Literature DB >> 27790458

A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Pruthak C Shah1, Ashwin K Panchasara2, Manish J Barvaliya3, C B Tripathi4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Application form of research work is an essential requirement which is required to be submitted along with the research proposal to the Ethics Committee (EC). AIM: To check the completeness and to find the errors in application forms submitted to the EC of a tertiary care hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The application forms of research projects submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India from January 2014 to June 2015 were analysed for completeness and errors, with respect to the following - type of study, information about study investigators, sample size, study participants, title of the studies, signatures of all investigators, regulatory approval, recruitment procedure, compensation to study participants, informed consent process, information about sponsor, declaration of conflict of interest, plans for storage and maintenance of data, patient information sheet, informed consent forms and study related documents.
RESULTS: Total 100 application forms were analysed. Among them, 98 were academic and 2 were industrial studies. Majority of academic studies were of basic science type. In 63.26% studies, type of study was not mentioned in title. Age group of subjects was not mentioned in 8.16% application forms. In 34.6% informed consent, benefits of the study were not mentioned. Signature of investigators/co-investigators/Head of the Department was missing in 3.06% cases.
CONCLUSION: Our study recommends that the efficiency and speed of review will increase if investigator will increase vigilance regarding filling of application forms. Regular meetings will be helpful to solve the problems related to content of application forms. The uniformity in functioning of EC can be achieved if common application form for all ECs is there.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic; Clinical trial; Industrial

Year:  2016        PMID: 27790458      PMCID: PMC5071958          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18393.8488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  10 in total

1.  The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.

Authors:  J Tully; N Ninis; R Booy; R Viner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study.

Authors:  N A Maskell; E L Jones; R J O Davies
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2003-04

3.  Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: a five nation study.

Authors:  Maureen H Fitzgerald; Paul A Phillips
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  The promise and pitfalls of clinical trials overseas.

Authors:  Dennis Normile
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Guidelines for local research ethics committees: distinguishing between patient and population research in the Multicentre Research Project.

Authors:  R Benster; A M Pollock
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.427

6.  U. S. Health Researchers Review their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Kathryn Moss
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  A study to assess completeness of project application forms submitted to Institutional Ethics Committees (IEC) of a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Yashashri C Shetty; Padmaja A Marathe; Gauri V Billa; C P Neelima Nambiar
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2012-10

8.  Postgraduate pharmacology curriculum in medical institutions in India: time for need-based appraisal and modifications.

Authors:  Dinesh K Badyal; Chetna Desai; Santanu K Tripathi; S P Dhaneria; Sujith J Chandy; B K Bezbaruah
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.200

9.  Principal investigator views of the IRB system.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney; Kirsten Alcser; Carl Schneider; Laurence B McCullough; Amy L McGuire; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Research ethics committees: Need for harmonization at the national level, the global and Indian perspective.

Authors:  Aparna Sanjiv Walanj
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2014-04
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Sangeetha Paramasivan; Philippa Davies; Alison Richards; Julia Wade; Leila Rooshenas; Nicola Mills; Alba Realpe; Jeffrey Pradeep Raj; Supriya Subramani; Jonathan Ives; Richard Huxtable; Jane M Blazeby; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.