Kathleen L Egan1,2,3, Eric Gregory4, Michael Sparks5, Mark Wolfson1,2. 1. a Department of Social Science and Health Policy , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 2. b Center for Research on Substance Use and Addiction , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 3. c Department of Public Health Education , University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro , NC , USA. 4. d Save Our Kids Coalition , Bowling Green , KY , USA. 5. e SparksIntiatives , Kihei , HI , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organized disposal of controlled medications, such as take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes, is a prevention strategy that has been widely used to reduce the availability of controlled medications for diversion or abuse. However, little is known as to whether this strategy actually reduces the overall availability of these medications for the purposes of diversion or abuse. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the number and types of controlled medications that were disposed through organized efforts to the number dispensed in local communities. METHODS: The quantity and type of controlled medication collected from three take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes over 4-week-long periods in five counties in south-central Kentucky was measured and compared to the number of controlled medications dispensed, as reported by Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting system. RESULTS: In 2013, 21,121,658 controlled medications units were dispensed in the participating counties. Of those, 46.9% were opioid analgesics, 13.1% tranquilizers, and 37.3% "other." During the assessment periods, a total of 21,503 controlled medication units were collected. Of those, 39.9% were opioid analgesics, 2.7% tranquilizers, and 57.4% "other." Annually, controlled medications disposed were estimated to account for 0.3% of those dispensed. CONCLUSION: Controlled medications collected by take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes constituted a miniscule proportion of the numbers dispensed. Our findings suggest that organized drug disposal efforts may have a minimal impact on reducing the availability of unused controlled medications at a community level.
BACKGROUND: Organized disposal of controlled medications, such as take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes, is a prevention strategy that has been widely used to reduce the availability of controlled medications for diversion or abuse. However, little is known as to whether this strategy actually reduces the overall availability of these medications for the purposes of diversion or abuse. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the number and types of controlled medications that were disposed through organized efforts to the number dispensed in local communities. METHODS: The quantity and type of controlled medication collected from three take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes over 4-week-long periods in five counties in south-central Kentucky was measured and compared to the number of controlled medications dispensed, as reported by Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting system. RESULTS: In 2013, 21,121,658 controlled medications units were dispensed in the participating counties. Of those, 46.9% were opioid analgesics, 13.1% tranquilizers, and 37.3% "other." During the assessment periods, a total of 21,503 controlled medication units were collected. Of those, 39.9% were opioid analgesics, 2.7% tranquilizers, and 57.4% "other." Annually, controlled medications disposed were estimated to account for 0.3% of those dispensed. CONCLUSION: Controlled medications collected by take-back events and permanent drug donation boxes constituted a miniscule proportion of the numbers dispensed. Our findings suggest that organized drug disposal efforts may have a minimal impact on reducing the availability of unused controlled medications at a community level.
Authors: Amy E Lawrence; Katherine J Deans; Deena J Chisolm; Sharon K Wrona; Peter C Minneci; Jennifer N Cooper Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Frances A Farley; John Grant; Alan R Tait; Carol J Boyd; Sean Esteban McCabe; Monica Weber; Calista M Harbagh; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kathleen L Egan; Eric Gregory; Mark Wolfson; Vincent T Francisco; Robert W Strack; David L Wyrick; Michael A Perko Journal: J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse Date: 2019-04-22
Authors: Josh Bleicher; Zachary Fender; Jordan E Johnson; Brian T Cain; Kathy Phan; Damien Powers; Guo Wei; Angela P Presson; Alvin Kwok; T Bartley Pickron; Courtney L Scaife; Lyen C Huang Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 3.125
Authors: Kathleen L Egan; Mark Wolfson; William N Dudley; Vincent T Francisco; Robert W Strack; David L Wyrick; Michael A Perko Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Laura Van Metre Baum; Emilie Bruzelius; Mathew V Kiang; Keith Humphreys; Sanjay Basu; Aaron Baum Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Pierre-Marie Morice; Joachim Alexandre; Alexandre Cesbron; Marion Sassier; Sophie Fedrizzi; Xavier Humbert Journal: Drug Saf Case Rep Date: 2017-12