| Literature DB >> 27795713 |
Paula Müller1, Natalia Voronina1, Frauke Hausburg1, Cornelia A Lux1, Frank Wiekhorst2, Gustav Steinhoff1, Robert David1.
Abstract
Aim.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27795713 PMCID: PMC5067480 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7152761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1Schematic structure of superparamagnetic transfection complexes. Complexes are composed of a streptavidin-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (MNP) and biotinylated polyethylenimine (PEI), which condenses miR through electrostatic interactions.
Figure 8Uptake efficiency, viability, and surface marker pattern after transfection in supportive cytokine-supplemented culture medium. Cells were transfected with optimized miR/PEI (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5) and miR/PEI/MNP (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5; 3 and 5 μg/mL MNPs) complexes and cultured in StemSpan H3000 supplemented with StemSpan CC100. Uptake efficiency (a) was measured 18 h after transfection by flow cytometry and viability (b) and expression of CD45, CD34, and CD133+ (c) were measured 18 h and 24 h after transfection by flow cytometry. Untransfected cells were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 2.
Figure 2Optimization of CD133+ transfection with different compositions of miR/PEI complexes. Cells were transfected with Cy3-labeled complexes consisting of four different miR amounts (10, 20, 30, and 40 pmol) and three different N/P ratios (2.5, 5, and 7.5). Uptake efficiency (a) and cytotoxicity (b) were measured 18 h after transfection by flow cytometry. Untransfected cells were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 4; statistic was performed versus 10 pmol miR with respective N/P ratio (a) and versus control (b); p ≤ 0.05; p ≤ 0.01; p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3Optimization of CD133+ transfection using different compositions of miR/PEI/MNP complexes. Cells were transfected with Cy3-labeled complexes consisting of 20 pmol miR, three different N/P ratios (2.5, 5, and 7.5), and six different MNP amounts (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL). Representative images confirming intracellular localisation of complexes were taken 18 h after transfection using laser scanning confocal microscopy (a). Uptake efficiency (b) and cytotoxicity (c) were measured 18 h after transfection by flow cytometry. Untransfected cells were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 4; statistic was performed versus 20 pmol miR, N/P ratio 2.5 with respective MNP amount (indicated as ∗) or within the same N/P ratio (a) and versus control (b); p ≤ 0.05; p ≤ 0.01; p ≤ 0.001. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 4Magnetic targeting of modified CD133+ cells. Cells were transfected with Cy3-labeled complexes consisting of 20 pmol miR, two different N/P ratios (5 and 7.5), and MNP amounts (3 and 5 μg/mL). 18 h after transfection, a local magnetic field was applied for 24 h. Pictures were taken from areas with and without magnet (a). Cell numbers in both areas were counted (c) and magnetic targeting ratios were calculated (b). Untransfected cells were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3; statistic was performed versus control (indicated as ∗) or within respective MNP amounts (indicated as #); p ≤ 0.05; p ≤ 0.01; p ≤ 0.001. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 5Intracellular visualization of transfection complexes. Cells were transfected with optimized fluorescently labeled miR/PEI/MNP (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5; 3 μg/mL MNPs) complexes. miR staining was performed with Cy5 dye (red). PEI was labeled Oregon Green 488 (green). MNPs were stained with Atto 565 (yellow). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Representative images were taken 18 h after transfection using structured illumination microscopy (SIM). Scale bar = 5 μm.
Figure 6Viability and surface marker pattern after transfection. Cells were transfected with optimized miR/PEI (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5) and miR/PEI/MNP (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5; 3 and 5 μg/mL MNPs) complexes. Viability (a) and expression of CD45, CD34, and CD133 (b) were measured 18 h after transfection by flow cytometry. Untransfected cells (0 h and 18 h) were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3; statistic was performed versus 0 h control (indicated as ∗) or versus 18 h control; p ≤ 0.05; p ≤ 0.01; p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 7Haematopoietic differentiation capacity of cells after transfection. Cells were transfected with optimized miR/PEI (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5) and miR/PEI/MNP (20 pmol miR; N/P ratio 7.5; 3 and 5 μg/mL MNPs) complexes and colony-forming unit (CFU) assays were performed. After incubation for 14 d, CFU-erythroid (CFU-E) (a), Burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) (b), CFU-granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, and megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM) (c), and CFU-granulocyte and macrophage (CFU-GM) (d) were counted (e). Presented pictures are illustrating observed cell morphologies. Untransfected cells were used as control. Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3; statistic was performed within respective units; p ≤ 0.05; p ≤ 0.01; p ≤ 0.001. Scale bar = 200 μm.