Literature DB >> 27790991

Approaching a realistic force balance in geodynamo simulations.

Rakesh K Yadav1, Thomas Gastine2, Ulrich R Christensen3, Scott J Wolk4, Katja Poppenhaeger5.   

Abstract

Earth sustains its magnetic field by a dynamo process driven by convection in the liquid outer core. Geodynamo simulations have been successful in reproducing many observed properties of the geomagnetic field. However, although theoretical considerations suggest that flow in the core is governed by a balance between Lorentz force, rotational force, and buoyancy (called MAC balance for Magnetic, Archimedean, Coriolis) with only minute roles for viscous and inertial forces, dynamo simulations must use viscosity values that are many orders of magnitude larger than in the core, due to computational constraints. In typical geodynamo models, viscous and inertial forces are not much smaller than the Coriolis force, and the Lorentz force plays a subdominant role; this has led to conclusions that these simulations are viscously controlled and do not represent the physics of the geodynamo. Here we show, by a direct analysis of the relevant forces, that a MAC balance can be achieved when the viscosity is reduced to values close to the current practical limit. Lorentz force, buoyancy, and the uncompensated (by pressure) part of the Coriolis force are of very similar strength, whereas viscous and inertial forces are smaller by a factor of at least 20 in the bulk of the fluid volume. Compared with nonmagnetic convection at otherwise identical parameters, the dynamo flow is of larger scale and is less invariant parallel to the rotation axis (less geostrophic), and convection transports twice as much heat, all of which is expected when the Lorentz force strongly influences the convection properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  geodynamo; magnetohydrodynamics; planetary dynamos; rotating convection; turbulence

Year:  2016        PMID: 27790991      PMCID: PMC5087023          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608998113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos.

Authors:  Ulrich R Christensen; Andreas Tilgner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Cartesian convection driven dynamos at low Ekman number.

Authors:  Stephan Stellmach; Ulrich Hansen
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-11-23

Review 3.  On the genesis of the Earth's magnetism.

Authors:  Paul H Roberts; Eric M King
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2013-09-04

4.  Bottom-up control of geomagnetic secular variation by the Earth's inner core.

Authors:  Julien Aubert; Christopher C Finlay; Alexandre Fournier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Zonal flow formation in the Earth's core.

Authors:  Takehiro Miyagoshi; Akira Kageyama; Tetsuya Sato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Magnetostrophic balance as the optimal state for turbulent magnetoconvection.

Authors:  Eric M King; Jonathan M Aurnou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Approaching the asymptotic regime of rapidly rotating convection: boundary layers versus interior dynamics.

Authors:  S Stellmach; M Lischper; K Julien; G Vasil; J S Cheng; A Ribeiro; E M King; J M Aurnou
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Strong-field dynamo action in rapidly rotating convection with no inertia.

Authors:  David W Hughes; Fausto Cattaneo
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.529

9.  Melting of the Earth's inner core.

Authors:  David Gubbins; Binod Sreenivasan; Jon Mound; Sebastian Rost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  The cross-over to magnetostrophic convection in planetary dynamo systems.

Authors:  J M Aurnou; E M King
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Geomagnetic polar minima do not arise from steady meridional circulation.

Authors:  Hao Cao; Rakesh K Yadav; Jonathan M Aurnou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Characterization of columnar inertial modes in rapidly rotating spheres and spheroids.

Authors:  Stefano Maffei; Andrew Jackson; Philip W Livermore
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Force balance in rapidly rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection.

Authors:  Andrés J Aguirre Guzmán; Matteo Madonia; Jonathan S Cheng; Rodolfo Ostilla-Mónico; Herman J H Clercx; Rudie P J Kunnen
Journal:  J Fluid Mech       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.245

5.  Turbulent convective length scale in planetary cores.

Authors:  Céline Guervilly; Philippe Cardin; Nathanaël Schaeffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Determination of the instantaneous geostrophic flow within the three-dimensional magnetostrophic regime.

Authors:  Colin M Hardy; Philip W Livermore; Jitse Niesen; Jiawen Luo; Kuan Li
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Scale separated low viscosity dynamos and dissipation within the Earth's core.

Authors:  Andrey Sheyko; Christopher Finlay; Jean Favre; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Deep convection-driven vortex formation on Jupiter and Saturn.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Yadav; Moritz Heimpel; Jeremy Bloxham
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. I. Linear theory.

Authors:  Susanne Horn; Jonathan M Aurnou
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.213

10.  Rotation suppresses giant-scale solar convection.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Vasil; Keith Julien; Nicholas A Featherstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.