Literature DB >> 27797361

Prostate cancer: Active surveillance appropriateness criteria - a way forward.

Svetlana Avulova1, Daniel A Barocas1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27797361     DOI： 10.1038/nrurol.2016.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN： 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul R Womble; James E Montie; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; Brian R Lane; David C Miller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  The appropriateness method has acceptable reliability and validity for assessing overuse and underuse of surgical procedures.

Authors:  Elise H Lawson; Melinda Maggard Gibbons; Clifford Y Ko; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Development of quality of care indicators for patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement.

Authors:  N F SooHoo; J R Lieberman; E Farng; S Park; S Jain; C Y Ko
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Defining surgical quality in gastric cancer: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.

Authors:  Savtaj Brar; Calvin Law; Robin McLeod; Lucy Helyer; Carol Swallow; Lawrence Paszat; Rajini Seevaratnam; Roberta Cardoso; Matthew Dixon; Alyson Mahar; Laercio G Lourenco; Lavanya Yohanathan; Alina Bocicariu; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Ian Chau; Neal Church; Daniel Coit; Christopher H Crane; Craig Earle; Paul Mansfield; Norman Marcon; Thomas Miner; Sung Hoon Noh; Geoff Porter; Mitchell C Posner; Vivek Prachand; Takeshi Sano; Cornelis van de Velde; Sandra Wong; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.

Authors:  Leonard P Bokhorst; Riccardo Valdagni; Antti Rannikko; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Tom Pickles; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael L Cher; Apoorv Dhir; Gregory B Auffenberg; Susan Linsell; Yuqing Gao; Bradley Rosenberg; S Mohammad Jafri; Laurence Klotz; David C Miller; Khurshid R Ghani; Steven J Bernstein; James E Montie; Brian R Lane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Impact of Adherence to Quality Measures for Localized Prostate Cancer on Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Treatment-related Complications.

Authors:  William Sohn; Matthew J Resnick; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sharon Phillips; Tatsuki Koyama; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Karen E Hoffman; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette M Stroup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.178
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.