| Literature DB >> 27793038 |
Meng-Chen Tsai1, Wei-Ming Li2,3,4,5, Chun-Nung Huang3,4, Hung-Lung Ke3,4, Ching-Chia Li3,4,6, Hsin-Chih Yeh3,4,6, Ti-Chun Chan1, Peir-In Liang7, Bi-Wen Yeh3,4, Wen-Jeng Wu2,3,4,6,8,9,10, Sher-Wei Lim11,12,13, Chien-Feng Li1,14,15,16,17.
Abstract
The migration ability of urothelial carcinoma corresponding to dismal prognosis had not been fully investigated. The interaction of extracellular collagen with a unique transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase, Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2), was selected by data mining. We arranged real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays to evaluate the transcript levels in 26 urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and 26 urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma specimens, showing significantly increase corresponding to advanced primary stage (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). An immunohistochemistry analysis and H-score calculation were performed to determine DDR2 expression in 340 urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and 295 urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. Assessments of the correlation to clinicopathologic features, disease-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival were conducted. The transcript levels in advanced stage were higher than those in early stage and were correlated with poor prognosis. The higher expression was positively correlated to higher pT status (p < 0.001), higher histological grade (urinary tract, p = 0.041; urinary bladder, p < 0.001), greater vascular invasion (p < 0.001), and higher mitotic rate (urinary tract, p = 0.039; urinary bladder, p < 0.001). Higher expression also indicates significantly worse disease-specific survival and metastasis-free survival. In vitro study revealed knockdown of DDR2 resulted in a depletion of cellular viability, migratory, and invasive ability, supporting the oncogenic function of DDR2.Entities:
Keywords: DDR2; prognosis; transcriptome; urothelial carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27793038 PMCID: PMC5346687 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Gene expression profile analysis in urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma from a published transcriptomic dataset (GSE31684)
Clustering analysis of genes regarding transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity showed DDR2 as the most up-regulated gene with both higher primary tumor status (pT) and distal metastasis. Samples from the high pT (T2 and above, blue lines), low pT (Ta and T1, yellow lines), metastasis (purple lines), and absence of metastasis (orange lines) are shown on top of the heatmap, and the upregulation and downregulation of mRNA transcriptional level are displayed as a spectrum of brightness of red and green, respectively. The unaltered ones are coded black.
Summary of differentially expressed genes associated with transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity (GO:0004714) and showed positive associations to cancer invasiveness and metastasis in the transcriptome of urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (GSE31684)
| Probe | Comparing T2–4 to Ta-T1 | Comparing Meta.to Non-Meta. | Gene Symbol | Biological Process | Molecular Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| log ratio | log ratio | ||||||
| 205168_at | 0.6233 | 0.0077 | 0.5747 | 0.0018 | cell adhesion, positive regulation of cell proliferation, protein amino acid phosphorylation, signal transduction, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | ATP binding, kinase activity, nucleotide binding, protein kinase activity, protein-tyrosine kinase activity, receptor activity, transferase activity, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | |
| 205578_at | 0.6393 | <0.0001 | 0.3795 | 0.0010 | JNK cascade, Wnt receptor signaling pathway; calcium modulating pathway, cartilage condensation, cell differentiation, embryonic genitalia morphogenesis, multicellular organismal development, protein amino acid phosphorylation, signal transduction, skeletal development, somitogenesis | ATP binding, kinase activity, nucleotide binding, protein binding, protein kinase activity, protein-tyrosine kinase activity, receptor activity, transferase activity, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | |
| 225442_at | 0.9193 | 0.0001 | 0.8109 | <0.0001 | cell adhesion, positive regulation of cell proliferation, protein amino acid phosphorylation, signal transduction, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | ATP binding, nucleotide binding, protein-tyrosine kinase activity, receptor activity, transferase activity, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | |
| 227561_at | 0.796 | 0.0011 | 0.7064 | 0.0002 | cell adhesion, positive regulation of cell proliferation, protein amino acid phosphorylation, signal transduction, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | ATP binding, nucleotide binding, protein-tyrosine kinase activity, receptor activity, transferase activity, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | |
| 226213_at | −2.2339 | <0.0001 | −0.8044 | 0.0036 | heart development, peripheral nervous system development, protein amino acid phosphorylation, signal transduction, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | ATP binding, epidermal growth factor receptor activity, kinase activity, nucleotide binding, protein binding, protein heterodimerization activity, protein kinase activity, protein-tyrosine kinase activity, receptor activity, transferase activity, transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | |
Meta., distal metastasis developed during follow-up; Non-Meta.: no metastatic event developed.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier plot generated from GSE31684 reveals the prognostic significance of DDR2 expression level for the overall survival of urothelial carcinoma by comparing 37 cases with high DDR2 expression and 56 with low expression (P = 0.0335)
Figure 3Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis discovers that DDR2 mRNA is significantly overexpressed in urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs, left panel) and urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas (UBUCs, right panel) with higher primary tumor statuses
Correlations between DDR2 expression and other important clinicopathological parameters in urothelial carcinomas
| Parameter | Category | Upper Carcinoma | Urinary | Tract | Urothelial | Urinary | Bladder | Urothelial | Carcinoma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case No. | DDR2 Expression | Case No. | DDR2 Expression | ||||||
| Low | High | Low | High | ||||||
| Gender | Male | 158 | 81 | 77 | 0.664 | 216 | 110 | 106 | 0.667 |
| Female | 182 | 89 | 93 | 79 | 38 | 41 | |||
| Age (years) | < 65 | 138 | 67 | 71 | 0.659 | 121 | 63 | 58 | 0.587 |
| ≥ 65 | 202 | 103 | 99 | 174 | 85 | 89 | |||
| Tumor location | Renal pelvis | 141 | 63 | 78 | 0.250 | − | − | − | − |
| Ureter | 150 | 80 | 70 | − | − | − | − | ||
| Renal pelvis & ureter | 49 | 27 | 22 | − | − | − | − | ||
| Multifocality | Single | 278 | 137 | 141 | 0.574 | − | − | − | − |
| Multifocal | 62 | 33 | 29 | − | − | − | − | ||
| Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 89 | 60 | 29 | 84 | 63 | 21 | ||
| T1 | 92 | 58 | 34 | 88 | 43 | 45 | |||
| T2-T4 | 159 | 52 | 107 | 123 | 42 | 81 | |||
| Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 312 | 161 | 151 | 266 | 136 | 130 | 0.319 | |
| Positive (N1-N2) | 28 | 9 | 19 | 29 | 12 | 17 | |||
| Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 35 | 21 | 56 | 44 | 12 | ||
| High grade | 284 | 135 | 149 | 239 | 104 | 135 | |||
| Pattern of Invasion | Nodular | 200 | 124 | 76 | < 0.001 | 137 | 87 | 50 | < 0.001 |
| Trabecular | 58 | 21 | 37 | 82 | 37 | 45 | |||
| Infiltrative | 82 | 25 | 57 | 76 | 24 | 52 | |||
| Vascular invasion | Absent | 234 | 142 | 92 | 246 | 135 | 111 | ||
| Present | 106 | 28 | 78 | 49 | 13 | 36 | |||
| Perineural invasion | Absent | 321 | 166 | 155 | 275 | 142 | 133 | 0.062 | |
| Present | 19 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 14 | |||
| Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | < 10 | 173 | 96 | 77 | 139 | 92 | 47 | ||
| >= 10 | 167 | 74 | 93 | 156 | 56 | 100 | |||
Statistically significant.
Figure 4Representative lesions for DDR2 immunostaining reveals DDR2 is undetected in normal urothelium
(A1), and urothelial dysplasia (A2), and non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (B). There is an escalated increase of immunoacitvity from superficial invasive (C) to muscle invasive (D) urothelial carcinoma.
Univariate log—rank and multivariate analyses for disease-specific and metastasis-free survivals in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
| Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
| No. of event | R.R. | 95% C.I. | No. of event | R.R. | 95% C.I. | |||||||
| Gender | Male | 158 | 28 | 0.8286 | − | − | − | 32 | 0.7904 | − | − | − |
| Female | 182 | 33 | − | − | − | 38 | − | − | − | |||
| Age (years) | < 65 | 138 | 26 | 0.9943 | − | − | − | 30 | 0.8470 | − | − | − |
| ≥ 65 | 202 | 35 | − | − | − | 40 | − | − | − | |||
| Tumor side | Right | 177 | 34 | 0.7366 | − | − | − | 38 | 0.3074 | − | − | − |
| Left | 154 | 26 | − | − | − | 32 | − | − | − | |||
| Bilateral | 9 | 1 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | |||
| Tumor location | Renal pelvis | 141 | 24 | 1 | − | 0.822 | 31 | 0.0659 | − | − | − | |
| Ureter | 150 | 22 | 0.712 | 0.200–2.538 | 25 | − | − | − | ||||
| Renal pelvis & ureter | 49 | 15 | 0.848 | 0.217–3.308 | 14 | − | − | − | ||||
| Multifocality | Single | 273 | 48 | 1 | − | 52 | 1 | − | ||||
| Multifocal | 62 | 18 | 2.774 | 1.274–6.039 | 18 | 2.569 | ||||||
| Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 89 | 2 | 1 | − | 4 | 1 | − | 0.260 | |||
| T1 | 92 | 9 | 3.919 | 0.832–18.450 | 15 | 3.314 | 1.072–10.248 | |||||
| T2-T4 | 159 | 50 | 5.163 | 1.137–23.439 | 51 | 2.729 | 0.969–8.580 | |||||
| Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 312 | 42 | 1 | − | 55 | 1 | − | ||||
| Positive (N1–N2) | 28 | 19 | 5.178 | 2.837–9.450 | 15 | 2.877 | ||||||
| Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 4 | 1 | − | 3 | 1 | − | ||||
| High grade | 284 | 57 | 2.964 | 1.030–8.534 | 67 | 3.926 | ||||||
| Vascular invasion | Absent | 234 | 24 | 1 | − | 26 | 1 | − | ||||
| Present | 106 | 37 | 1.504 | 0.833–2.717 | 44 | 2.237 | ||||||
| Perineural invasion | Absent | 321 | 50 | 1 | − | < 0.001 | 61 | 1 | − | |||
| Present | 19 | 11 | 3.773 | 1.804–7.894 | 9 | 2.749 | ||||||
| Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | < 10 | 173 | 27 | 0.167 | − | − | 30 | − | − | |||
| >= 10 | 167 | 34 | − | − | 40 | − | − | |||||
| DDR2 expression | Low | 170 | 13 | 1 | − | 15 | 1 | − | ||||
| High | 170 | 48 | 2.637 | 1.404–4.949 | 55 | 2.797 | ||||||
Statistically significant
Univariate log-rank and multivariate analyses for disease-specific and metastasis-free survivals in urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma
| Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||||||
| No. of event | R.R. | 95% C.I. | No. of event | R.R. | 95% C.I. | |||||||||||
| Gender | Male | 216 | 41 | 0.4446 | − | − | − | 60 | 0.2720 | − | − | − | ||||
| Female | 79 | 11 | − | − | − | 16 | − | − | − | |||||||
| Age (years) | < 65 | 121 | 17 | 0.1136 | − | − | − | 31 | 0.6875 | − | − | − | ||||
| ≥ 65 | 174 | 35 | − | − | − | 45 | − | − | − | |||||||
| Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 84 | 1 | < 0.0001 | − | < 0.001 | 4 | |||||||||
| T1 | 88 | 9 | 23 | |||||||||||||
| T2-T4 | 123 | 42 | 49 | |||||||||||||
| Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 266 | 41 | 0.0002 | 1 | − | 0.182 | 61 | ||||||||
| Positive (N1-N2) | 29 | 11 | 1.211 | 0.799–3.254 | 15 | |||||||||||
| Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 2 | 0.0013 | 1 | − | 0.788 | 5 | 1 | − | 0.888 | |||||
| High grade | 239 | 50 | 2.066 | 0.172–3.805 | 71 | 1.468 | 0.380–3.054 | |||||||||
| Vascular invasion | Absent | 246 | 37 | 0.0024 | 1 | − | 0.157 | 54 | 1 | − | 0.675 | |||||
| Present | 49 | 15 | 1.608 | 0.307–1.209 | 22 | 1.055 | 0.488–1.590 | |||||||||
| Perineural invasion | Absent | 275 | 44 | 0.0001 | 0.088 | 66 | 1 | − | 0.167 | |||||||
| Present | 20 | 8 | 10 | 1.791 | 0.803–3.548 | |||||||||||
| Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | < 10 | 139 | 12 | < 0.0001 | 23 | |||||||||||
| >= 10 | 156 | 40 | 53 | |||||||||||||
| DDR2 expression | Low | 147 | 10 | < 0.0001 | 23 | |||||||||||
| High | 148 | 42 | 53 | |||||||||||||
Statistically significant.
Figure 5Survival analysis is depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves
Proven by log-rank tests, high expression of DDR2 is predictive for worse disease-specific survival in both UTUC and UBUC (A, C) and for poor metastasis-free survival in both UTUC and UBUC (B, D), respectively.
Figure 6DDR2 expression is associated with tumorigenic potential by enhancing proliferative, migratory, and invasive ability of tumor cells
(A) Endogenous DDR2 transcript expression are determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Compared with grade 1 UC cell line RT4, there are two grade 3 UC cell lines showing high DDR2 mRNA expression, including UMUC3 and BFTC909. (B) Both the high DDR2-expressing cell lines were subsequently infected by Lentivirus caring shRNA targeting DDR2 (shDDR2#1 and shDDR2#2). Successful knockdown of DDR2 was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. (C) Using 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) assay to examined cell viability, we demonstrate positive effects of DDR2 expression on cell proliferation. Similar results are identified for cell migratory (D) and invasive ability (E). The quantified results are illustrated as means ± sd. Error bars show the standard error. Data represents mean values of three independent experiments. Student's t-test is used, (*P < 0.05).