Literature DB >> 27799511

High-Risk of Adverse Pathologic Features in Patients With Clinical T1 High-Grade Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

Richard S Matulewicz1,1, Brendan T Frainey1, Daniel T Oberlin1, Joshua J Meeks1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy (RC) is used to treat select patients with T1 high-grade (T1HG) bladder cancer. However, population-level utilization trends and outcomes for these patients are not well-known. We sought to evaluate treatment patterns and clinicopathologic outcomes of RC for T1HG bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for 1998-2012, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with clinical T1HG bladder cancer. The prevalence of RC used to treat T1HG bladder cancer from 1998-2012 was determined. For years 2010-2012, demographic and cancer-related factors were described and regression analysis was used to examine associations with RC. Oncologic outcomes of RC were described and related to mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: Treatment of T1HG bladder cancer with RC nearly doubled, from 5.5% during 1998-2000 to 9.9%, during 2010-2012. For 2010-2012, 18,277 patients with T1HG bladder cancer were analyzed. Patients who underwent RC were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were more often treated at an academic center than those who did not undergo RC. At the time of RC, 41% of patients with T1HG bladder cancer were upstaged (pT2 or greater) and 12.7% had lymph node metastases. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 0.89 and 0.68, respectively. Extravesical (T3+) disease at RC had the strongest independent hazard (hazard ratio [HR], 2.32; 95% CI, 1.72-3.11) of death other than age of 82 years or older (HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.28-5.07).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of RC for T1HG bladder cancer has increased in prevalence in recent years but is still not widely used. There are concerning pathologic outcomes in patients with clinical T1HG bladder cancer treated with RC, including high rates of pathologic upstaging and nodal metastases. Future studies are necessary to better risk-stratify patients with T1HG bladder cancer to best select those who will benefit from aggressive therapy with RC.
Copyright © 2016 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27799511     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  5 in total

1.  Management of Recurrent Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

2.  Diagnostic Performance of Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System for the Prediction of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Francesco Del Giudice; Valdair F Muglia; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Soleen Ghafoor; Bernard H Bochner; Alvin C Goh; Hedvig Hricak; James W F Catto; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-19

3.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival for T1 High-Grade Patients After Radical Cystectomy: A Study Based on SEER.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Zhan; Luyao Chen; Ming Jiang; Bin Fu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 4.  VI-RADS score system - A primer for urologists.

Authors:  Refky Nicola; Martina Pecoraro; Sara Lucciola; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Yoshifumi Narumi; Valeria Panebianco; Valdair Francisco Muglia
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Treatment Outcomes of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) in Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studies: Systematic Literature Review (SLR).

Authors:  Mihaela Georgiana Musat; Christina Soeun Kwon; Elizabeth Masters; Slaven Sikirica; Debduth B Pijush; Anna Forsythe
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-01-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.