Literature DB >> 27791828

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Jacob A Miller1, Ehsan H Balagamwala2, Samuel T Chao2,3, Todd Emch4, John H Suh2,3, Toufik Djemil5, Lilyana Angelov3,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to define symptomatic and radiographic outcomes following spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of multiple myeloma. METHODS All patients with pathological diagnoses of myeloma undergoing spine SRS at a single institution were included. Patients with less than 1 month of follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of pain relief after spine SRS, while secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidences of radiographic failure and vertebral fracture. Pain scores before and after treatment were prospectively collected using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a validated questionnaire used to assess severity and impact of pain upon daily functions. RESULTS Fifty-six treatments (in 38 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Epidural disease was present in nearly all treatment sites (77%). Moreover, preexisting vertebral fracture (63%), thecal sac compression (55%), and neural foraminal involvement (48%) were common. Many treatment sites had undergone prior local therapy, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; 30%), surgery (23%), and kyphoplasty (21%). At the time of consultation for SRS, the worst, current, and average BPI pain scores at these treatment sites were 6, 4, and 4, respectively. The median prescription dose was 16 Gy in a single fraction. The median clinical follow-up duration after SRS was 26 months. The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of radiographic failure were 6% and 9%, respectively. Among painful treatment sites, 41% achieved pain relief adjusted for narcotic usage, with a median time to relief of 1.6 months. The 6- and 12-month cumulative incidences of adjusted pain progression were 13% and 15%, respectively. After SRS, 1-month and 3-month worst, current, and average BPI scores all significantly decreased (p < 0.01). Vertebral fracture occurred following 12 treatments (21%), with an 18% cumulative incidence of fracture at 6 and 12 months. Two patients (4%) developed pain flare following spine SRS. CONCLUSIONS This study reports the largest series of myeloma lesions treated with spine SRS. A rapid and durable symptomatic response was observed, with a median time to pain relief of 1.6 months. This response was durable among 85% of patients at 12 months following treatment, with 91% local control. The efficacy and minimal toxicity of spine SRS is likely related to the delivery of ablative and conformal radiation doses to the target. SRS should be considered with doses of 14-16 Gy in a single fraction for patients with multiple myeloma and limited spinal disease, myelosuppression requiring "marrow-sparing" radiation therapy, or recurrent disease after EBRT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPI = Brief Pain Inventory; EBRT = external beam radiation therapy; HD-MRI = high-definition MRI; HR = hazard ratio; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; multiple myeloma; oncology; spine radiosurgery; stereotactic body radiotherapy; vertebral metastasis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27791828     DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  Towards individualized radiation therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Felix Momm; Christine Greil; Henning Schäfer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Significance of preoperative peripheral blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in predicting postoperative survival in patients with multiple myeloma bone disease.

Authors:  Zi-Yu Xu; Xing-Chen Yao; Xiang-Jun Shi; Xin-Ru Du
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yining Gong; Lingyi Xu; Hongqing Zhuang; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Zhongjun Liu; Yan Li; Miao Yu; Kaiwen Ni; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  How Can Imaging Help the Radiation Oncologist in Multiple Myeloma Treatment.

Authors:  Liliana Belgioia; Stefano Vagge; Alberto Tagliafico; Renzo Corvò
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Unstable Pathologic Vertebral Fractures in Multiple Myeloma : Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study between Reconstructive Surgery with Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone.

Authors:  Hyung-Youl Park; Young-Hoon Kim; Joo-Hyun Ahn; Kee-Yong Ha; Sang-Il Kim; Jae-Woong Jung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-01-04

6.  Evaluating Treatment Strategies for Spinal Lesions in Multiple Myeloma: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manan Sunil Patel; Alexander Ghasem; Dylan N Greif; Samuel R Huntley; Sheila A Conway; Motasem Al Maaieh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.