Literature DB >> 27793476

Predicting Competing Mortality in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy Aged 70 yr or Older.

Michael Froehner1, Rainer Koch2, Matthias Hübler3, Stefan Zastrow4, Manfred P Wirth4.   

Abstract

Estimating the risk of competing mortality is of importance in tailoring optimal individual management strategies in patients with early prostate cancer. Using proportional hazard models for competing risks, we determined which parameters predict competing mortality in patients selected for radical prostatectomy aged 70 yr or older and compared the prognostic impact of individual parameters with that of their younger counterparts. Three common diseases (diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, and other cancer) that predicted competing mortality in younger men were not predictors of competing mortality in men selected for radical prostatectomy aged 70 yr or older (hazard ratio [HR]:<1). Besides age (HR/yr: 1.08, p=0.0255), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 2.33, p=0.0195), cerebrovascular disease (HR: 2.23, p=0.0242), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 3 (HR: 2.19, p<0.0001), current smoking (HR: 2.18, p=0.0098), and lower or unknown level of education (HR: 2.07, p=0.0002) were independent predictors of competing mortality in patients aged 70 yr or older. Combining these five conditions in a score might provide a superior comorbidity measure in this particular population. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Stricter selection may diminish the prognostic significance of several common diseases in men selected for radical prostatectomy aged 70 yr or older whereas other parameters (peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 3, current smoking, and level of education) sustained their meaningfulness and should be taken into consideration when the risk of competing mortality is estimated.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Comorbidity; Competing risk analysis; Mortality; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Selection; Urologic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27793476     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

1.  [Localised prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy or deferred treatment strategy].

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Mortality prediction following non-traumatic amputation of the lower extremity.

Authors:  D C Norvell; M L Thompson; E J Boyko; G Landry; A J Littman; W G Henderson; A P Turner; C Maynard; K P Moore; J M Czerniecki
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Evaluation of comorbidity indices in determining the most suitable candidates for uro-oncological surgeries in elderly men.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Ali Ihsan Arik; Numan Baydilli; Mehmet Sinan Basay; Halil Basar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-03-05

4.  Effects of age and comorbidity on survival vary according to risk grouping among patients with prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy: A retrospective competing-risk analysis from the K-CaP registry.

Authors:  Yoon Soo Hah; Kwang Suk Lee; In Young Choi; Ji Youl Lee; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Seung Hwan Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Byung Ha Chung; Kyo Chul Koo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.