RATIONALE: In quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers and therapeutic proteins by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), it is a preferred and well-established approach to digest with proteolytic enzymes to produce smaller peptide fragments which are more suitable for LC/MS analysis than the intact protein. In-solution digestion is one widely used method for protein digestion. Proteolytically resistant proteins often require digestion times that extend beyond normal working hours and prohibit same day analysis. We evaluated the performance of an immobilized enzyme reactor (IMER) to determine if this technology could reduce method development time, digestion time and increase throughput. METHODS: We digested human plasma samples using a commercially available IMER, Flash Digest, and compared it to an in-solution digestion method for analysis of three different apolipoprotein biomarkers APOE, APOC2, and APOC3. The plasma digests were analyzed via LC/MS using electrospray ionization (ESI) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Value assigned calibrators were selected over a relevant physiological concentration range for each protein of interest. Quality control samples (QCs) and 'unknown' human plasma samples were analyzed with both methods. RESULTS: Flash Digest significantly reduced digestion time for APOC3, the most proteolytically resistant of the three proteins, to 30 min compared with overnight used with in-solution digestion. The Flash Digest achieved comparable digestion efficiency with minimal method development and reduced sample preparation time. Both methods showed linearity over a physiologically relevant concentration range. Precision was evaluated and a percentage coefficient of variance (% CV) less than 8% was obtained during intra-day reproducibility evaluation for all three apolipoproteins with Flash Digest. Concentrations observed for QCs and unknown samples using Flash Digest were comparable to the in-solution method. CONCLUSIONS: An IMER such as Flash Digest may be a potential alternative to in-solution digestion to accelerate digestion of proteolytically resistant proteins in a quantitative proteomics experiments, reduce method development time and increase throughput.
RATIONALE: In quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers and therapeutic proteins by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), it is a preferred and well-established approach to digest with proteolytic enzymes to produce smaller peptide fragments which are more suitable for LC/MS analysis than the intact protein. In-solution digestion is one widely used method for protein digestion. Proteolytically resistant proteins often require digestion times that extend beyond normal working hours and prohibit same day analysis. We evaluated the performance of an immobilized enzyme reactor (IMER) to determine if this technology could reduce method development time, digestion time and increase throughput. METHODS: We digested human plasma samples using a commercially available IMER, Flash Digest, and compared it to an in-solution digestion method for analysis of three different apolipoprotein biomarkers APOE, APOC2, and APOC3. The plasma digests were analyzed via LC/MS using electrospray ionization (ESI) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Value assigned calibrators were selected over a relevant physiological concentration range for each protein of interest. Quality control samples (QCs) and 'unknown' human plasma samples were analyzed with both methods. RESULTS: Flash Digest significantly reduced digestion time for APOC3, the most proteolytically resistant of the three proteins, to 30 min compared with overnight used with in-solution digestion. The Flash Digest achieved comparable digestion efficiency with minimal method development and reduced sample preparation time. Both methods showed linearity over a physiologically relevant concentration range. Precision was evaluated and a percentage coefficient of variance (% CV) less than 8% was obtained during intra-day reproducibility evaluation for all three apolipoproteins with Flash Digest. Concentrations observed for QCs and unknown samples using Flash Digest were comparable to the in-solution method. CONCLUSIONS: An IMER such as Flash Digest may be a potential alternative to in-solution digestion to accelerate digestion of proteolytically resistant proteins in a quantitative proteomics experiments, reduce method development time and increase throughput.
Authors: Tereza Šlechtová; Martin Gilar; Květa Kalíková; Stephanie M Moore; James W Jorgenson; Eva Tesařová Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: John S Millar; Michael E Lassman; Tiffany Thomas; Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan; Patricia Jumes; Richard L Dunbar; Emil M deGoma; Amanda L Baer; Wahida Karmally; Daniel S Donovan; Hashmi Rafeek; John A Wagner; Stephen Holleran; Joseph Obunike; Yang Liu; Soumia Aoujil; Taylor Standiford; David E Gutstein; Henry N Ginsberg; Daniel J Rader; Gissette Reyes-Soffer Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Silvia Millán-Martín; Craig Jakes; Sara Carillo; Tom Buchanan; Marc Guender; Dan Bach Kristensen; Trine Meiborg Sloth; Martin Ørgaard; Ken Cook; Jonathan Bones Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 4.142