Literature DB >> 27790817

Extrapolating demography with climate, proximity and phylogeny: approach with caution.

Shaun R Coutts1,2,3, Roberto Salguero-Gómez1,2,3,4, Anna M Csergő3, Yvonne M Buckley1,3.   

Abstract

Plant population responses are key to understanding the effects of threats such as climate change and invasions. However, we lack demographic data for most species, and the data we have are often geographically aggregated. We determined to what extent existing data can be extrapolated to predict population performance across larger sets of species and spatial areas. We used 550 matrix models, across 210 species, sourced from the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, to model how climate, geographic proximity and phylogeny predicted population performance. Models including only geographic proximity and phylogeny explained 5-40% of the variation in four key metrics of population performance. However, there was poor extrapolation between species and extrapolation was limited to geographic scales smaller than those at which landscape scale threats typically occur. Thus, demographic information should only be extrapolated with caution. Capturing demography at scales relevant to landscape level threats will require more geographically extensive sampling.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database; comparative demography; damping ratio; elasticity; matrix population model; phylogenetic analysis; population growth rate (λ); spatially lagged models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27790817     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  5 in total

1.  Predicting invasion winners and losers under climate change.

Authors:  Yvonne M Buckley; Anna M Csergő
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Less favourable climates constrain demographic strategies in plants.

Authors:  Anna M Csergő; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Olivier Broennimann; Shaun R Coutts; Antoine Guisan; Amy L Angert; Erik Welk; Iain Stott; Brian J Enquist; Brian McGill; Jens-Christian Svenning; Cyrille Violle; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Global gene flow releases invasive plants from environmental constraints on genetic diversity.

Authors:  Annabel L Smith; Trevor R Hodkinson; Jesus Villellas; Jane A Catford; Anna Mária Csergő; Simone P Blomberg; Elizabeth E Crone; Johan Ehrlén; Maria B Garcia; Anna-Liisa Laine; Deborah A Roach; Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Glenda M Wardle; Dylan Z Childs; Bret D Elderd; Alain Finn; Sergi Munné-Bosch; Maude E A Baudraz; Judit Bódis; Francis Q Brearley; Anna Bucharova; Christina M Caruso; Richard P Duncan; John M Dwyer; Ben Gooden; Ronny Groenteman; Liv Norunn Hamre; Aveliina Helm; Ruth Kelly; Lauri Laanisto; Michele Lonati; Joslin L Moore; Melanie Morales; Siri Lie Olsen; Meelis Pärtel; William K Petry; Satu Ramula; Pil U Rasmussen; Simone Ravetto Enri; Anna Roeder; Christiane Roscher; Marjo Saastamoinen; Ayco J M Tack; Joachim Paul Töpper; Gregory E Vose; Elizabeth M Wandrag; Astrid Wingler; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Delivering the promises of trait-based approaches to the needs of demographic approaches, and vice versa.

Authors:  Roberto Salguero-Gómez; Cyrille Violle; Olivier Gimenez; Dylan Childs
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 5.608

5.  Latitudinal gradients in population growth do not reflect demographic responses to climate.

Authors:  Megan L DeMarche; Graham Bailes; Lauren B Hendricks; Laurel Pfeifer-Meister; Paul B Reed; Scott D Bridgham; Bart R Johnson; Robert Shriver; Ellen Waddle; Hannah Wroton; Daniel F Doak; Bitty A Roy; William F Morris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.