Boon-Lock Chia1. 1. Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block Level 9, 1E Kent Ridge Road,, Singapore, 119228 Singapore ; Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Of all the non-arrhythmic electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, ST segment elevation (ST elevation) is the most important with regard to diagnosis, prognosis and management.
Of all the non-arrhythmic electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, ST segment elevation (ST elevation) is the most important with regard to diagnosis, prognosis and management.
Of all the non-arrhythmic electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, ST segment elevation (ST elevation) is the most important with regard to diagnosis, prognosis and management.
ST Segment
The J point is defined as the junction of the end of the QRS complex and the onset of the ST segment. The ST segment is between the J point and the onset of the T wave. If the J point is elevated or depressed with reference to the isoelectric line, which is defined as the baseline formed by the TP segment, the ST segment is diagnosed to be elevated or depressed respectively (Fig
). During significant sinus tachycardia, the ST segment is absent because the P wave is superimposed on the preceding T wave. The horizontal level at the end of the PR segment now becomes the isoelectric line.
Fig. 1
Diagram showing the various ECG complexes, segments and time intervals. J Pt = J point.
Diagram showing the various ECG complexes, segments and time intervals. J Pt = J point.Causes of ST Segment Elevation
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Anterior and inferior STEMI is approximately equal in their incidence. In the hyperacute phase of STEMI (first 6-12 hours), concave or straight-upward ST elevation is seen. Tall T waves are also frequently present. The ST elevation is convex and dome shaped in the fully evolved stage when Q waves and deep T wave inversion have evolved about 24 hours after the onset of infarction.ST elevation in certain leads suggests the occurrence of STEMI in specific areas of the heart. For example, in anterior STEMI, ST elevation in leads V1 to V4 indicates anteroseptal/apical infarction, in leads V5 and V6 anterolateral and in leads I and aVL high lateral infarction of the left ventricle. In anterior STEMI, the culprit artery is most frequently the left anterior descending artery (Fig.
) and very rarely the left main coronary artery.
Fig. 2
“Hyperacute phase” of anterior STEMI in a 51-year-old man. Note: (1) Markedly elevated ST segments (concave upwards) in V2 to V6, l and aVL ( arrowheads in V2, V3 and aVL) merging with tall T waves in V2 to V4 (ST segment elevation and T wave in V2 = 10 mm and 20 mm respectively). (2) Reciprocal ST segment depression in II, III and AVF (arrowhead in III). Intravenous streptokinase therapy was given. Subsequent coronary angiography revealed a 90% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. (Reproduced with permission. Poh KK, HC Tan, Teo SG. ECG ST segment elevation in patients with chest pain. Sing Med J
2011; 5(1): 3 [with adaptation]).
In inferior STEMI, ST elevation is seen in leads II, III and aVF indicating infarction of the inferior wall of the left ventricle. The right coronary artery (Fig.
) is the culprit artery in about 80% and the left circumflex artery in about 20% of cases (Fig.
). In patients with inferior STEMI, posterior STEMI is seen frequently and right ventricular infarction in about 40% of cases. In the latter situation, the culprit artery is the right coronary artery and the site of lesion is the proximal segment of the artery before the origin of the right ventricular branch. Right-sided chest leads to diagnose right ventricular infarction must therefore be routinely performed in all cases when the initial 12-lead ECG shows inferior STEMI1
(Fig.
).
Fig. 3
ECG showing (i) ST elevation in II, III (arrows in both) and aVF and reciprocal ST depression in I and aVL (arrow in aVL) indicating inferior STEMI (ii) ST depression in V2 (arrow) and V3 indicating posterior STEMI. In patients presenting with inferior STEMI, if the ST elevation in III is greater than that in II (as is see in this ECG), the culprit artery is most likely the right coronary artery (Reference 3) and less frequently a dominant circumflex artery. However, the presence of right ventricular infarction in this patient as indicated by ST elevation in V4R (arrow), V5R and V6R confirms that the culprit artery is the right coronary artery (proximal segment).
Fig. 4
ECG showing inferior STEMI indicated by ST elevation in II, III (arrows in both) and aVF and posterior STEMI (indicated by ST elevation in V7, V8 (arrow) and V9 and ST depression in V1-V2 [arrows]). The ST segment in I (arrow) is isoelectric.
In inferior STEMI, if the ST elevation II is equal to III (as seen in this patient) or less frequently greater than the ST elevation in III, the culprit artery is a non-dominant circumflex artery.
“According to the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2012), the following are the cut off values for ST segment elevation in acute myocardial ischaemia
2 New ST segment elevation at the J point in 2 contiguous leads with the following cut off values: – ≥ 0.1 mV (1 mm) in all leads other than leads V2–V3 where the following cut off values apply: Men < 40 yrs– ≥ 0.25 mV (2.5 mm); Men ≥ 40 years – ≥ 0.20 mV (2.0 mm). Women – ≥ 0.15 mV (1.5 mm)”.1The criteria for the diagnosis of right ventricular infarction is > 0.5 mm ST elevation in right-sided chest leads, especially in lead V4R but also in leads V5R and V6R (except in men who are < 30 years old where the cut off value is > 1 mm).“Hyperacute phase” of anterior STEMI in a 51-year-old man. Note: (1) Markedly elevated ST segments (concave upwards) in V2 to V6, l and aVL ( arrowheads in V2, V3 and aVL) merging with tall T waves in V2 to V4 (ST segment elevation and T wave in V2 = 10 mm and 20 mm respectively). (2) Reciprocal ST segment depression in II, III and AVF (arrowhead in III). Intravenous streptokinase therapy was given. Subsequent coronary angiography revealed a 90% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. (Reproduced with permission. Poh KK, HC Tan, Teo SG. ECG ST segment elevation in patients with chest pain. Sing Med J
2011; 5(1): 3 [with adaptation]).Reciprocal ST segment depression, which is an electrical phenomenon that is not evidence of additional myocardial ischaemia, is predominantly seen in the limb leads in STEMI. In inferior STEMI due to right coronary artery occlusion, ST elevation is nearly always seen in leads II, III and aVF. This results in obligatory reciprocal ST depression in leads I and aVL (Fig
). In anterior STEMI, ST elevation is seen in leads V1/V2 to V5/V6 and frequently also in leads I and aVL. It is the ST elevation in leads I and aVL that causes obligatory reciprocal ST depression in leads II, III and aVF (Fig
).In posterior STEMI, ST elevation is seen in the posterior leads in V7, V8 and V9 (which are uncommonly performed in clinical practice), and reciprocal ST depression is seen in leads V1 to V3
(Fig
).In some patients with a typical history of acute myocardial infarction, the initial ECG may show non-specific changes or even be normal. In such situations, repeat ECG recordings every 15-30 minutes is recommended.In Prinzmetal’s angina, which is due to coronary vasospasm, chest pain usually occurs spontaneously in the early hours of the morning and ST elevation is seen, closely simulating STEMI. However unlike STEMI, in this condition, the ECG quicky becomes normal when the chest pain subsides when sublingual glyceryl trinitrate is given. Table
shows the many causes of ST elevation, all of which can mimic STEMI.
Table 1.
Causes of ST Segment Elevation
ECG showing (i) ST elevation in II, III (arrows in both) and aVF and reciprocal ST depression in I and aVL (arrow in aVL) indicating inferior STEMI (ii) ST depression in V2 (arrow) and V3 indicating posterior STEMI. In patients presenting with inferior STEMI, if the ST elevation in III is greater than that in II (as is see in this ECG), the culprit artery is most likely the right coronary artery (Reference 3) and less frequently a dominant circumflex artery. However, the presence of right ventricular infarction in this patient as indicated by ST elevation in V4R (arrow), V5R and V6R confirms that the culprit artery is the right coronary artery (proximal segment).ECG showing inferior STEMI indicated by ST elevation in II, III (arrows in both) and aVF and posterior STEMI (indicated by ST elevation in V7, V8 (arrow) and V9 and ST depression in V1-V2 [arrows]). The ST segment in I (arrow) is isoelectric.In inferior STEMI, if the ST elevation II is equal to III (as seen in this patient) or less frequently greater than the ST elevation in III, the culprit artery is a non-dominant circumflex artery.
Normal male pattern
In a study by Surawicz and Parikh, 91% of 529 normal males between the age of 17-24 years showed ≥ 1mm ST elevation in 1 or more of the leads V1 to V4. This prevalence however decreased to 14% in men who were 76 years and older. This very high prevalence of ST elevation in young normal males has been termed “normal male pattern”
4,5
(Fig.
). In contrast, the prevalence of this similar ST elevation in females was much lower (about 20% or less) and remained constant throughout the different age groups.
Fig. 5
12-lead ECG in a normal young man. Note ST elevation in V2 to V4 (arrows) reflecting the normal male pattern. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
12-lead ECG in a normal young man. Note ST elevation in V2 to V4 (arrows) reflecting the normal male pattern. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Early repolarization pattern
“The Early Repolarization Pattern has been recognized for the past few decades. The J point is elevated ≥ 1 mm in ≥ 2 contiguous leads in leads V4 to V6. Less commonly, this pattern can also been seen in the limb leads. At the elevated J point, there is frequently either a notch or a slurr, followed by a concave elevation of the ST segment which slopes upwards, merging with a tall T wave. In addition, the left praecordial R waves are also usually tall (Fig.
). This pattern is seen in about 5% of the general population and for decades, it has been regarded as totally benign. However, in the past few years, there has been a controversy whether some patients with this pattern carry a very small risk of ventricular fibrillation. Most likely, the reported cases of Early Repolarization Pattern and ventricular fibrillation belong to a different entity. This is because many of these patients do not show ST elevation, but instead exhibit a horizontal or downsloping ST segment.”1
Fig. 6
Early Repolarization Pattern. Note: (1) ST segments which are elevated ≥ 1 mm concave upwards in V2-V6 (vertical arrows in V4-V6) merging with tall T waves. The T wave in V4 (oblique arrow) is 21 mm. In the enlarged images of V5 and V6, the oblique arrows indicate a notch in V5 and a slurr in V6. (2) The R waves in V4 to V6 are prominent and the amplitudes are increased. R in V5 = 35 mm. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Early Repolarization Pattern. Note: (1) ST segments which are elevated ≥ 1 mm concave upwards in V2-V6 (vertical arrows in V4-V6) merging with tall T waves. The T wave in V4 (oblique arrow) is 21 mm. In the enlarged images of V5 and V6, the oblique arrows indicate a notch in V5 and a slurr in V6. (2) The R waves in V4 to V6 are prominent and the amplitudes are increased. R in V5 = 35 mm. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Acute pericarditis
Figure
shows the classical ECG findings in acute pericarditis
Fig. 7
Acute pericarditis. Note: (1) Elevated ST segments (concave upwards) in V2 to V6, II, III and aVF (arrowheads). The ST segment elevation in the limb leads is maximal in II resulting in reciprocal ST segment depression in aVR (arrow). Depressed PR segment in II (arrow). Normal QRS and T wave voltages. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Acute pericarditis. Note: (1) Elevated ST segments (concave upwards) in V2 to V6, II, III and aVF (arrowheads). The ST segment elevation in the limb leads is maximal in II resulting in reciprocal ST segment depression in aVR (arrow). Depressed PR segment in II (arrow). Normal QRS and T wave voltages. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Left ventricular hypertrophy
Left ventricular hypertrophy is well known to cause ST elevation in leads V1–V3. The deeper the S wave, the higher the ST elevation.Left ventricular hypertrophy and Early Repolarization Pattern are 2 of the most common causes of non-ischaemic ST elevation which may be misdiagnosed as STEMI.Left ventricular hypertrophy with strain pattern in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Note 3 mm ST elevation in V1 and V2 (arrowheads). Figure reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing. [with adaptation].
Brugada syndrome
Fig.
shows the findings of Type 1 Brugada pattern. Patients having this ECG pattern, who in addition present with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are diagnosed to have the “Brugada syndrome”.
Fig. 9
Type 1 Brugada pattern. In this ECG, the J point is elevated ≥ 2 mm in V1 and V2. The elevated ST segment is coved shape (arrows in V1 and V2) and downsloping, terminating in an inverted T wave. To qualify for the diagnosis of Type 1 Brugada pattern, the above ECG pattern must be seen in either V1 or V2 or in both these leads as is seen in this patient. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Type 1 Brugada pattern. In this ECG, the J point is elevated ≥ 2 mm in V1 and V2. The elevated ST segment is coved shape (arrows in V1 and V2) and downsloping, terminating in an inverted T wave. To qualify for the diagnosis of Type 1 Brugada pattern, the above ECG pattern must be seen in either V1 or V2 or in both these leads as is seen in this patient. (Reproduced from Clinical Cardiology 4th Edition by BL Chia, World Scientific Publishing).
Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy
In this condition, either ST elevation (Fig.
) or deep T wave inversion, simulating closely STEMI or non-STEMI respectively, is seen in the acute phase.
Fig. 10
ECG of a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy showing convex upwards ST elevation (arrows in V2 and V3) together with biphasic T wave inversion in V2-V4. This ECG closely simulates anterior STEMI.
ECG of a patient with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy showing convex upwards ST elevation (arrows in V2 and V3) together with biphasic T wave inversion in V2-V4. This ECG closely simulates anterior STEMI.
Conclusion
ST segment elevation is an extremely important finding in modern day electrocardiography. It has many causes, of which the most important is ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although there are many pitfalls in the ECG evaluation of STEMI, with our current ECG knowledge and expertise coupled with clinical correlation as well as the present availability of cardiac biomarkers, echocardiography, computed tomography and percutaneous coronary angiography, accurate diagnosis today can be achieved in the majority of cases.
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Hugo A Katus; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690