Literature DB >> 2779025

Postoperative infection prophylaxis for upper gastrointestinal tract surgery--a prospective and comparative randomized study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime.

T Fukui1, N Shinagawa, T Takaoka, K Mashita, A Mizuno, I Mizuno, J Yura.   

Abstract

A prospective and randomized clinical study was conducted in order to compare cefoxitin (CFX) and ceftizoxime (CZX) as prophylactic antibiotics. Two hundred and three consecutive cases of elective upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, performed at our institute between January, 1983, and March, 1986, were entered in the trial. The patients were assigned randomly, before surgery, to the CFX or to the CZX group. Two grams of the assigned antibiotic was first administered during surgery and then continued at a dose of 1 gram, every 8 hrs for a total of 4 days. One patient was withdrawn from the study due to an allergic reaction. Both groups were comparable in sex, age, underlying disease, diagnosis, operation, and preoperative laboratory data. There were 18 infections related to the operation in the CFX group, while there were only 3 in the CZX group (p less than 0.001). The number of unrelated infections in each group was 6 and 6 respectively (NS). No special differences were found between the two groups regarding the kinds of microorganisms isolated, and no significant differences were seen in the adverse effects of either antibiotic. Our study demonstrated that ceftizoxime was more efficient than cefoxitin in preventing postoperative infection, following upper gastrointestinal tract surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2779025     DOI: 10.1007/BF02471399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Surg        ISSN: 0047-1909


  9 in total

1.  The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.

Authors:  J F Burke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis and cardiac surgery. A prospective double-blind comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose regimens.

Authors:  J E Conte; S N Cohen; B B Roe; R M Elashoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Treatment of intra-abdominal infections is appropriate with single-agent or combination antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  M A Malangoni; R E Condon; C A Spiegel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Comparative study of cefazolin, cefoxitin, and ceftizoxime for surgical prophylaxis in colo-rectal surgery.

Authors:  D G Maki; D R Aughey
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  R L Nichols; J W Smith; D B Klein; D D Trunkey; R H Cooper; M F Adinolfi; J Mills
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. An experimental study.

Authors:  K S Scher; A F Wroczynski; C W Jones
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  A randomized comparison of cefoxitin with or without amikacin and clindamycin plus amikacin in surgical sepsis.

Authors:  F P Tally; K McGowan; J M Kellum; S L Gorbach; T F O'Donnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in colorectal surgery: effect on the colon microflora and septic complications--a clinical model for prediction of the benefit and risks in using a new antibiotic in prophylaxis.

Authors:  L Kager; I Ljungdahl; A S Malmborg; C E Nord; R Pieper; P Dahlgren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.