Ethan Bunting1, Litsa Lambrakos2, Paul Kemper3, William Whang2, Hasan Garan2, Elisa Konofagou4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York. 2. Division of Cardiology, Columbia University, New York, New York. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements in heart failure (HF) do not take into account the complex interplay between electrical activation and local wall motion. The utilization of novel technologies to better characterize cardiac electromechanical behavior may lead to improved response rates with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a noninvasive ultrasound-based technique that uses the transient deformations of the myocardium to track the intrinsic EW that precedes myocardial contraction. In this paper, we investigate the performance and reproducibility of EWI in the assessment of HF patients and CRT. METHODS: EWI acquisitions were obtained in five healthy controls and 16 HF patients with and without CRT pacing. Responders (n = 8) and nonresponders (n = 8) to CRT were identified retrospectively on the basis of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling. Electromechanical activation maps were obtained in all patients and used to compute a quantitative parameter describing the mean LV lateral wall activation time (LWAT). RESULTS: Mean LWAT was increased by 52.1 ms in HF patients in native rhythm compared to controls (P < 0.01). For all HF patients, CRT pacing initiated a different electromechanical activation sequence. Responders exhibited a 56.4-ms ± 28.9-ms reduction in LWAT with CRT pacing (P < 0.01), while nonresponders showed no significant change. CONCLUSION: In this initial feasibility study, EWI was capable of characterizing local cardiac electromechanical behavior as it pertains to HF and CRT response. Activation sequences obtained with EWI allow for quantification of LV lateral wall electromechanical activation, thus providing a novel method for CRT assessment.
BACKGROUND: Current electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements in heart failure (HF) do not take into account the complex interplay between electrical activation and local wall motion. The utilization of novel technologies to better characterize cardiac electromechanical behavior may lead to improved response rates with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a noninvasive ultrasound-based technique that uses the transient deformations of the myocardium to track the intrinsic EW that precedes myocardial contraction. In this paper, we investigate the performance and reproducibility of EWI in the assessment of HF patients and CRT. METHODS: EWI acquisitions were obtained in five healthy controls and 16 HF patients with and without CRT pacing. Responders (n = 8) and nonresponders (n = 8) to CRT were identified retrospectively on the basis of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling. Electromechanical activation maps were obtained in all patients and used to compute a quantitative parameter describing the mean LV lateral wall activation time (LWAT). RESULTS: Mean LWAT was increased by 52.1 ms in HF patients in native rhythm compared to controls (P < 0.01). For all HF patients, CRT pacing initiated a different electromechanical activation sequence. Responders exhibited a 56.4-ms ± 28.9-ms reduction in LWAT with CRT pacing (P < 0.01), while nonresponders showed no significant change. CONCLUSION: In this initial feasibility study, EWI was capable of characterizing local cardiac electromechanical behavior as it pertains to HF and CRT response. Activation sequences obtained with EWI allow for quantification of LV lateral wall electromechanical activation, thus providing a novel method for CRT assessment.
Authors: Jean Provost; Vu Thanh-Hieu Nguyen; Diégo Legrand; Stan Okrasinski; Alexandre Costet; Alok Gambhir; Hasan Garan; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael R Gold; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Jagmeet P Singh; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Yinghong Yu; Timothy E Meyer; Milan Seth; Patrick J Tchou Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christopher S Grubb; Lea Melki; Daniel Y Wang; James Peacock; Jose Dizon; Vivek Iyer; Carmine Sorbera; Angelo Biviano; David A Rubin; John P Morrow; Deepak Saluja; Andrew Tieu; Pierre Nauleau; Rachel Weber; Salma Chaudhary; Irfan Khurram; Marc Waase; Hasan Garan; Elisa E Konofagou; Elaine Y Wan Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Lea Melki; Daniel Y Wang; Christopher S Grubb; Rachel Weber; Angelo Biviano; Elaine Y Wan; Hasan Garan; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 7.722