, the number of collagen fibers increases,
and the fibers are randomly aligned12, 13). Furthermore, veins cannot constrict and
expand adequately in response to the stimulation of noradrenalin, potassium chloride,
angiotensin II, nitric oxide, calcium ion, etc., and they do not function normally14). Additionally, expansion of veins and
blood stasis occur easily because dysfunction of venous valves causes the blood pressure to
increase in veins. Thus, it is likely that elastic stockings are effective in preventing
blood stasis in venous incompetence by compressing veins continuously and preventing them
from expanding15). In this study, the
subjects were young healthy males. Therefore, it is suspected that compression by elastic
stockings does not lead an increase in blood flow velocity, as their venous valves and
venous vascular walls functioned properly.On the other hand, ankle positions affect the blood velocity in the common femoral vein.
This result suggests that the hydrostatic pressure had an influence on venous return. It is
known that an increase in hydrostatic pressure disturbs venous return16), thus in venous incompetence, the blood velocity in the
common femoral vein can decrease markedly because venous incompetence disturbing venous
return may be affected profoundly by gravity.This study has some limitations: (1) the number of subjects in this study was relatively
low, and (2) the subjects were only young healthy male volunteers. This could have affected
results, and a study for different age groups of people should be performed. Further
research of patients with venous incompetence is also needed.
Authors: Gerald F Fletcher; Philip A Ades; Paul Kligfield; Ross Arena; Gary J Balady; Vera A Bittner; Lola A Coke; Jerome L Fleg; Daniel E Forman; Thomas C Gerber; Martha Gulati; Kushal Madan; Jonathan Rhodes; Paul D Thompson; Mark A Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J P Travers; C E Brookes; J Evans; D M Baker; C Kent; G S Makin; T M Mayhew Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell Journal: Chest Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 9.410