Literature DB >> 27795372

Escherichia coli Probiotic Strain ED1a in Pigs Has a Limited Impact on the Gut Carriage of Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing E. coli.

G Mourand1,2, F Paboeuf1,2, M A Fleury1,2, E Jouy1,2, S Bougeard1,2, E Denamur3,4,5, I Kempf6,2.   

Abstract

Four trials were conducted to evaluate the impact of Escherichia coli probiotic strain ED1a administration to pigs on the gut carriage or survival in manure of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing E. coli Groups of pigs were orally inoculated with strain E. coli M63 carrying the blaCTX-M-1 gene (n = 84) or used as a control (n = 26). In the first two trials, 24 of 40 E. coli M63-inoculated pigs were given E. coli ED1a orally for 6 days starting 8 days after oral inoculation. In the third trial, 10 E. coli M63-inoculated pigs were given either E. coli ED1a or probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 for 5 days. In the fourth trial, E. coli ED1a was given to a sow and its 12 piglets, and these 12 piglets plus 12 piglets that had not received E. coli ED1a were then inoculated with E. coli M63. Fecal shedding of cefotaxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CTX-RE) was studied by culture, and blaCTX-M-1 genes were quantified by PCR. The persistence of CTX-RE in manure samples from inoculated pigs or manure samples inoculated in vitro with E. coli M63 with or without probiotics was studied. The results showed that E. coli M63 and ED1a were good gut colonizers. The reduction in the level of fecal excretion of CTX-RE in E. coli ED1a-treated pigs compared to that in nontreated pigs was usually less than 1 log10 CFU and was mainly observed during the probiotic administration period. The results obtained with E. coli Nissle 1917 did not differ significantly from those obtained with E. coli ED1a. CTX-RE survival did not differ significantly in manure samples with or without probiotic treatment. In conclusion, under our experimental conditions, E. coli ED1a and E. coli Nissle 1917 could not durably prevent CTX-RE colonization of the pig gut.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic resistance; cephalosporin; cephalosporin resistance; microbiota; pig; probiotic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27795372      PMCID: PMC5192156          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01293-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum (beta)-lactamases.

Authors:  Neil Woodford; Elizabeth J Fagan; Matthew J Ellington
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet.

Authors:  Efrain M Ribot; M A Fair; R Gautom; D N Cameron; S B Hunter; B Swaminathan; Timothy J Barrett
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Effect of a commercial competitive exclusion culture on reduction of colonization of an antibiotic-resistant pathogenic Escherichia coli in day-old broiler chickens.

Authors:  Charles L Hofacre; Alison C Johnson; Barry J Kelly; Robrecht Froyman
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  Transmission of IncN plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-1 between commensal Escherichia coli in pigs and farm workers.

Authors:  Arshnee Moodley; Luca Guardabassi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Probiotic treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen J Manley; Margaret B Fraenkel; Barrie C Mayall; David A Power
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 for probiotic use in piglets: evidence for intestinal colonization.

Authors:  S Barth; S Duncker; J Hempe; G Breves; G Baljer; R Bauerfeind
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Evidence for a human-specific Escherichia coli clone.

Authors:  Olivier Clermont; Mathilde Lescat; Claire L O'Brien; David M Gordon; Olivier Tenaillon; Erick Denamur
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples.

Authors:  Zhongtang Yu; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Selection and persistence of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli in the intestinal flora of pigs treated with amoxicillin, ceftiofur, or cefquinome.

Authors:  L M Cavaco; E Abatih; F M Aarestrup; L Guardabassi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Furet; Olivier Firmesse; Michèle Gourmelon; Chantal Bridonneau; Julien Tap; Stanislas Mondot; Joël Doré; Gérard Corthier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.194

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interplay between Bacterial Clones and Plasmids in the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the Gut: Lessons from a Temporal Study in Veal Calves.

Authors:  Méril Massot; Pierre Châtre; Bénédicte Condamine; Véronique Métayer; Olivier Clermont; Jean-Yves Madec; Erick Denamur; Marisa Haenni
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Bacteriophage Cocktail and Microcin-Producing Probiotic Escherichia coli Protect Mice Against Gut Colonization With Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131.

Authors:  Stephen B Porter; Brian D Johnston; Dagmara Kisiela; Connie Clabots; Evgeni V Sokurenko; James R Johnson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.