Lucyna Kępka1, Dobromira Tyc-Szczepaniak2, Krzysztof Bujko2, Marta Olszyna-Serementa2, Wojciech Michalski2, Arkadiusz Sprawka3, Berenika Trąbska-Kluch4, Katarzyna Komosińska5, Ewa Wasilewska-Teśluk5, Beata Czeremszyńska5. 1. Independent Public Health Care Facility of the Ministry of the Interior and Warmian & Mazurian Oncology Centre, Olsztyn, Poland. Electronic address: lucynak@coi.pl. 2. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Oncology Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. 3. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Oncology Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; Centre of Oncological Diagnostics and Therapy, Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Poland. 4. Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland. 5. Independent Public Health Care Facility of the Ministry of the Interior and Warmian & Mazurian Oncology Centre, Olsztyn, Poland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate if neurological/cognitive function outcomes in patients with resected single brain metastasis (BM) after stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) are not inferior compared to those achieved with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS:Patients with total/subtotal resection of single BM were randomly assigned either to SRT-TB (n=29) or WBRT (n=30). SRT-TB arm consisted of 15Gy/1 fraction, or 5×5Gy. WBRT consisted of 30Gy/10 fractions. Neurological/cognitive failure was defined as a decrease of neurological score by one point or more, or a worsening of the MiniMental test by at least 3 points, or neurological death. Cumulative incidence of neurological/cognitive failure (CINCF), neurological death (CIND), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29months (range: 8-45) for 15 patients still alive. The difference in the probability of CINCF at 6months (primary endpoint) was -8% in favor of WBRT (95% confidence interval: +17% -35%; non-inferiority margin: -20%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, two-year CIND rates were 66% vs. 31%, for SRT-TB and WBRT arm, respectively, p=.015. The corresponding figures for OS were 10% vs. 37%, p=.046. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of SRT-TB was not demonstrated in our underpowered study. More data from randomized studies are needed for confirmation of the value of this method. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate if neurological/cognitive function outcomes in patients with resected single brain metastasis (BM) after stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) are not inferior compared to those achieved with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS:Patients with total/subtotal resection of single BM were randomly assigned either to SRT-TB (n=29) or WBRT (n=30). SRT-TB arm consisted of 15Gy/1 fraction, or 5×5Gy. WBRT consisted of 30Gy/10 fractions. Neurological/cognitive failure was defined as a decrease of neurological score by one point or more, or a worsening of the MiniMental test by at least 3 points, or neurological death. Cumulative incidence of neurological/cognitive failure (CINCF), neurological death (CIND), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29months (range: 8-45) for 15 patients still alive. The difference in the probability of CINCF at 6months (primary endpoint) was -8% in favor of WBRT (95% confidence interval: +17% -35%; non-inferiority margin: -20%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, two-year CIND rates were 66% vs. 31%, for SRT-TB and WBRT arm, respectively, p=.015. The corresponding figures for OS were 10% vs. 37%, p=.046. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of SRT-TB was not demonstrated in our underpowered study. More data from randomized studies are needed for confirmation of the value of this method. Copyright Â
Authors: L Kepka; D Tyc-Szczepaniak; K Osowiecka; A Sprawka; B Trąbska-Kluch; B Czeremszynska Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Chiara Reverberi; Stefania Volpe; Stefano M Magrini; Stefano Arcangeli; Damiano Balestrini; Michela Buglione; Piera Navarria; Silvia Scoccianti; Pierpaolo Panciani; Marco Krengli; Luigi Pirtoli; Lorenzo Bordi; Giovanni L Pappagallo; Rolando M D ' Angelillo Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Nayan Lamba; Rachel Brigell Kearney; Paul J Catalano; Michael J Hassett; Patrick Y Wen; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Ayal A Aizer Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Paul D Brown; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Osaama H Khan; Anthony L Asher; Jeffrey S Wefel; Vinai Gondi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy K Nguyen; Arjun Sahgal; Jay Detsky; Eshetu G Atenafu; Sten Myrehaug; Chia-Lin Tseng; Zain Husain; Chris Heyn; Pejman Maralani; Mark Ruschin; James Perry; Hany Soliman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Paul D Brown; Karla V Ballman; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Anthony C Whitton; Jeffrey Greenspoon; Ian F Parney; Nadia N I Laack; Jonathan B Ashman; Jean-Paul Bahary; Costas G Hadjipanayis; James J Urbanic; Fred G Barker; Elana Farace; Deepak Khuntia; Caterina Giannini; Jan C Buckner; Evanthia Galanis; David Roberge Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Natalie A Lockney; Diana G Wang; Philip H Gutin; Cameron Brennan; Viviane Tabar; Ase Ballangrud; Xin Pei; Timothy A Chan; Yoshiya Yamada; T Jonathan Yang; Kathryn Beal Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 6.280