Literature DB >> 27796337

Phenotype-genotype correlation in multiple primary lung cancer patients in China.

Yang Yang1, Wei Yin2, Wenxin He1, Chao Jiang1, Xiao Zhou1, Xiao Song1, Junjie Zhu1, Ke Fei1, Weijun Cao3, Gening Jiang1.   

Abstract

Due to recent advances in high-resolution detection technology, multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is becoming an increasingly common diagnosis. However, the genotype-phenotype correlations in MPLC patients have not yet been assessed. In this study, we analyzed the clinical and pathological data for 129 consecutive MPLC patients who received curative surgery at the Tongji University Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, China. We have screened 129 patients in the present study and found mutations in EGFR, BRAF, ROS1 and KRAS genes, as well as the rearrangement of the EML4-ALK gene in 113 patients. The mean patient age was 59.9 (25-78) years old and 41 patients were males (31.8%). Among the total patients, 123 (95.4%) had two primary lesions, 5 (3.9%) had three primary lesions, and 1 (0.8%) had four primary lesions. In 38.8% of the patients, all lesions were located on only one side of the body. Most of the detected mutations (98 patients) were in the EGFR gene. The patients exhibited significant differences in the EGFR mutation, age at diagnosis, and foci location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796337      PMCID: PMC5087074          DOI: 10.1038/srep36177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) refers to the synchronous or metachronous appearance of more than one primary lung cancer in a single patient. MPLC was first reported in 19241. In recent years, the rate of diagnosis worldwide has rapidly increased due to the improvement in radiological diagnostic procedures such as high-resolution multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)2345. However, preoperative diagnosis can be problematic because it is often difficult to differentiate MPLC from lung cancer metastasis based on radiological and histopathological criteria alone. Identification of oncologic biomarkers by molecular genetic analysis may aid in the accurate diagnosis of MPLC. Potential oncologic biomarkers for analysis include allelic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) markers and specific gene mutations56789101112. Recent advances in tumor molecular biology have resulted in the identification of several candidate markers such as P5313 and the EGFR gene14 that can be used for MPLC diagnosis. In addition, several genes have been confirmed to be driver genes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT1), B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ERBB2), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA)151617181920. However, current knowledge of the molecular characteristics of MPLC is insufficient to allow for validation of the accuracy and sensitivity of molecular diagnosis. In this study, we screened for mutations in several oncogenic driver genes in a cohort of Chinese MPLC patients and analyzed the data to correlate our genetic findings with the clinical phenotypes.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki, and it was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Tongji University Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, China. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study. The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Patients and specimen collection

From May 2011 to January 2015, 129 consecutive NSCLC patients with MLPC received surgical resection of their lung lesions at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Post-operative histological analyses confirmed the presence of primary lung cancer in all patients. Fresh primary tumor tissues containing more than 50% tumor cells were collected from all patients during surgery and were used for subsequent gene mutation analyses. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the patient notes and computer records, including age, gender, the tumor size and location, the TNM stage and the histological type.

Candidate gene mutation analysis

Genomic DNA and the total RNA were immediately extracted from fresh tissues using a commercial QIAamp DNA Tissue Kit and RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Germany), respectively. Mutations in the EGFR, BRAF, ROS1 and KRAS genes as well as the rearrangement of EML4-ALK were detected with Amoy Diagnostics kits (Xiamen, China) utilizing proprietary real-time PCR technology to detect mutations in the target genes.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (Version 18.0, Chicago, IL). The Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA were used to detect associations between the clinical characteristics and studied genes. A P value of <0.05 was regarded as being significant.

Results

Demographic and Clinical characteristics

This cohort study included 41 male and 88 female patients,. The mean age was 59.9 (25–83) years old (Fig. 1). All the 5 youngest patients (<40 years) were females. A total of 299 foci were removed during the surgery. All lesions were detected simultaneously in each patient (Fig. 2). In total, 123 patients (95.35%) had two lesions, 5 patients (3.88%) had three lesions and 1 patient (0.78%) had four lesions. In 50 patients (38.8%), all the tumors were located on the same side. Most of the tumors were detected at an early stage, including 26 foci (8.70%) at the Tis stage (Fig. 3). Multiple lesions with an identical histological type were recorded in 88 patients, whereas multiple lesions with different histological types were detected in the other 41 patients.
Figure 1

The age distribution of the 129 MPLC patients analyzed.

Figure 2

CT scan images for two MPLC patients.

(A) Images of Patient I. Left, CT scan of upper right lobi pulmonis; and right, CT scan of lower right lobi pulmonis. (B) Images of Patient II. Left, CT scan of upper right lobi pulmonis; and right, CT scan of middle right lobi pulmonis.

Figure 3

The TNM stages profile of these MPLC patients.

Mutation spectrum

Mutations in the EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ROS1 genes and the rearrangement of EML4-ALK were detected in 113 patients (87.6%). Most of the patients (98) had EGFR mutations. No mutations were detected in 8 (19.5%) male and 8 (9.1%) female patients, and mutations in two genes were identified in 10 patients (Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4). A total of 12 subtypes of EGFR gene mutations were identified, including 6 types of complicated mutations. Complicated mutations (L858R/S768I, L858R/20ins, G719X/T790M, 19del/T790M, 19del/L858R and 19del/20ins) were only found in female patients, whereas the mutation spectrum of the male patients was relatively simple. Only exon 19del and L858R mutations were detected in the male patients (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 1

The distribution of gene mutations among 129 patients.

 Male Female 
EGFR2458.54%6472.73%
KRAS717.07%33.41%
BRAF00.00%33.41%
ROS100.00%11.14%
EML4-ALK12.44%00.00%
EGFR + KRAS12.44%22.27%
EGFR + EML4-ALK00.00%66.82%
EGFR + ROS100.00%11.14%
No mutation in the above genes819.51%89.09%
Table 2

Details of somatic mutations in EGFR, BRAF and KRAS genes analyzed in this study.

GeneMutationExonBase Change
EGFR
 G719A182156G > C
 G719S182155G > A
 G719C182155G > T
 E746_A750del (1)192235_2249del15
 E746_A750del (2)192236_2250del15
 L747_P753 > S192240_2257del18
 E746_T751 > I192235_2252 > AAT(complex)
 E746_T751del192236_2253del18
 E746_T751 > A192237_2251del15
 E746_S752 > A192237_2254del18
 E746_S752 > V192237_2250 > T(complex)
 E746_S752 > D192238_2255del18
 L747_A750 > P192238_2248 > GC(complex)
 L747_T751 > Q192238_2252 > GCA(complex)
 L747_E749del192239_2247del9
 L747_T751del192239_2253del15
 L747_S752del192239_2256del18
 L747_A750 > P192239_2248TTAAGAGAAG > C (complex)
 L747_P753 > Q192239_2258 > CA (complex)
 L747_T751 > S192240_2251del12
 L747_T751del192240_2254del15
 L747_T751 > P192239_2251 > C (complex)
 T790M202369C > T
 S768I202303G > T
 H773_V774insH202319_2320insCAC
 D770_N771insG202310_2311insGGT
 V769_D770insASV202307_2308insgccagcgtg
 L858R212573T > G
 L861Q212582T > A
KRAS
 Gly12Asp GGT > GA T
 Gly12Ala GGT > GCT
 Gly12Val GGT > GTT
 Gly12Ser GGT > AGT
 Gly12Arg GGT > CGT
 Gly12Cys GGT > TGT
 Gly13Asp GGC > GAC
BRAF
 V600E151799T > A
Table 3

EML4-ALK fusions detected in this study.

Alternate nameEML4 spliced exonBreakpoint variety (bp)*ALK spliced exon
EML4-ALK variant 113−/−/ins69/−/−/−20
EML4-ALK variant 3a/b6−/−/ins33/−20
EML4-ALK variant 220−/−/ins18/−20
EML4-ALK variant 415del7120
EML4-ALK variant 4′14ins11del49/del12/del3620
EML4-ALK variant 5′1820
EML4-ALK variant 5a/b2−/ins11720
/17ins6820

*Differing breakpoints result in different cDNA isoforms: ins indicates insertion, and del indicates deletion.

Table 4

ROS1 gene fusions detected in this study.

Alternate nameFused geneROS1 spliced sites
ROS1-1SLC34A2 exon 4ROS1 exon 32
SLC34A2 exon 4ROS1 exon 34
ROS1-2SLC34A2 exon 13ROS1 exon 32
SLC34A2 exon 13ROS1 exon 34
ROS1-3CD74 exon 6ROS1 exon 32
CD74 exon 6ROS1 exon 34
ROS1-4SDC exon 2ROS1 exon 32
SDC exon 2ROS1 exon 34
ROS1-5SDC exon 4ROS1 exon 32
SDC exon 4ROS1 exon 34
EZR exon 10ROS1 exon 34
ROS1-6TPM3 exon 8ROS1 exon 35
LRIG3 exon 16ROS1 exon 35
ROS17FIG exon 8ROS1 exon 35
FIG exon 4ROS1 exon 36
Table 5

The clinicopathological characteristics of the male MPLC patients.

 19del + L858R19del + WTL858RL858R + WTWT
Age
 <300.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
 <400.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
 <5020.00%33.33%0.00%0.00%12.50%
 <6020.00%33.33%40.00%57.14%25.00%
 <7040.00%33.33%40.00%42.86%37.50%
 <800.00%0.00%10.00%0.00%25.00%
 >8020.00%0.00%10.00%0.00%0.00%
Site
 Left60.00%33.33%35.00%42.86%50.00%
 Right40.00%66.67%65.00%57.14%50.00%
Pathology
 Lung adenocarcinoma90.00%66.67%95.00%85.71%81.25%
 Squamous carcinoma10.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.63%
 Large cell carcinoma0.00%0.00%0.00%7.14%3.13%
 Atypical hyperplasia of adenoma0.00%33.33%5.00%7.14%0.00%
TNM stage
 Tis0.00%0.00%5.00%14.29%9.38%
 Ia70.00%16.67%60.00%50.00%53.13%
 Ib30.00%83.33%25.00%35.71%34.38%
 IIb0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.13%
 IIIa0.00%0.00%10.00%0.00%0.00%
Table 6

The clinicopathological characteristics of the female MPLC patients.

 19del19del + L858R19del + rare mutation19del + WTL858R + rare mutationL858RL858R + WTG719X20ins + WTWT
Age
 <300.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%
 <400.00%0.00%33.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.53%
 <500.00%0.00%33.33%9.09%0.00%0.00%16.67%0.00%0.00%31.58%
 <6050.00%25.00%0.00%36.36%50.00%23.08%25.00%100.00%100.00%42.11%
 <7050.00%50.00%0.00%45.45%33.33%53.85%41.67%0.00%0.00%15.79%
 <800.00%25.00%33.33%9.09%16.67%23.08%8.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Site
 Left33.33%15.79%50.00%43.48%43.75%38.46%42.31%0.00%0.00%48.72%
 Right66.67%84.21%50.00%56.52%56.25%61.54%57.69%100.00%100.00%51.28%
Pathology
 Adenocarcinoma100.00%100.00%83.33%78.26%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%89.74%
 Squamous carcinoma0.00%0.00%16.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
 Atypical hyperplasia of adenoma0.00%0.00%0.00%21.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.26%
TNM stage
 Tis0.00%0.00%0.00%9.09%0.00%7.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.79%
 Ia66.67%75.00%66.67%54.55%83.33%23.08%91.67%100.00%100.00%68.42%
 Ib33.33%25.00%33.33%27.27%0.00%46.15%8.33%0.00%0.00%15.79%
 Ia + Ib0.00%0.00%0.00%9.09%16.67%23.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Phenotype-genotype correlation in MPLC patients

After determining the MPLC patient genotypes, we analyzed the phenotype-genotype correlations among these individuals. Significant differences were detected between the presence of EGFR mutations and the age at diagnosis and foci location (Table 7). Rare EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, T790M and L861Q) were detected in 18 female patients. These rare mutations were accompanied by common mutations (L858R, exon 19del and exon 20ins) in multiple lesions. Among the lesions with L858R and a rare mutation, 6.25% were mucinous adenocarcinomas, whereas 62.5% were invasive adenocarcinomas. Further, 31.25% of these lesions were located in left upper lobe. Notably, none of the young patients had these rare mutations.
Table 7

Correlation between EGFR mutations and clinicopathological features.

 EGFR mutation
P value
PositiveNegative
Gender  0.2035
 Male2516 
 Female6919 
Age  0.0236
 <604622 
 ≥604813 
Location  0.0456
 Left7335 
 Right10936 
Pathology  0.2781
 Adenocarcinoma17066 
 Squamous carcinoma20 
 Large cell carcinoma94 
 Atypical hyperplasia of adenoma11 
TNM stage  0.0869
 <Ib11252 
 ≥Ib7018 

Discussion

The etiology of MPLC remains unclear. At present, the field cancerization theory is the most common explanation12. The accurate preoperative diagnosis of MPLC can be problematic. Hitherto, differentiating between MPLC and lung metastases in patient with multi-focal lung cancer has mainly depended on morphological methods. The diagnostic criteria for MPLC recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) are as follows: (1) the presence of anatomically separated tumors with the same histology, with the cancers in different lobes, no N2 or N3 involvement, and no systemic metastases; (2) the presence of temporally separated tumors with the same histology, with a 4-yr interval between cancers and no systemic metastases from any of the cancers; and (3) the presence of tumors with different histologies, including tumors with different histologic types and different molecular genetic characteristics or tumors arising separately from in situ carcinoma foci212223. In spite of these difficulties, it remains critical to distinguish between primary and metastatic lung cancer because the long-term survival of these two types of cancer is significantly different. Metastatic lung cancers, especially in patients with multiple metastases, should not be resected as the prognosis is extremely poor. On the other hand, most MPLC patients have separate lesions that are each individually at an early stage. The 5-year survival rate for synchronous MPLC after curative surgery could be as high as 75.8%24. Therefore, the proper diagnsis of MPLC is key to the appropriate treatment of patients. Molecular genetic diagnosis was introduced into the diagnostic criteria for ACCP in 2013; however, the lack of effective molecular markers has limited its clinical application in practice. Hence, there is a pressing need for comprehensive phenotypic and genotypic analyses of MPLC patients. Multiple factors can contribute to the development of MPLC, including genetic factors, smoking and exposure to environmental pollutants. Previous studies3 have shown that MPLC is more common in 50- to 70-year-old male smokers; most tumors in these patients have been reported to be squamous carcinoma-squamous carcinoma, squamous carcinoma-adenocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma-adenocarcinoma. In contrast with these data, our findings suggests that MPLC is more common in females, although they confirm that 50- to 70-year-old patients represent the highest-risk age group. In our study, we screened for mutations in the EGFR, BRAF, ROS1 and KRAS genes, as well as the rearrangement of the EML4-ALK gene. Since the direct sequencing of nucleotides is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process2526, we used a real-time PCR-based method to analyze these mutations. Both previous studies and our experience suggested that a real-time PCR-based method would detect the mutations of interest with the same efficiency as direct sequencing27282930. Only 13.95% of the patients screened were found to be free from any mutations in the genes analyzed in the present study. The frequency of EGFR gene mutations (76.1% in the female patients and 61.0% in the male patients) was higher in our study than that reported in Chinese lung cancer patients with a single focus3132. Furthermore, only 30 (32.6%) of the MPLC patients had identical gene mutations. These data suggest that more than half of second primary lung cancers result from different mechanisms compared with primary cancers. In addition, a previous study indicated that the risk of second primary lung cancers in patients treated with surgical resection for stage I NSCLC is 1.99 per 100 patient-years33. Based on these results, we conclude that each MPLC lesion should be independently diagnosed and treated by surgical resection. Our results suggested that rare mutations in the EGFR gene contributed significantly to the diversity of mutations detected in female patients. Although these data provide evidence of genotype-phenotype correlations in MPLC patients, further study involving more patients will be needed to confirm these conclusions.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Yang, Y. et al. Phenotype-genotype correlation in multiple primary lung cancer patients in China. Sci. Rep. 6, 36177; doi: 10.1038/srep36177 (2016). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  32 in total

1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in lung cancer: searching for the ideal method.

Authors:  William Pao; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Increase EGFR Mutations Detection Rate in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Real-Time PCR Screening Followed by Direct Sequencing.

Authors:  Tze-Kiong Er; Chin-Wen Lin; Ta-Chih Liu; Chih-Chieh Chen; Li-Hsuan Wang; Li-Ling Hsieh; Wen-Chan Tsai
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  The origins of multiple squamous cell carcinomas in the aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  M G van Oijen; F G Leppers Vd Straat; M G Tilanus; P J Slootweg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Mutations in the DDR2 kinase gene identify a novel therapeutic target in squamous cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter S Hammerman; Martin L Sos; Alex H Ramos; Chunxiao Xu; Amit Dutt; Wenjun Zhou; Lear E Brace; Brittany A Woods; Wenchu Lin; Jianming Zhang; Xianming Deng; Sang Min Lim; Stefanie Heynck; Martin Peifer; Jeffrey R Simard; Michael S Lawrence; Robert C Onofrio; Helga B Salvesen; Danila Seidel; Thomas Zander; Johannes M Heuckmann; Alex Soltermann; Holger Moch; Mirjam Koker; Frauke Leenders; Franziska Gabler; Silvia Querings; Sascha Ansén; Elisabeth Brambilla; Christian Brambilla; Philippe Lorimier; Odd Terje Brustugun; Aslaug Helland; Iver Petersen; Joachim H Clement; Harry Groen; Wim Timens; Hannie Sietsma; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; David G Beer; Ming Sound Tsao; Megan Hanna; Charles Hatton; Michael J Eck; Pasi A Janne; Bruce E Johnson; Wendy Winckler; Heidi Greulich; Adam J Bass; Jeonghee Cho; Daniel Rauh; Nathanael S Gray; Kwok-Kin Wong; Eric B Haura; Roman K Thomas; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and real-time PCR in the detection of EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor material of non-small cell lung carcinoma-superiority of NGS.

Authors:  Katja Tuononen; Satu Mäki-Nevala; Virinder Kaur Sarhadi; Aino Wirtanen; Mikko Rönty; Kaisa Salmenkivi; Jenny M Andrews; Aino I Telaranta-Keerie; Sari Hannula; Sonja Lagström; Pekka Ellonen; Aija Knuuttila; Sakari Knuutila
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  The risk of second primary tumors after resection of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David Rice; Hyung-Woo Kim; Anita Sabichi; Scott Lippman; J Jack Lee; Brendell Williams; Ara Vaporciyan; W Roy Smythe; Stephen Swisher; Garrett Walsh; Joe B Putnam; Waun Ki Hong; Jack Roth
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer.

Authors:  Kengo Takeuchi; Manabu Soda; Yuki Togashi; Ritsuro Suzuki; Seiji Sakata; Satoko Hatano; Reimi Asaka; Wakako Hamanaka; Hironori Ninomiya; Hirofumi Uehara; Young Lim Choi; Yukitoshi Satoh; Sakae Okumura; Ken Nakagawa; Hiroyuki Mano; Yuichi Ishikawa
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Rapid KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and PIK3CA mutation analysis of fine needle aspirates from non-small-cell lung cancer using allele-specific qPCR.

Authors:  Ronald van Eijk; Jappe Licht; Melanie Schrumpf; Mehrdad Talebian Yazdi; Dina Ruano; Giusi I Forte; Petra M Nederlof; Maud Veselic; Klaus F Rabe; Jouke T Annema; Vincent Smit; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  EML4-ALK fusion gene in Korean non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Guang Jin; Hyo-Sung Jeon; Eung Bae Lee; Hyo-Gyoung Kang; Seung Soo Yoo; Shin Yup Lee; Jae Hee Lee; Sung Ick Cha; Tae In Park; Chang Ho Kim; Sang Hoon Jheon; Jae Yong Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  PIK3CA mutations frequently coexist with EGFR/KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and suggest poor prognosis in EGFR/KRAS wildtype subgroup.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Haichuan Hu; Yunjian Pan; Rui Wang; Yuan Li; Lei Shen; Yongfu Yu; Hang Li; Deng Cai; Yihua Sun; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Immunotherapy and molecular role of T-cell in PD-1 antibody treated resectable lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Samaresh Sau; Arun K Iyer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Mechanisms of resistance to irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and therapeutic strategies in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Jinghui Wang; Shucai Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-22

3.  E3 ubiquitin ligase, RNF139, inhibits the progression of tongue cancer.

Authors:  Lina Wang; Wei Yin; Chun Shi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Inhibition of cell-adhesion protein DPYSL3 promotes metastasis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yan Jiang; Dong Xie; Ming Liu; Nan Song; Junjie Zhu; Jiang Fan; Chenfang Zhu
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2018-03-07

5.  [Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancer Dignosed 
by Different Phenotype-genotype: A Case Report and Literature Review].

Authors:  Xin Li; Zhirong Zhang; Yili Fu; Jinbai Miao; Bin Hu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2017-12-20

6.  Different driver gene mutations in patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: a case report.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Xiaofeng Xie; Gening Jiang; Hongcheng Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Unusual synchronous double primary treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma harboring T790M and L858R mutations in early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Fu Weng; Po-Ju Chen; Ailun Heather Tseng; Shih-Hung Huang; Henry Hsin-Chung Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and a Potential Treatment Strategy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nagano; Motoko Tachihara; Yoshihiro Nishimura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Current strategies and opportunities to manufacture cells for modeling human lungs.

Authors:  Ratna Varma; John P Soleas; Thomas K Waddell; Golnaz Karoubi; Alison P McGuigan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  3D radiomics predicts EGFR mutation, exon-19 deletion and exon-21 L858R mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guixue Liu; Zhihan Xu; Yingqian Ge; Beibei Jiang; Harry Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Xueqian Xie
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.