Literature DB >> 27794510

En Bloc Resections in the Spine: The Experience of 220 Patients During 25 Years.

Stefano Boriani1, Alessandro Gasbarrini1, Stefano Bandiera1, Riccardo Ghermandi1, Ran Lador2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: En bloc resections aim at surgically removing a tumor in a single, intact piece. Approach must be planned for the complete removal of the tumor without violation of its margins. The shared knowledge of the morbidity, mortality, risk assessment for local disease recurrence, complications, and death, related to spine tumors excised en bloc could improve the treating physician's apprehension of the diseases and decision making process before, during, and after surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to review and report the experience gained during 25 years in one of the world's biggest spine oncologic centers.
METHODS: A retrospective study of prospective collected data of 1681 patients affected by spine tumors, of whom 220 had en bloc resections performed.
RESULTS: Most tumors were primary-165 cases (43 benign and 122 malignant); metastases occurred in 55 patients. A total of 60 patients died from the disease and 33 local recurrences were recorded. A total of 153 complications were observed in 100 of 216 patients (46.2%); 64 of these patients (30%) suffered 1 complication, whereas the rest had 2 or more. All complications were categorized according to temporal distribution and severity. These were further divided into 7 groups according to the type of complication. There were 105 major and 48 minor complications. Seven patients (4.6%) died as a result of complications. There were 33 local recurrences (15.28%) recorded. Contaminated cases, surgical margins of the resected tumor-intralesional, marginal, and malignant tumors-were statistically significant independent risk factors for local recurrence of the tumor. Contamination, local recurrence, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, number of levels resected, and metastatic tumors compared with primary malignant tumor were shown to be independent risk factors for a patient's death.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of spinal aggressive benign and malignant bone tumors with en bloc resection is beneficial in terms of better local control and prognosis, although it is a highly demanding and risky procedure. Margins are the key point of this procedure, thus a careful preoperative oncologic and surgical staging is necessary to define the optimal surgical approach. The adverse event profile of these surgeries is high. Therefore, it should be performed by experienced and multidisciplinary teams in specialized high volume centers.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  En bloc resection; Morbidity; Spine tumors; Surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794510     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical effectiveness of Enneking appropriate versus Enneking inappropriate procedure in patients with primary osteosarcoma of the spine: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Pombo; Ana Cristina Ferreira; Pedro Cardoso; António Oliveira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Total en bloc spondylectomy.

Authors:  Morgan Jones; James Holton; Simon Hughes; Marcin Czyz
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

3.  A novel muscle-sparing high thoracotomy for upper thoracic spine resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Derek T Bernstein; Wu Zhuge; Shanda H Blackmon; Rex A W Marco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK fixation system in the treatment of spine tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Stefano Boriani; Giuseppe Tedesco; Lu Ming; Riccardo Ghermandi; Maurizio Amichetti; Piero Fossati; Marco Krengli; Loredana Mavilla; Alessandro Gasbarrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up.

Authors:  Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Peter C Gerszten; Sten Myrehaug; Nina A Mayr; William Tc Yuh; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Arjun Sahgal; Simon S Lo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Percutaneous Interventional Management of Spinal Metastasis.

Authors:  Seon-Kyu Lee; Brandon Weiss; Vijay Yanamadala; Allan Brook
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Intralesional Marginal Resection for Osteoblastoma in the Mobile Spine: Experience From a Single Center.

Authors:  Shiliang Cao; Keyuan Chen; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Xiaoguang Liu; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Hybrid Therapy (Surgery and Radiosurgery) for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Jacob L Goldberg; Joseph A Carnevale; Samuel Z Hanz; Anne S Reiner; Adam Schmitt; Daniel S Higginson; Yoshiya Yamada; Ilya Laufer; Mark H Bilsky; Ori Barzilai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Surgical Approach to Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Siegel; J Sybil Biermann; Anda-Alexandra Calinescu; Daniel E Spratt; Nicholas J Szerlip
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  Surgical Metastasectomy in the Spine: A Review Article.

Authors:  Satoshi Kato; Satoru Demura; Kazuya Shinmura; Noriaki Yokogawa; Takaki Shimizu; Hideki Murakami; Norio Kawahara; Katsuro Tomita; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.