Literature DB >> 27797760

Improving cross-study prediction through addon batch effect adjustment or addon normalization.

Roman Hornung1, David Causeur2, Christoph Bernau3, Anne-Laure Boulesteix1.   

Abstract

Motivation: To date most medical tests derived by applying classification methods to high-dimensional molecular data are hardly used in clinical practice. This is partly because the prediction error resulting when applying them to external data is usually much higher than internal error as evaluated through within-study validation procedures. We suggest the use of addon normalization and addon batch effect removal techniques in this context to reduce systematic differences between external data and the original dataset with the aim to improve prediction performance.
Results: We evaluate the impact of addon normalization and seven batch effect removal methods on cross-study prediction performance for several common classifiers using a large collection of microarray gene expression datasets, showing that some of these techniques reduce prediction error. Availability and Implementation: All investigated addon methods are implemented in our R package bapred. Contact: hornung@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27797760     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  8 in total

1.  Detecting hidden batch factors through data-adaptive adjustment for biological effects.

Authors:  Haidong Yi; Ayush T Raman; Han Zhang; Genevera I Allen; Zhandong Liu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Application of multi-omics data integration and machine learning approaches to identify epigenetic and transcriptomic differences between in vitro and in vivo produced bovine embryos.

Authors:  Maria B Rabaglino; Alan O'Doherty; Jan Bojsen-Møller Secher; Patrick Lonergan; Poul Hyttel; Trudee Fair; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Batch adjustment by reference alignment (BARA): Improved prediction performance in biological test sets with batch effects.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Malin Lindstedt; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scalable Prediction of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using High-Dimensional Machine Learning and Blood Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Stefanie Warnat-Herresthal; Konstantinos Perrakis; Bernd Taschler; Matthias Becker; Kevin Baßler; Marc Beyer; Patrick Günther; Jonas Schulte-Schrepping; Lea Seep; Kathrin Klee; Thomas Ulas; Torsten Haferlach; Sach Mukherjee; Joachim L Schultze
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-12-18

5.  Downregulation of PIK3CB Involved in Alzheimer's Disease via Apoptosis, Axon Guidance, and FoxO Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Zhike Zhou; Jun Bai; Shanshan Zhong; Rongwei Zhang; Kexin Kang; Xiaoqian Zhang; Ying Xu; Chuansheng Zhao; Mei Zhao
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Predicting genotoxicity of viral vectors for stem cell gene therapy using gene expression-based machine learning.

Authors:  Adrian Schwarzer; Steven R Talbot; Anton Selich; Michael Morgan; Juliane W Schott; Oliver Dittrich-Breiholz; Antonella L Bastone; Bettina Weigel; Teng Cheong Ha; Violetta Dziadek; Rik Gijsbers; Adrian J Thrasher; Frank J T Staal; Hubert B Gaspar; Ute Modlich; Axel Schambach; Michael Rothe
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Single-center versus multi-center data sets for molecular prognostic modeling: a simulation study.

Authors:  Daniel Samaga; Roman Hornung; Herbert Braselmann; Julia Hess; Horst Zitzelsberger; Claus Belka; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Kristian Unger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Machine learning approach to integrated endometrial transcriptomic datasets reveals biomarkers predicting uterine receptivity in cattle at seven days after estrous.

Authors:  Maria B Rabaglino; Haja N Kadarmideen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.