Literature DB >> 27796815

Assessment of endothelial shear stress in patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses using coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Dexiao Huang1, Takashi Muramatsu2, Yingguang Li3, Wenjie Yang4, Yasuomi Nagahara2, Miao Chu5, Pieter Kitslaar3, Masayoshi Sarai2, Yukio Ozaki2, Yiannis S Chatzizisis6, Fuhua Yan4, Johan H C Reiber3, Renhua Wu7, Jun Pu8, Shengxian Tu5.   

Abstract

Characterization of endothelial shear stress (ESS) may allow for prediction of the progression of atherosclerosis. The aim of this investigation was to develop a non-invasive approach for in vivo assessment of ESS by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to compare it with ESS derived from invasive coronary angiography (ICA). A total of 41 patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses who underwent both CTA and ICA were included in the analysis. Two geometrical models of the interrogated vessels were reconstructed separately from CTA and ICA images. Subsequently, computational fluid dynamics were applied to calculate the ESS, from which ESSCTA and ESSICA were derived, respectively. Comparisons between ESSCTA and ESSICA were performed on 163 segments of 57 vessels in the CTA and ICA models. ESSCTA and ESSICA were similar: mean ESS: 4.97 (4.37-5.57) Pascal versus 4.86 (4.27-5.44) Pascal, p = 0.58; minimal ESS: 0.86 (0.67-1.05) Pascal versus 0.79 (0.63-0.95) Pascal, p = 0.37; and maximal ESS: 14.50 (12.62-16.38) Pascal versus 13.76 (11.44-16.08) Pascal, p = 0.44. Good correlations between the ESSCTA and the ESSICA were observed for the mean (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), minimal (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and maximal (r = 0.62, p < 0.001) ESS values. In conclusion, geometrical reconstruction by CTA yields similar results to ICA in terms of segment-based ESS calculation in patients with low and intermediate stenoses. Thus, it has the potential of allowing combined local hemodynamic and plaque morphologic information for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Coronary computed tomography angiography; Endothelial shear stress; Invasive coronary angiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796815     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1003-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

1.  Branch angle and flow into a symmetric bifurcation.

Authors:  Mehran Tadjfar
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Reversal of flow between serial bifurcation lesions: insights from computational fluid dynamic analysis in a population-based phantom model.

Authors:  Peter Barlis; Eric K W Poon; Vikas Thondapu; Maik J Grundeken; Shengxian Tu; Umair Hayat; Andrew Ooi; Stephen Moore; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Emanuele Barbato; Zsolt Köszegi; Junqing Yang; Zhonghua Sun; Niels R Holm; Balázs Tar; Yingguang Li; Dan Rusinaru; William Wijns; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  In-vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  Thomas Frauenfelder; Evangelos Boutsianis; Thomas Schertler; Lars Husmann; Sebastian Leschka; Dimos Poulikakos; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Hyung-Bok Park; Ran Heo; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; Iksung Cho; Heidi Gransar; Ryo Nakazato; Jonathon Leipsic; G B John Mancini; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hiromasa Otake; Matthew J Budoff; Daniel S Berman; Andrejs Erglis; Hyuk-Jae Chang; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01

Review 7.  Localization of atherosclerosis: role of hemodynamics.

Authors:  S G Frangos; V Gahtan; B Sumpio
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-10

8.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Sadako Motoyama; Masayoshi Sarai; Hiroto Harigaya; Hirofumi Anno; Kaori Inoue; Tomonori Hara; Hiroyuki Naruse; Junichi Ishii; Hitoshi Hishida; Nathan D Wong; Renu Virmani; Takeshi Kondo; Yukio Ozaki; Jagat Narula
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prediction of the localization of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study.

Authors:  Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Michael Jonas; Ahmet U Coskun; Roy Beigel; Benjamin V Stone; Charles Maynard; Ross G Gerrity; William Daley; Campbell Rogers; Elazer R Edelman; Charles L Feldman; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Liang Xu; Jurgen Ligthart; Bo Xu; Karen Witberg; Zhongwei Sun; Gerhard Koning; Johan H C Reiber; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  4 in total

1.  Whence we came, whither we go?

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Tim P van de Hoef; Young-Hak Kim; Javier Escaned; William Wijns
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Coronary computed tomography angiography-based endothelial wall shear stress in normal coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jussi Schultz; Inge J van den Hoogen; Jurrien H Kuneman; Michiel A de Graaf; Vasileios Kamperidis; Alexander Broersen; J Wouter Jukema; Antonis Sakellarios; Sotirios Nikopoulos; Konstantina Tsarapatsani; Katerina Naka; Lampros Michalis; Dimitrios I Fotiadis; Teemu Maaniitty; Antti Saraste; Jeroen J Bax; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Vande Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.