Michael Weitzman1,2,3,4, Afzal Hussein Yusufali4,5, Fatma Bali4,5, M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim3, Shashank Gandhi6, Richard Peltier7, Arthur Nadas3, Scott Sherman4,2,8, Lily Lee1,9, Zhang Hong1, Jenni Shearston8, Su Hyun Park1, Terry Gordon2,3,4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 2. College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 4. New York University/Abu Dhabi Public Health Research Center, Abu Dhabi, UAE. 5. Hatta Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, UAE. 6. Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA. 7. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. 8. Department of Population Health, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 9. Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hookahs (water pipes) are rapidly increasing in popularity worldwide. Evidence suggests that although perceived as safer than cigarette smoke, hookah smoke may be as, or even more, dangerous as cigarette smoke. METHODS: Air samples from 33 homes-11 where only hookah-smoking occurred, 12 with only cigarettes and 10 with no smoking-were collected to analyse concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon, elemental and organic carbon and carbon monoxide (CO). Air quality was assessed in rooms where smoking occurred and in an adjacent room. RESULTS: Hookah and cigarette smoking impaired home air quality. The rooms in which hookahs were smoked showed the highest concentrations for all pollutants. CO was significantly greater in the rooms where hookahs were smoked than in the cigarette-smoking rooms and the non-smoking households (p<0.05). In addition, CO levels in the rooms adjacent to where hookah was smoked were 2.5-fold to 4-fold greater than those in the smoking and non-smoking rooms of the cigarette homes (p<0.05). PM2.5 levels were also elevated in hookah homes compared to cigarette and non-smoking homes, although not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first of its kind, demonstrates potentially hazardous levels of home air pollution in rooms where hookahs are being smoked as well as in adjacent rooms. These levels were greater than those in cigarette smoking homes, raising concerns about potential negative health effects on all individuals living in homes where hookahs are smoked. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
INTRODUCTION: Hookahs (water pipes) are rapidly increasing in popularity worldwide. Evidence suggests that although perceived as safer than cigarette smoke, hookah smoke may be as, or even more, dangerous as cigarette smoke. METHODS: Air samples from 33 homes-11 where only hookah-smoking occurred, 12 with only cigarettes and 10 with no smoking-were collected to analyse concentrations of particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon, elemental and organic carbon and carbon monoxide (CO). Air quality was assessed in rooms where smoking occurred and in an adjacent room. RESULTS: Hookah and cigarette smoking impaired home air quality. The rooms in which hookahs were smoked showed the highest concentrations for all pollutants. CO was significantly greater in the rooms where hookahs were smoked than in the cigarette-smoking rooms and the non-smoking households (p<0.05). In addition, CO levels in the rooms adjacent to where hookah was smoked were 2.5-fold to 4-fold greater than those in the smoking and non-smoking rooms of the cigarette homes (p<0.05). PM2.5 levels were also elevated in hookah homes compared to cigarette and non-smoking homes, although not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first of its kind, demonstrates potentially hazardous levels of home air pollution in rooms where hookahs are being smoked as well as in adjacent rooms. These levels were greater than those in cigarette smoking homes, raising concerns about potential negative health effects on all individuals living in homes where hookahs are smoked. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Isaac M Lipkus; Thomas Eissenberg; Rochelle D Schwartz-Bloom; Alexander V Prokhorov; Janet Levy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Linwei Tian; Hong Qiu; Vivian C Pun; Hualiang Lin; Erjia Ge; Jazz C Chan; Peter K Louie; Kin-fai Ho; Ignatius T S Yu Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Karin B Yeatts; Mohamed El-Sadig; David Leith; William Kalsbeek; Fatma Al-Maskari; David Couper; William E Funk; Taoufik Zoubeidi; Ronna L Chan; Chris B Trent; Christopher A Davidson; Maryanne G Boundy; Maamoon M Kassab; Mohamed Y Hasan; Ivan Rusyn; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Zeynab Tabatabaei; Mohammad Ali Baghapour; Mohammad Hoseini; Mohammad Fararouei; Fariba Abbasi; Melika Baghapour Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng Date: 2021-09-09
Authors: Mohammed Al-Houqani; Andrea Leinberger-Jabari; Abdullah Al Naeemi; Abdullah Al Junaibi; Eiman Al Zaabi; Naima Oumeziane; Marina Kazim; Fatima Al Maskari; Ayesha Al Dhaheri; Leila Abdel Wareth; Wael Al Mahmeed; Habiba Alsafar; Fatme Al Anouti; Abdishakur Abdulle; Claire K Inman; Aisha Al Hamiz; Muna Haji; Jiyoung Ahn; Tomas Kirchhoff; Richard B Hayes; Ravichandran Ramasamy; Ann Marie Schmidt; Omar El Shahawy; Michael Weitzman; Raghib Ali; Scott Sherman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jenni Shearston; Lily Lee; James Eazor; Saher Meherally; Su Hyun Park; Mj Ruzmyn Vilcassim; Michael Weitzman; Terry Gordon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Markus Braun; Friedemann Koger; Doris Klingelhöfer; Ruth Müller; David A Groneberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sotiris Vardoulakis; Evanthia Giagloglou; Susanne Steinle; Alice Davis; Anne Sleeuwenhoek; Karen S Galea; Ken Dixon; Joanne O Crawford Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390