Literature DB >> 27794400

Pre- and postoperative care for stage I-III NSCLC: Which quality of care indicators are evidence-based?

Rachel C Numan1, Martijn Ten Berge2, Jacobus A Burgers3, Houke M Klomp4, Johanna W van Sandick4, Paul Baas3, Michel W Wouters4.   

Abstract

Identification of evidenced-based Quality of Care (QoC) indicators for lung cancer care is essential to quality improvement. The aim of this review was to identify evidence-based quality indicators for the pre- and postoperative care of stage I-III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provided by the lung physician. To obtain these indicators, a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library database was performed. English literature published between 1980 and 2012 was included and search terms regarding 'lung neoplasms', 'quality of care', 'pathology', 'diagnostic methods', 'preoperative and postoperative treatment' were used. The potential indicators were categorized as structure, process or outcome measures and the indicators supported by literature with high evidence level were selected. Five QoC indicators were identified. The use of the positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) results in more accurate mediastinal staging compared to the CT scan. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration and Endobronchial Ultrasound-Fine Needle Aspiration are sensitive diagnostic tools for mediastinal staging and reduce futile thoracotomies. Pathological conformation of lung cancer can best be obtained by a combination of cytological and histological diagnostics used during bronchoscopy. For patients with clinical stage III NSCLC, preoperative multimodality treatment (i.e. preoperative chemoradiation) results in superior survival and increased mediastinal downstaging compared to single modality treatment (i.e. preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy). After surgery, the addition of chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit for patients with pathological stage II and III NSCLC. These five QoC indicators can be used for benchmarking and ultimately quality improvement of lung cancer care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Quality indicator; Quality of Care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794400     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  3 in total

Review 1.  Oncologic Quality Indicators in Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Jessica Hudson; Tara Semenkovich; Varun Puri
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  [Surgical Quality Surveillance and Sustaining Improvement of Lung Cancer Surgery Based on Standard Operation Procedure (SOP): Experience of Single Surgical Team].

Authors:  Xing Wang; Shi Yan; Yaqi Wang; Nan Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  'Care for Outcomes': systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Cramer-van der Welle; Lotte van Loenhout; Ben Eem van den Borne; Franz Mnh Schramel; Lea M Dijksman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.