| Literature DB >> 27790195 |
Ramila C Rodrigues1, Nabila Haddad1, Didier Chevret2, Jean-Michel Cappelier1, Odile Tresse1.
Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni accounts for one of the leading causes of foodborne bacterial enteritis in humans. Despite being considered an obligate microaerobic microorganism, C. jejuni is regularly exposed to oxidative stress. However, its adaptive strategies to survive the atmospheric oxygen level during transmission to humans remain unclear. Recently, the clinical C. jejuni strain Bf was singled out for its unexpected ability to grow under ambient atmosphere. Here, we aimed to understand better the biological mechanisms underlying its atypical aerotolerance trait using two-dimensional protein electrophoresis, gene expression, and enzymatic activities. Forty-seven proteins were identified with a significantly different abundance between cultivation under microaerobic and aerobic conditions. The over-expressed proteins in aerobiosis belonged mainly to the oxidative stress response, enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, iron uptake, and regulation, and amino acid uptake when compared to microaerobic conditions. The higher abundance of proteins related to oxidative stress was correlated to dramatically higher transcript levels of the corresponding encoding genes in aerobic conditions compared to microaerobic conditions. In addition, a higher catalase-equivalent activity in strain Bf was observed. Despite the restricted catabolic capacities of C. jejuni, this study reveals that strain Bf is equipped to withstand oxidative stress. This ability could contribute to emergence and persistence of particular strains of C. jejuni throughout food processing or macrophage attack during human infection.Entities:
Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni; aerotolerance; foodborne pathogen; oxidative stress; proteomics
Year: 2016 PMID: 27790195 PMCID: PMC5061731 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Primers used in this study.
| CCTACGGGAGGCACGAG | |
| CTACCAGGGTATCTAATCC | |
| TTCGTACGGCTGGAGATAAG | |
| GTGAAAGAACAGGCGAAGAG | |
| CAAACAGCTATGATAATAGCC | |
| GGAGCATATCTTTGTGCTACG | |
| CTTCAAACGCAGCTACACCA | |
| CCCAGTTAATATGAGCATAGAA | |
| GCCAGTTACAATGGTGCTGA | |
| TTTGCCACAAAATCACTTGC | |
| AGCCCAAGTTATGGATGGAA | |
| TTTGGAGCTGAGCCTGT | |
| AAGGGCCATGATGACTTGACG | |
| AGCGCAACCCACGTATTTAG |
Figure 12-DE electrophoretic profiles of . A total of 30 μg proteins was separated on IPG strips with pI 4-7 (A,B) and pI 6-11 (C,D) followed by a 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE. Arrows indicate over-expressed proteins. Two replicates from each three independent protein extraction were performed for each condition.
Identification of proteins predominantly affected in .
| tr|Q0PBH5 | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase | 6.27E-03 | +2.0 | 21.9/5.66 | −110.26 | 25/75 (84%) | |
| 2.03E-02 | +1.8 | −82.37 | 13/171 (65%) | ||||
| 6.01E-03 | +2.5 | −88.39 | 22/46 (57%) | ||||
| sp|Q59296 | Catalase | 1.08E-02 | +1.7 | 58.29/7.74 | −102.42 | 22/53 (46%) | |
| sp|Q9PPE0 | Probable thiol peroxidase | 7.25E-03 | +1.7 | 18.40/5.13 | −63.49 | 8/22 (47%) | |
| tr|Q0PBZ1 | Thioredoxin reductase | 3.92E-02 | +1.5 | 33/5.60 | −92.07 | 11/60 (57%) | |
| 3.55E-03 | +2.8 | −65.10 | 9/22 (37%) | ||||
| sp|O69289 | 60 kDa chaperonin | 7.39E-03 | −1.8 | 57.79/5.02 | −279.73 | 40/187 (65%) | |
| 1.42E-02 | +2.0 | −33.35 | 6/10 (15%) | ||||
| 1.07E-02 | +2.1 | −7.86 | 2/3 (6%) | ||||
| 5.46E-03 | +1.5 | −211.64 | 31/50 (52%) | ||||
| 4.42E-02 | −2.2 | −186.05 | 34/51 (58%) | ||||
| 2.99E-02 | −1.7 | −227.73 | 34/89 (59%) | ||||
| sp|Q0P891 | DNA protection during starvation protein | 2.56E-04 | +2.9 | 17.1/5.55 | −13.89 | 4/4 (34%) | |
| sp|Q9PI02 | Chaperone protein | 7.25E-03 | +1.7 | 95.40/5.47 | −110.17 | 27/46 (34%) | |
| ClpB | 1.40E-02 | +1.7 | −62.96 | 16/20 (22%) | |||
| sp|O69298 | Chaperone protein DnaK | 2.46E-02 | +1.6 | 67.30/4.97 | −270.16 | 48/85 (50%) | |
| tr|Q0P7X0 | Periplasmic protein | 1.15E-03 | +1.5 | 19.6/4.97 | −97.57 | 16/70 (64%) | |
| 1.05E-02 | −1.5 | −39.82 | 5/77 (50%) | ||||
| tr|Q0P8K8 | Putative periplasmic protein | 4.13E-02 | +2.3 | 24.9/5.89 | −17.77 | 8/9 (39%) | |
| tr|Q0P8M9 | Peb1A major cell-binding factor | 6.10E-03 | +1.5 | −46.86 | 13/14 (45%) | ||
| tr|Q0PAQ4 | Putative periplasmic phosphate binding protein | 1.58E-04 | −2.3 | 36/5.76 | −111.37 | 20/70 (58%) | |
| tr|Q0PBW4 | Putative iron-uptake ABC transport system periplasmic iron-binding protein | 4.08E-03 | +2.1 | 37.4/8.97 | −111.73 | 20/86 (57%) | |
| tr|Q0P9N4 | Branched-chain amino-acid ABC transport system periplasmic binding protein | 1.95E-02 | +2.0 | 39.59/8.70 | −86.36 | 11/17 (35%) | |
| 3.76E-02 | +2.2 | −86.38 | 11/35% | ||||
| sp|O69294 | Fumarate hydratase | 1.39E-03 | +1.9 | 50.59/6.12 | −138.94 | 27/109 (51%) | |
| 1.61E-03 | +1.7 | −156.55 | 30/48 (53%) | ||||
| tr|Q0PBA1 | Fumarate reductase flavoprotein subunit | 6.03E-04 | +2.2 | 73.59/6.36 | −136.96 | 27/71 (44%) | |
| 2.32E-04 | +2.2 | −121.49 | 25/42 (43%) | ||||
| tr|Q0P8X0 | Malate oxidoreductase | 1.82E-03 | +2.4 | 43.90/5.78 | −94.02 | 16/49 (40%) | |
| tr|Q0P7U8 | Citrate synthase | 1.49E-04 | +3.1 | 47.90/6.47 | −80.33 | 17/42 (48%) | |
| tr|Q0PA55 | Aconitate hydratase 2 | 6.73E-03 | −1.6 | 92.59/6.04 | −144.40 | 27/82 (41%) | |
| 1.97E-02 | −1.6 | −196.23 | 32/117 (46%) | ||||
| 2.30E-02 | −1.5 | −222.33 | 37/142 (50%) | ||||
| tr|Q0PAY0 | 2-oxoglutarate:acceptor oxidoreductase | 5.26E-03 | +1.8 | 40.90/6.12 | −74.90 | 17/37 (42%) | |
| sp|Q0PC30 | ATP synthase subunit beta | 1.77E-02 | +1.5 | 50.70/4.97 | −137.76 | 25/127 (59%) | |
| tr|Q0PB68 | 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase 2 | 3.54E-02 | −1.5 | 42.59/5.64 | −180.60 | 29/103 (58%) | |
| 1.60E-02 | −1.5 | −74.51 | 12/146 (53%) | ||||
| tr|Q0P9A5 | ADP-L-glycero-D-manno-heptose-6-epimerase | 3.59E-04 | −1.7 | 35.90/6.12 | −138.21 | 23/73 (69%) | |
| sp|P71128 | Cysteine synthase B | 6.28E-04 | −1.8 | 32.30/6.34 | −82.93 | 16/67 (57%) | |
| 6.72E-03 | −2.2 | −19.81 | 3/21 (21%) | ||||
| tr|Q0PAU2 | Acetolactate synthase small subunit | 1.48E-02 | +1.8 | 17.3/6.75 | −26.11 | 8/10 (52%) | |
| tr|Q0P9F8 | S-adenosylmethionine synthetase | 4.04E-02 | −1.6 | 43.7/5.45 | −103.70 | 19/63 (56%) | |
| 6.50E-03 | −1.9 | −126.01 | 25/86 (55%) | ||||
| 3.21E-02 | −1.9 | −142.72 | 27/102 (59%) | ||||
| tr|Q0PB65 | Putative MCP-type signal transduction protein | 3.17E-02 | +1.6 | 40.40/5.58 | −80.75 | 15/55 (47%) | |
| sp|Q9PN97 | S-ribosylhomocysteine lyase | 7.25E-03 | +1.7 | 18.10/6.19 | −38.61 | 7/16 (50%) | |
Normalized spots were compared for their abundance between aerobic and microaerobic conditions. Significant difference is indicated for each spot.
Positive values correspond to the fold of higher abundance in aerobic conditions and negative values correspond to the fold of lower abundance in aerobic conditions for each spot.
Each protein was identified with a mass tolerance < 20 ppm and at least two peptides.
No. of MP/TP (Pc): Number of matched/total peptides (Protein coverage).
Figure 4Main metabolic pathways required by . The arrows indicate the differential abundance of enzymes when Bf is cultivated under aerobic conditions as compared to cells grown in microaerobiosis.
Figure 2Transcript levels of . Transcript levels were measured by RT-qPCR and calculated using the critical threshold (ΔΔC) method with rrs gene as the internal control. Results were normalized to the gene transcription of the reference strain C. jejuni NCTC 11168 in microaerobic conditions. Error bars represents the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Significant differences, indicated by a different letter, were determined using the Student's t-test comparisons with a 5% confidence level.
Figure 3Catalase-equivalent activity of . H2O2cleavage was first assessed over time in the presence of calibrated quantities of bovine liver catalase and a correlation was calculated between the rate of decrease in absorbance of H2O2 and bovine liver catalase activity (y = 0.0153x–0.0026; R2 = 0.97). (A) Catalase-equivalent activity of C. jejuni Bf in microaerobic conditions (MAC), in aerobic conditions (AC) and after acclimation to aerobic conditions (AAC), C. jejuni 11168 was used as a control; (B) Bubble production of C. jejuni Bf in MAC, AC, and ACC mediated by the breakdown of H2O2 to water and dioxygen gas. C. jejuni 11168 was used as a control. Plotted points are the mean measurements from three independent experiments. Significant differences, indicated by a different letter, were determined using the Student's t-test comparisons at 5% confidence level.