Pradeepa H Dakappa1, Gopalkrishna K Bhat2, Ganaraja Bolumbu3, Sathish B Rao4, Sushma Adappa5, Chakrapani Mahabala6. 1. Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India . 2. Additional Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India . 3. Additional Professor, Department of Physiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India . 4. Additional Professor, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India . 5. Research Assistant, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India . 6. Professor, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University , Mangalore, Karnataka, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Detection of accurate body temperature fluctu-ations in hospitalized patients is crucial for appropriate clinical decision-making. The accuracy and reliability of body temperature assessment may significantly affect the proper treatment. AIM: To compare the conventional and continuous body temperature recordings in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out at a tertiary care centre and study included 55 patients aged between 18-65 years with a history of fever admitted to a tertiary care hospital. A noninvasive continuous temperature recording was done using TherCom® device through tympanic temperature probe at tympanic site at one-minute intervals for 24 hours. The conventional temperatures were recorded in the axilla using mercury thermometer at specific time intervals at 12:00 noon, 8:00 PM and 5:00 AM. Peak temperature differences between continuous and conventional methods were compared by applying Independent sample t-test. Intra class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) test was performed to assess the reliability between two temperature-monitoring methods. A p<0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The average peak temperature by non-invasive continuous recording method was 39.07°C ±0.76°C while it was 37.55°C ±0.62°C by the conventional method. A significant temperature difference of 1.52°C [p<0.001;95% CI(1.26-1.78)] was observed between continuous and conventional temperature methods. Intra class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between continuous and conventional temperature readings at 12:00 noon was α= 0.540, which had moderate reliability. The corresponding coefficients at 8:00 PM and 5:00 AM were α=0.425 and 0.435, respectively, which had poor reliability. CONCLUSION: The conventional recording of temperature is routinely practiced and does not reflect the true temperature fluctuations. However, the continuous non-invasive temperature recording is simple, inexpensive and a better tool for recording the actual temperature changes.
INTRODUCTION: Detection of accurate body temperature fluctu-ations in hospitalized patients is crucial for appropriate clinical decision-making. The accuracy and reliability of body temperature assessment may significantly affect the proper treatment. AIM: To compare the conventional and continuous body temperature recordings in hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out at a tertiary care centre and study included 55 patients aged between 18-65 years with a history of fever admitted to a tertiary care hospital. A noninvasive continuous temperature recording was done using TherCom® device through tympanic temperature probe at tympanic site at one-minute intervals for 24 hours. The conventional temperatures were recorded in the axilla using mercury thermometer at specific time intervals at 12:00 noon, 8:00 PM and 5:00 AM. Peak temperature differences between continuous and conventional methods were compared by applying Independent sample t-test. Intra class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) test was performed to assess the reliability between two temperature-monitoring methods. A p<0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The average peak temperature by non-invasive continuous recording method was 39.07°C ±0.76°C while it was 37.55°C ±0.62°C by the conventional method. A significant temperature difference of 1.52°C [p<0.001;95% CI(1.26-1.78)] was observed between continuous and conventional temperature methods. Intra class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between continuous and conventional temperature readings at 12:00 noon was α= 0.540, which had moderate reliability. The corresponding coefficients at 8:00 PM and 5:00 AM were α=0.425 and 0.435, respectively, which had poor reliability. CONCLUSION: The conventional recording of temperature is routinely practiced and does not reflect the true temperature fluctuations. However, the continuous non-invasive temperature recording is simple, inexpensive and a better tool for recording the actual temperature changes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body temperature; Continuous recording; Conventional recording; Fever; Temperature fluctuations
Authors: Manuel Varela; Marta Calvo; Miriam Chana; Ivan Gomez-Mestre; Rosa Asensio; Pedro Galdos Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.598