Literature DB >> 27797559

A look into the future: Spontaneous anticipatory saccades reflect processes of anticipatory action control.

Christina U Pfeuffer1, Andrea Kiesel1, Lynn Huestegge2.   

Abstract

According to ideomotor theory, human action control uses anticipations of one's own actions' future consequences, that is, action effect anticipations, as a means of triggering actions that will produce desired outcomes (e.g., Hommel, Müsseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001). Using the response-effect compatibility paradigm (Kunde, 2001), we demonstrate that the anticipation of one's own manual actions' future consequences not only triggers appropriate (i.e., instructed) actions, but simultaneously induces spontaneous (uninstructed) anticipatory saccades to the location of future action consequences. In contrast to behavioral response-effect compatibility effects that have been linked to processes of action selection and action planning, our results suggest that these anticipatory saccades serve the function of outcome evaluation, that is, the comparison of expected/intended and observed action outcomes. Overall, our results demonstrate the informational value of additionally analyzing uninstructed behavioral components complementary to instructed responses and allow us to specify essential mechanisms of the complex interplay between the manual and oculomotor control system in goal-directed action control. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27797559     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

1.  Interaction of oculomotor and manual behavior: evidence from simulated driving in an approach-avoidance steering task.

Authors:  Norbert Schneider; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  The oculomotor signature of expected surprise.

Authors:  Dominika Drążyk; Marcus Missal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Current foveal inspection and previous peripheral preview influence subsequent eye movement decisions.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Artem V Belopolsky; Markus Lappe
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-13

4.  Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Markus Lappe; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.