Literature DB >> 27796705

Is video laryngoscopy really superior to direct laryngoscopy for emergency intubation in prehospital trauma patients?

Fu-Shan Xue1, Ya-Yang Liu2, Hui-Xian Li2, Gui-Zhen Yang2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27796705     DOI： 10.1007/s11739-016-1566-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN： 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Tracheal intubation in daylight and in the dark: a randomised comparison of the Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin.

Authors:  H Ueshima; T Asai
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting.

Authors:  Takahiro Arima; Osamu Nagata; Takeshi Miura; Katsuki Ikeda; Tomoya Mizushima; Azusa Takahashi; Koji Sakaida
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildirim; Hasan A Kiraz; İbrahim Ağaoğlu; Okhan Akdur
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Degrees of reality: airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers.

Authors:  Karl Schebesta; Michael Hüpfl; Bernhard Rössler; Helmut Ringl; Michael P Müller; Oliver Kimberger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Helmut Trimmel; Janett Kreutziger; Robert Fitzka; Stephan Szüts; Christoph Derdak; Elisabeth Koch; Boris Erwied; Wolfgang G Voelckel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.598
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.