| Literature DB >> 27796345 |
Weiqi Han1, Wei He1, Wanlei Yang1, Jianlei Li1, Zhifan Yang1, Xuanyuan Lu1, An Qin2, Yu Qian1.
Abstract
Bone callus, generated during fracture healing, is commonly discarded during surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the osteogenic potential of bone callus and its possible use as autograft material for <hemical">span class="Species">patients needing bone grafts. Histology, immunohistochemistry, micro-computed tomography, and biomechanics were performed to examine osteogenic cells, osteoinductive factors, and the osteoconductive structure of bone callus. Alkaline phosphatase-positive osteoblasts, osteoinductive factors (including BMP2, FGF2, TGFB1, and IGF1), and a porous structure were found in bone callus. Early-stage callus (within 3 months after fracture) presented significantly improved osteogenic properties compared to medium- (3-9 months) and late-stage (longer than 9 months) callus. The results revealed that bone callus induced new bone formation in a nude mouse model. Early-stage callus showed better performance to medium- and late-stage callus in the induction of new bone formation at both 8 and 12 weeks. These findings indicated that bone callus, especially early-stage callus, possesses osteogenic potential and can potentially serve as an alternative source of material for bone grafts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27796345 PMCID: PMC5087090 DOI: 10.1038/srep36330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Bone callus formation at the fracture site (black arrows).
(a) Anteroposterior and lateral radiographic views of malunion after plaster fixation in the EC group (b) Broken plates after internal fixation in the MC group (c) Nonunions after internal fixation in the LC group (d) Quantitative gray values of bone callus versus time of callus formation.
Figure 2Histological evaluation of the number and activity of osteoblasts.
(a1–a4) H&E staining revealed osteoblasts (black arrows) along the edge of the bone trabeculae (b1–b4) Active osteoblasts were stained for ALP (white arrows). Quantitative analyses showing the number of osteoblasts per unit of tissue area, N.Ob/T.Ar (/mm2) (c) in bone callus; the two black horizontal lines in each graph represent the upper and lower 95% confidence limits of the number and activity of osteoblasts in the CI.
Figure 3Expression of the osteoinductive factors BMP2, FGF2, TGFB1, and IGF1 in bone callus.
Immunohistochemistry-positive areas for BMP2 (a1–a4), FGF2 (b1–b4), TGFB1 (c1–c4), and IGF1 (d1–d4) were observed as brown-black particles (black arrows).
Figure 4Microstructure of bone callus.
H&E staining (a1–a4) and micro-CT scanning (b1–b4) showing internal connections and porous structure of the bone callus. (c1–c4) Two-dimensional analyses of BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp in H&E stained sections (d1–d4) Three-dimensional analysis of porosity, Tb.N, Tb.Th, and Tb.Sp observed by micro-CT; the two black horizontal lines in each graph represent the upper and lower 95% confidence interval of each parameter in the CI.
Figure 5Bone biomechanics.
(a) Representative load-displacement curves of bone callus obtained in the compression biomechanics test; ultimate load (b) and elastic modulus (c) of bone callus.
Figure 6New bone formation induced by bone callus in nude mice as assessed by histomorphometry.
A trabecula-like pattern of new bone formation was detected by H&E staining at 8 (a1–a4) and 12 (c1–c4) weeks post-implantation. New bone (NB) area stained green in Masson staining at 8 (b1–b4) and 12 (d1–d4) weeks after implantation; quantitative analyses of NB area (e), Tb.N (f), Tb.Th (g), and Tb.Sp (h), based on Masson staining; *P < 0.05 versus the CI group by one-way analysis of variance and Least Significance Difference (LSD) test post hoc.
Figure 7New bone formation induced by bone callus in nude mice assessed by micro-CT.
Images showing three-dimensional reconstructions of regions of interest (3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm each) in implants at 8 (a1–a4) and 12 (b1–b4) weeks after implantation; the ΔBV/TV (c1), ΔTb.N (c2), ΔTb.Th (c3), and ΔTb.Sp (c4) values between the parameters at 8 or 12 weeks post-implantation and these parameters before implantation; *P < 0.05 versus the CI group using one-way analysis of variance and LSD test post hoc.
Donor characteristics.
| Group | Cases, n | Age (years) | Sex (cases, n) | Drawn parts (cases, n) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | Femur | Tibia | Humerus | |||
| CI | 11 | 45.7 ± 8.4 | 5 | 6 | — | — | — |
| EC | 13 | 45.5 ± 7.7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| MC | 12 | 46.3 ± 5.9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| LC | 16 | 45.6 ± 6.4 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| P value | — | 0.991 | 0.895 | 0.941 | |||
Group differences were analysed by Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test.