Aoy Tomita-Mitchell1, Karl D Stamm2,3, Donna K Mahnke2, Min-Su Kim2, Pip M Hidestrand4, Huan Ling Liang2, Mary A Goetsch2, Mats Hidestrand2, Pippa Simpson5, Andrew N Pelech6, James S Tweddell7, D Woodrow Benson5, John W Lough8, Michael E Mitchell2. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; amitchell@mcw.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 4. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine. 5. Department of Pediatrics, and Children's Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Pediatric Heart Center, UC Davis Children's Hospital, Sacramento, California; and. 7. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8. Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a clinically and anatomically severe form of congenital heart disease (CHD). Although prior studies suggest that HLHS has a complex genetic inheritance, its etiology remains largely unknown. The goal of this study was to characterize a risk gene in HLHS and its effect on HLHS etiology and outcome. We performed next-generation sequencing on a multigenerational family with a high prevalence of CHD/HLHS, identifying a rare variant in the α-myosin heavy chain (MYH6) gene. A case-control study of 190 unrelated HLHS subjects was then performed and compared with the 1000 Genomes Project. Damaging MYH6 variants, including novel, missense, in-frame deletion, premature stop, de novo, and compound heterozygous variants, were significantly enriched in HLHS cases (P < 1 × 10-5). Clinical outcomes analysis showed reduced transplant-free survival in HLHS subjects with damaging MYH6 variants (P < 1 × 10-2). Transcriptome and protein expression analyses with cardiac tissue revealed differential expression of cardiac contractility genes, notably upregulation of the β-myosin heavy chain (MYH7) gene in subjects with MYH6 variants (P < 1 × 10-3). We subsequently used patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model HLHS in vitro. Early stages of in vitro cardiomyogenesis in iPSCs derived from two unrelated HLHS families mimicked the increased expression of MYH7 observed in vivo (P < 1 × 10-2), while revealing defective cardiomyogenic differentiation. Rare, damaging variants in MYH6 are enriched in HLHS, affect molecular expression of contractility genes, and are predictive of poor outcome. These findings indicate that the etiology of MYH6-associated HLHS can be informed using iPSCs and suggest utility in future clinical applications.
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a clinically and anatomically severe form of congenital heart disease (CHD). Although prior studies suggest that HLHS has a complex genetic inheritance, its etiology remains largely unknown. The goal of this study was to characterize a risk gene in HLHS and its effect on HLHS etiology and outcome. We performed next-generation sequencing on a multigenerational family with a high prevalence of CHD/HLHS, identifying a rare variant in the α-myosin heavy chain (MYH6) gene. A case-control study of 190 unrelated HLHS subjects was then performed and compared with the 1000 Genomes Project. Damaging MYH6 variants, including novel, missense, in-frame deletion, premature stop, de novo, and compound heterozygous variants, were significantly enriched in HLHS cases (P < 1 × 10-5). Clinical outcomes analysis showed reduced transplant-free survival in HLHS subjects with damaging MYH6 variants (P < 1 × 10-2). Transcriptome and protein expression analyses with cardiac tissue revealed differential expression of cardiac contractility genes, notably upregulation of the β-myosin heavy chain (MYH7) gene in subjects with MYH6 variants (P < 1 × 10-3). We subsequently used patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model HLHS in vitro. Early stages of in vitro cardiomyogenesis in iPSCs derived from two unrelated HLHS families mimicked the increased expression of MYH7 observed in vivo (P < 1 × 10-2), while revealing defective cardiomyogenic differentiation. Rare, damaging variants in MYH6 are enriched in HLHS, affect molecular expression of contractility genes, and are predictive of poor outcome. These findings indicate that the etiology of MYH6-associated HLHS can be informed using iPSCs and suggest utility in future clinical applications.
hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a clinically and anatomically severe form of congenital heart disease (CHD). HLHS, characterized by hypoplasia of the ascending aorta and left ventricle, was first described by Noonan and Nadas (32). HLHS accounts for as much as 4% of subjects with CHD but is responsible for 15–25% of CHD-related mortality (3). The cause of HLHS is unknown in most cases.Evidence supporting a genetic basis for HLHS includes observations of familial clustering and high heritability (16) and concurrence with specific chromosomal disorders such as Turner and Jacobsen syndrome. Variants in genes such as GJA1 (7), NKX2.5 (10), NOTCH1 (11), and most recently, myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6) (38) as well as observations of syndromic or rare copy number variants in cardiogenic genes (13, 14, 39, 41) have been associated with HLHS. Increased frequency of left-ventricular outflow tract obstructions (LVOTO) such as bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and coarctation of the aorta (CoA) have been noted in relatives of HLHS subjects (16, 17, 23, 24, 29). Although these studies indicate an underlying genetic basis, known risk factors currently explain <5% of HLHS etiology (16, 17).In this study, next-generation sequencing of a multigenerational CHD/HLHS family revealed a novel variant in the MYH6 gene. Although MYH6 variants have been previously associated with cardiac phenotypes (1, 4, 6, 12, 33, 38), to better understand their role in HLHS we have employed a multifaceted approach including a case-control association study, transcriptome analysis of patient cardiac tissue, clinical outcomes, and the use of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model HLHS disease in vitro. Results reveal that a significant percentage of HLHS patients have rare and damaging MYH6 variants that impact the expression of other sarcomere genes and are predictive of poor clinical outcomes. Moreover, experiments using patient-derived cardiomyocytes indicate that HLHS may have a cardiomyocyte-autonomous etiology that can be investigated via in vitro modeling with iPSCs.
METHODS
Study Participants
HLHS was strictly defined by atresia or stenosis of the aortic and mitral valves and hypoplasia of the left ventricle and ascending aorta, with intact ventricular septum (36). Subjects with complex cardiovascular malformations combined with left ventricle hypoplasia (such as unbalanced atrioventricular septal defects or double-outlet right ventricle) were excluded. Subjects with known genetic syndromes (Trisomy 18, 21, or Turner syndrome) or with extracardiac malformations suggestive of a genetic syndrome were also excluded. See supplementary methods: phenotyping cardiac malformations for additional details. This study is in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and institutionally approved research (IRB) protocols by the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (CHW, Milwaukee, WI). Subjects were consented through the CHD Tissue Bank (IRB #CHW 06/229, GC 300) and the Wisconsin Pediatric Cardiac Registry (IRB #CHW 09/91, GC 889), IRB-approved research databases housed at CHW prior to inclusion in the study (15, 39). Both biorepositories provided all DNA samples, as well as cardiac tissue, from patients and family members, with associated clinical outcome variables.
Multistage Approach to Investigate HLHS
Figure 1 depicts the multistage approach used in this study to investigate the role of MYH6 in HLHS, as follows.
Fig. 1.
Five-stage study design. Stage 1 analyzed the pedigree of family F MYH6-R443P. Stage 2 was a case-control association study assessing rare α-myosin heavy chain gene (MYH6) variants in 190 unrelated hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) subjects. Stage 3 assessed the clinical outcome of MYH6 variant carriers compared with non-MYH6 variant carriers. Stage 4 utilized transcriptome sequencing and Western blotting to compare gene expression in HLHS subjects with and without MYH6 variants. Stage 5 employed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model HLHS disease in 2 unrelated families with MYH6 variants.
Five-stage study design. Stage 1 analyzed the pedigree of family F MYH6-R443P. Stage 2 was a case-control association study assessing rare α-myosin heavy chain gene (MYH6) variants in 190 unrelated hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) subjects. Stage 3 assessed the clinical outcome of MYH6 variant carriers compared with non-MYH6 variant carriers. Stage 4 utilized transcriptome sequencing and Western blotting to compare gene expression in HLHS subjects with and without MYH6 variants. Stage 5 employed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to model HLHS disease in 2 unrelated families with MYH6 variants.
Stage 1: multigenerational HLHS family.
We used next-generation sequencing to evaluate a multigenerational family (F MYH6-R443P) identified by a proband with HLHS through the CHD Tissue Bank. Other family members had CHDs affecting left-sided heart structures, including a second case of HLHS as shown in the pedigree (Fig. 2). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on the proband, affected sibling, father, and mother (IV:3, IV:1, III:1, and III:2). Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on the paternal great aunt (II:4). For technical processing and variant filtering see supplemental methods: next generation sequencing and supplemental methods: additional stage 1 analysis.
Fig. 2.
Pedigree of family MYH6: R443P, variant filtering scheme and MYH6 variants in a case-control study. A: black squares and circles denote patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstructions (LVOTO; III:1, III:9, IV:1, IV:3). Striping denotes ventricular septal defect, unrelated heart defect to HLHS. Gray-shaded symbols denote subjects with uncertain or no diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). White squares/circles denote patients without CHD. Genotypes denoted R443P indicate heterozygous carriers of an MYH6 variant. WT, wild type; symbols without a genotype are of unknown genotype. Squares, male; circles, female; triangles, fetal demise. B: identification and filtering variants in affected siblings and a distant relative followed by subtracting variants in the unaffected mother identified 20 candidate genes. Among them, MYH6 was the only candidate highly expressed in the heart. C: loci of 19 distinct rare MYH6 variants discovered in 190 HLHS subjects. Left to right: loci of variants in the MYH6 gene encoding the head, neck, and coiled-coil (tail) regions of α-MHC protein. Dots denote variants in HLHS subjects.
Pedigree of family MYH6: R443P, variant filtering scheme and MYH6 variants in a case-control study. A: black squares and circles denote patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstructions (LVOTO; III:1, III:9, IV:1, IV:3). Striping denotes ventricular septal defect, unrelated heart defect to HLHS. Gray-shaded symbols denote subjects with uncertain or no diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). White squares/circles denote patients without CHD. Genotypes denoted R443P indicate heterozygous carriers of an MYH6 variant. WT, wild type; symbols without a genotype are of unknown genotype. Squares, male; circles, female; triangles, fetal demise. B: identification and filtering variants in affected siblings and a distant relative followed by subtracting variants in the unaffected mother identified 20 candidate genes. Among them, MYH6 was the only candidate highly expressed in the heart. C: loci of 19 distinct rare MYH6 variants discovered in 190 HLHS subjects. Left to right: loci of variants in the MYH6 gene encoding the head, neck, and coiled-coil (tail) regions of α-MHC protein. Dots denote variants in HLHS subjects.
Stage 2: case-control association study.
DNA samples were obtained from 190 unrelated HLHS probands. Control genomes were from the 1000 Genomes project (1,063 unrelated individuals of African, Amerindian, Asian, or European descent). (40) Rare, damaging variants (see supplemental methods: next generation sequencing) identified in candidate genes from Stage 1 were individually tested comparing carriers vs. noncarriers in HLHS cases vs. controls (Fisher's exact test).
Stage 3: transplant-free survival analysis.
We defined clinical outcomes by comparing transplant-free survival data of HLHS subjects with and without rare, damaging MYH6 variants. Poor outcome was defined as death or cardiac transplant. Survival was assessed in subjects aged 6 yr or older using Kaplan-Meier curves; a Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon) statistic was used to evaluate significance.
Stage 4: mRNA expression/protein expression.
Cardiac tissue discards from HLHS subjects undergoing surgery were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA or protein isolation. Transcriptome sequencing and Western blot analysis were performed as described in the supplementary appendix. Pairwise analysis was performed, comparing subjects with and without rare, damaging MYH6 variants matched by age, tissue type, and when possible, by sex and cardiac anatomy (mitral and aortic valve) (Supplemental Table S2). The same matched tissue pairings were also analyzed by Western blot analysis.
Stage 5: HLHS modeling with iPSCs.
iPSC lines were generated from dermal fibroblasts donated by two unrelated HLHS probands and their parents (two family trios), denoted as families F MYH6-R443P and F MYH6-D588A, to the CHD Tissue Bank. Fibroblasts were reprogrammed to pluripotent stem cells using Sendai reprogramming (ReGen Theranostics, Rochester, MN), after which they were returned to CHW (Milwaukee, WI) for experimentation. iPSCs cultured under hypoxic conditions on matrigel in mTeSR1 medium were judged pluripotent from morphological appearance (Supplemental Fig. S3), percentages of cells exhibiting positive Oct4 immunostaining (99–100%), being karyotypically normal (Supplemental Fig. S3), and the ability to differentiate into multiple lineages (definitive endoderm and cardiomyogenic mesoderm) (21). Experimenters were blinded as to the identity of family members from whom each line was generated. Details are described in supplementary materials: ipsc cardiomyocyte differentiation and in ipsc analysis.
RESULTS
A five-stage approach was employed to elucidate the role of MYH6 variants in HLHS. In stage 1, members of family F MYH6-R443P were analyzed with next-generation sequencing identifying a rare variant in the MYH6 gene. In stage 2, a case-control analysis confirmed that rare, damaging MYH6 variants were highly enriched among 190 unrelated HLHS subjects. Stage 3 determined the clinical outcome of HLHS subjects with and without rare, damaging MYH6 variants. Stage 4 utilized transcriptome sequencing and Western blot analysis to compare gene expression in HLHS subjects with and without rare, damaging MYH6 variants. Stage 5 employed iPSCs to model HLHS disease in two unrelated families with different rare, damaging MYH6 variants.
Stage 1: Pedigree Analysis of Family F MYH6-R443P
In family F MYH6-R443P (Fig. 2) four members with LVOTO were identified. The father (III.1) had CoA, and two children with LVOTO, one of whom is an HLHS proband (IV.3) and the other (IV.1), had double outlet right ventricle with unbalanced atrioventricular canal and hypoplastic left ventricle. A deceased distant relative had a history of HLHS (II:4). One relative had an unrelated heart defect, perimembranous ventricular septal defect (IV:4). Identification and filtering of variants in affected siblings (IV:1 and IV:3) and great aunt (II:4), followed by subtracting variants identified in the unaffected mother (III.2), identified 20 candidate genes (See supplemental methods, next-generation sequencing, and Supplemental Table S1). Among these, MYH6 was the only gene with a known cardiac association that is highly expressed in the heart (Supplemental Table S1). This established MYH6 as a candidate gene for this family. A novel R443P mutation in the head/motor domain of MYH6 was revealed.
Stage 2: Case-control Association Testing for Rare, Damaging MYH6 Variants in HLHS
To determine MYH6 association with HLHS, a case-control analysis for rare, damaging MYH6 variants was performed using a cohort of 190 unrelated HLHS subjects, all of whom had undergone either WES or WGS, with the Thousand Genomes Phase1v3 database serving as a control cohort (See supplemental methods, next-generation sequencing). This revealed the presence of 21 (19 distinct) MYH6 variants (Table 1, Fig. 2) in 20 (10.5%) HLHS subjects, compared with the presence of rare, damaging MYH6 variants in only 2.9% of control subjects (n = 1,063 unrelated individuals). The null hypothesis that the observed >360% enrichment was due to chance was rejected (Fisher's exact test for difference in proportions P < 1 × 10−5, Supplemental Table S1). We further validated this finding by performing the same test using a larger database, the Exome Variant Server, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Gene Ontology Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), Seattle, WA (URL: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/, date accessed February, 2016) wherein MYH6 was enriched (P < 5 × 10−3) (supplemental methods, Supplemental Table S1).
Table 1.
List of MYH6 variants
Coordinate (b37)
R/A
Domain
Exon (of 39)
Variant Name
Subject
PP2
SIFT
Inherit
Pop Freq
23874837
A/T
head
4
Y115N
R0016
0.999
0
de novo
novel
23872623
C/A
head
10
Q277H
R0735
0.132
0
Mat
0.03%
23870180
C/T
head
13
D383N
07_155
0.986
0
NonPat
novel
23870173
G/A
head
13
S385L
10_121
0.157
0.04
Mat
novel
23870021
T/C
head
13
M436V
10_121
0.996
0.12
NonMat
novel
23869999
C/G
head
13
R443P
07_067
1
0
Pat
novel
23868064
T/G
head
15
D588A
11_099
1
0.26
Mat
0.17%
23865538
G/A
neck
20
R795W
R0023
0.998
0
Mat
0.01%
23863413
CTT/-
tail
21
K850-
07_074
NA
NA
NA
novel
23862995
G/A
tail
22
A936V
R0121
0.796
0.1
Pat
0.02%
23862912
C/A
tail
22
A964S
10_249
0.997
0.07
NA
0.22%
23862912
C/A
tail
22
A964S
09_299
0.997
0.07
NA
0.22%
23859545
C/T
tail
26
R1151Q
07_082
0.937
0.04
NA
novel
23858686
G/A
tail
28
A1298V
09_103
0.65
0.11
NA
0.01%
23858106
G/A
tail
29
T1379M
09_152
0.995
0.06
NA
0.06%
23858106
G/A
tail
29
T1379M
12_093
0.992
0.06
NA
0.06%
23857394
G/T
tail
30
A1443D
11_003
0.885
0.03
NA
novel
23856983
T/A
tail
31
E1503V
12_234
1
0.03
Mat
novel
23855732
C/T
tail
33
E1584K
09_204
0.889
0
Mat
novel
23854153
C/A
tail
35
E1754X
07_026
NA
NA
NA
0.01%
23853696
T/C
tail
36
K1840R
R0300
0.999
0.11
NA
0.02%
Coordinate, start position GRCh37; R, reference allele; A, alternative allele, Subject, identification number; PP2, PolyPhen score; NA, not available; Inherit, inheritance pattern; Mat, maternal; NonMat, nonmaternal; Pat, paternal; NonPat, nonpaternal; Pop Freq, population frequency from ESP 6500 (URL: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/, accessed November 2015).
List of MYH6 variantsCoordinate, start position GRCh37; R, reference allele; A, alternative allele, Subject, identification number; PP2, PolyPhen score; NA, not available; Inherit, inheritance pattern; Mat, maternal; NonMat, nonmaternal; Pat, paternal; NonPat, nonpaternal; Pop Freq, population frequency from ESP 6500 (URL: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/, accessed November 2015).All MYH6 variants in HLHS subjects were confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing, or by RNA-Seq analysis, using a different tissue source from the same individual. Among the 19 distinct MYH6 variants, 10 were novel, one was a three-base pair in-frame deletion, and one was a nonsense mutation. One subject demonstrated paternal inheritance (F MYH6-R443P) wherein the father was also affected with CHD, and six subjects demonstrated maternal inheritance patterns (wherein one mother had BAV and five mothers were asymptomatic, although cardiac anatomy was unconfirmed). In addition, one subject exhibited a de novo variant and another demonstrated compound heterozygous inheritance wherein one variant was clearly inherited from the mother (paternal DNA unavailable). Nearly all (19/20) of the HLHS subjects were heterozygous carriers, supporting a previous study suggesting a dominant but incompletely penetrant pattern of inherited atrial septal defects (33). These data confirmed the association (27) of rare, damaging MYH6 variants with HLHS. Odds ratio was calculated as 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.3 to 7.4; P < 1 × 10−4).
Stage 3: Transplant-free Survival Analysis
Follow-up data from 72 HLHS subjects (≥6 yr of age) showed that MYH6 variant carriers (n = 10) had significantly lower cardiac transplant-free survival than wild-type subjects (n = 62) (P < 1 × 10−2) (Fig. 3). These data indicate that MYH6 variants demonstrate a long-term consequence in HLHS pathogenicity (27).
Fig. 3.
Transplant-free survival analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curve constructed from 72 HLHS subjects. Among these, 10 subjects had a rare MYH6 variant (MUT), compared with 62 WT subjects. The Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon) statistic evaluated significance, resulting in rejection of the null hypothesis that these curves are equivalent (P = 6 × 10−3).
Transplant-free survival analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curve constructed from 72 HLHS subjects. Among these, 10 subjects had a rare MYH6 variant (MUT), compared with 62 WT subjects. The Breslow (generalized Wilcoxon) statistic evaluated significance, resulting in rejection of the null hypothesis that these curves are equivalent (P = 6 × 10−3).
Stage 4: Increased MYH7 Expression in HLHS Tissues with MYH6 Variants
RNA-Seq assessed whether MYH6 variants affected gene expression in cardiac tissue from HLHS subjects. Transcriptomes were compared in discarded atrial septal tissue from 10 HLHS subjects, half of whom had an MYH6 variant, as well as from discarded right ventricular tissue of six HLHS subjects, half of whom also had an MYH6 variant. Tissues were matched pair-wise according to age, and when possible, as well as to sex and aortic and mitral valve anatomy (Fig. 4, Supplemental Table S2). Although no significant change in MYH6 transcript levels was detected in HLHS tissues containing MYH6 variants, 22 other genes were differentially expressed (Supplemental Fig. S1, Supplemental Table S3). Among these cardiac troponin T2 (TNNT2), myosin heavy chain 7 (MYH7), skeletal muscle alpha actin 1 (ACTA1), and myosin light chain 2 (MYL2) (all which are components of the contractile apparatus), were significantly upregulated (>3- to 12-fold, P ≤ 5 × 10−3). MYH7, the major myosin in human ventricle and the closest paralog of MYH6, was increased by almost 350% relative to tissues in HLHS subjects containing wild-type MYH6 (Fig. 4A, Supplemental Table S3; P < 1 × 10−3). Upregulation of MYH7 expression from the five pairs of atrial samples was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (supplemental methods, ). To assess whether increased MYH7 expression extended to the protein level, levels of β-MHC protein in the same pair-matched atrial septal and right ventricular discards were compared by Western blotting; this revealed that β-MHC was substantially increased in HLHS subjects with MYH6 variants (generalized linear model/ANOVA, +62%, ± 0.15 SE, P < 1 × 10−3) (Fig. 4, Supplemental Table S4).
Fig. 4.
Pairwise analysis of gene expression of MYH7 in HLHS patients with and without MYH6 variants. A: gray-shaded and black bars denote HLHS patients with and without MYH6 variants, respectively. The annotation within each gray bar indicates the amino acid change resultant from each MYH6 mutation. Paired bars on the left and right side of the figure, respectively, indicate ventricular and atrial septal samples. Subject information is available in Supplemental Table S2. Sample number, sex status (male or female), and age (m, month; d, day; y, year) are denoted in the x-axis label. MYH7 expression is significantly increased (346%) in HLHS patients with an MYH6 mutation (P < 1 × 10−3, Supplemental Table S3). TPM, transcripts per million. B: Western blot showing increased β-MHC protein in the right ventricle and atrial septum of HLHS patients with an MYH6 variant. B, top: representative Western blot selected from 5 technical replicates of 4 pairs of patient samples; pairings are denoted on the x-axis. The entire immunoblot is shown in Supplemental Fig. S2. B, bottom: densitometric analysis of β-MHC levels normalized to GAPDH, reflecting the average of 5 replicate determinations performed on the 4 tissue pairs shown in B, top. Statistical analysis of the aggregate data representing the 4 pairs was statistically significant P < 1 × 10−3, generalized linear model/ANOVA, 62%, ± 0.15 SE.
Pairwise analysis of gene expression of MYH7 in HLHS patients with and without MYH6 variants. A: gray-shaded and black bars denote HLHS patients with and without MYH6 variants, respectively. The annotation within each gray bar indicates the amino acid change resultant from each MYH6 mutation. Paired bars on the left and right side of the figure, respectively, indicate ventricular and atrial septal samples. Subject information is available in Supplemental Table S2. Sample number, sex status (male or female), and age (m, month; d, day; y, year) are denoted in the x-axis label. MYH7 expression is significantly increased (346%) in HLHS patients with an MYH6 mutation (P < 1 × 10−3, Supplemental Table S3). TPM, transcripts per million. B: Western blot showing increased β-MHC protein in the right ventricle and atrial septum of HLHS patients with an MYH6 variant. B, top: representative Western blot selected from 5 technical replicates of 4 pairs of patient samples; pairings are denoted on the x-axis. The entire immunoblot is shown in Supplemental Fig. S2. B, bottom: densitometric analysis of β-MHC levels normalized to GAPDH, reflecting the average of 5 replicate determinations performed on the 4 tissue pairs shown in B, top. Statistical analysis of the aggregate data representing the 4 pairs was statistically significant P < 1 × 10−3, generalized linear model/ANOVA, 62%, ± 0.15 SE.
Stage 5: Increased MYH7 Expression and Defective Differentiation in iPSC-derived Cardiomyocytes from HLHS Subjects with MYH6 Variants
To determine whether increased MYH7 expression is phenocopied in cardiomyocytes derived from iPSCs, iPSC lines were generated from dermal fibroblasts of family F MYH6-R443P. Following cellular expansion and verification of pluripotency, iPSCs representing the proband and an unaffected parent were induced to undergo cardiomyogenic differentiation as recently described (21) (depicted in Fig. 5), during which cultures of cardiomyogenic cells were removed for RNA-Seq determinations on the differentiation days shown in Fig. 5. As anticipated (21), MYH7 transcription was first detected on differentiation day 5, at which stage similar levels of MYH7 transcripts were seen in cardiomyocytes representing the proband and its unaffected parent. On day 8, although substantial increases in MYH7 expression were seen in cardiomyocytes from both individuals, the level of expression in proband cardiomyocytes was ∼2.5-fold greater than that observed in myocytes from the unaffected parent. Increased MYH7 expression in proband cardiomyocytes was confirmed by quantitative PCR performed on two independent iPSC lines from each subject (Fig. 5, left). In addition, the efficiency of cardiomyogenic differentiation was significantly reduced in the HLHS proband's cardiomyocytes, as determined by α-MHC immunostaining (Fig. 5) and flow cytometry assessments of percent cTnT-positive cells (Fig. 5). All of these findings were recapitulated in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from an unrelated HLHS family that contained a different MYH6 mutation, which was identified in the CHD Tissue Bank (F MYH6-D588A: Fig. 5, right, and Supplemental Fig. S4). Finally, we evaluated sarcomere structure in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes at later stages of differentiation (days 62–68), observing that, compared with the unaffected parent, sarcomeres were substantially disorganized in both the affected parent and the proband of family F MYH6-R443P (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5.
Increased MYH7 expression in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from probands in 2 HLHS families. A: scheme for differentiating cardiomyocytes with small molecule Gsk3 inhibitor (CHIR99021) and wnt inhibitor (IWP). B: immunostaining of α-MHC at day 10 showing defective cardiomyogenesis in iPSCs from the HLHS proband and affected parent (carrier father) of family F MYH6-R443P. C: flow cytometry of cells cultured in parallel with those in B, showing decreased percentages of cardiac troponin T (cTnT)-positive cells at day 10. Data were compiled from 3 iPSC lines derived from each individual. The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE. D: RNA-Seq showing MYH7 expression in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs) from family F MYH6-R443P at differentiation day 8. Proband bars represent the average of 2 cell lines; vertical lines = range. Unaffected parent bars represent values from single cell line. E, left: quantitative PCR showing increased MYH7 expression in the HLHS proband of family F MYH6-R443P. E, right: a similar result from iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes of a separate HLHS family (F MYH6-D588A). Bars represent the average of triplicate cultures evaluated in 2 independent iPSC lines (n = 6). The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE. Additional iPSC analysis from family F MYH6-D588A is shown in Supplemental Fig. S4.
Fig. 6.
Dysmorphic sarcomeres in CMs derived from iPSCs reprogrammed from the HLHS proband and its affected parent. A: α-actinin immunostaining of mass cultured CMs at differentiation day 65. B: comparative sarcomere organization in individual CMs isolated from the cultures shown in A and subcultured at low density. A minimum of 100 isolated CMs representing each individual were judged to contain dysmorphic sarcomere organization if most of the myocyte area displayed blurred staining in which sarcomeric ladders contained punctate or truncated deposits of α-actinin ladders, rather than the relatively crisp and elongated ladders with relatively wide Z-bands that characterize MYH6 cells. C: data were compiled from quadruplicate dishes representing each iPSC line (1 line from each parent; 2 lines from the proband) evaluated during a single determination. The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE.
Increased MYH7 expression in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from probands in 2 HLHS families. A: scheme for differentiating cardiomyocytes with small molecule Gsk3 inhibitor (CHIR99021) and wnt inhibitor (IWP). B: immunostaining of α-MHC at day 10 showing defective cardiomyogenesis in iPSCs from the HLHS proband and affected parent (carrier father) of family F MYH6-R443P. C: flow cytometry of cells cultured in parallel with those in B, showing decreased percentages of cardiac troponin T (cTnT)-positive cells at day 10. Data were compiled from 3 iPSC lines derived from each individual. The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE. D: RNA-Seq showing MYH7 expression in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs) from family F MYH6-R443P at differentiation day 8. Proband bars represent the average of 2 cell lines; vertical lines = range. Unaffected parent bars represent values from single cell line. E, left: quantitative PCR showing increased MYH7 expression in the HLHS proband of family F MYH6-R443P. E, right: a similar result from iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes of a separate HLHS family (F MYH6-D588A). Bars represent the average of triplicate cultures evaluated in 2 independent iPSC lines (n = 6). The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE. Additional iPSC analysis from family F MYH6-D588A is shown in Supplemental Fig. S4.
DISCUSSION
Among hypotheses explaining left ventricle hypoplasia in HLHS are that 1) reduced blood flow due to valvular atresia/stenosis alters ventricular preload with consequent dysmorphology (16) and that 2) defective expansion and/or differentiation of cardiomyocytes results in dysmorphology and dysfunction (8). While the results reported here can be reconciled with both hypotheses, our observations that iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes from the affected parent and proband of families that carry selected MYH6 variants undergo poor cardiomyocyte differentiation followed by poor sarcomere organization suggest that HLHS etiology is cardiomyocyte autonomous (Fig. 6). In either event, the data demonstrate that rare MYH6 variants, which are present in 10.5% of HLHS cases, have pathogenic consequences.Dysmorphic sarcomeres in CMs derived from iPSCs reprogrammed from the HLHS proband and its affected parent. A: α-actinin immunostaining of mass cultured CMs at differentiation day 65. B: comparative sarcomere organization in individual CMs isolated from the cultures shown in A and subcultured at low density. A minimum of 100 isolated CMs representing each individual were judged to contain dysmorphic sarcomere organization if most of the myocyte area displayed blurred staining in which sarcomeric ladders contained punctate or truncated deposits of α-actinin ladders, rather than the relatively crisp and elongated ladders with relatively wide Z-bands that characterize MYH6 cells. C: data were compiled from quadruplicate dishes representing each iPSC line (1 line from each parent; 2 lines from the proband) evaluated during a single determination. The P values were calculated by Student's t-test (2-tailed, equal variance); vertical lines = ± SE.We unexpectedly found that expression of a subset of cardiac contractility genes was increased in the presence of MYH6 variants. This possibly represents an adaptive mechanism, similar but not identical to that which occurs in the failing heart muscle (35). Most remarkably, the presence of MYH6 variants is accompanied by strongly increased expression of MYH7, in both atrial and ventricular tissues of HLHS subjects (Fig. 4). In addition to confirming the increased expression of MYH7 in HLHS tissues containing MYH6 variants (Fig. 4, A and B), the findings in Fig. 5, D and E, that increased MYH7 expression is phenocopied in cardiomyocytes from iPSCs in two separate families, indicate that HLHS etiology can be investigated at the earliest stages of cardiomyogenesis using this in vitro disease model.Altered contractility has been proposed as an etiologic mechanism in CHD (18). The increase in MYH7, which is considered as the “slow twitch isoform,” may adaptively reduce energy requirements in the hypoplastic myocardium because β-MHC (MYH7) has relatively low ATPase activity (31). It follows that maximal shortening velocity and peak power would be altered, resulting in hypocontractility. Because MYH6 is the predominant atrial isoform, it is plausible that atrial hypocontractility due to mutated MYH6 impedes the flow of fetal blood from the right atrium to the left atrium and through the mitral valve, resulting in limited filling of the left ventricle. This scenario, which is consistent with both the cardiomyocyte-autonomous and flow hypotheses, may explain underdevelopment of the mitral valve, left ventricle, and aortic arch, all of which are hallmarks of HLHS. Indeed, previous studies have shown that mutation of myh6 in zebrafish and the subsequent disruption of atrial function have a profound effect on ventricular morphogenesis and atrioventricular valve formation (2, 19).Although examination of the effect of MYH6 variants on contractile power was beyond the scope of this study, it is noteworthy that variants were observed across all functional domains of α-MHC. In particular, seven mutations were noted in the head/motor domain, including four within an exon 13 “hotspot” that includes R443P (Fig. 3). Alterations in the α-MHC head/motor region have been shown to impact stiffness that results in diastolic dysfunction (20). Also, because the head/motor domain contains binding sites for ATP and actin, variants may induce conformational changes that compromise actin-myosin association. Although only one mutation was found in the neck region, 11 were noted in the coiled-coil/tail region, among which half were located in the domain that interfaces with myosin light chain; in this regard it may be relevant that MYL2, which is required for cardiomyocyte differentiation in the murine heart (5), like MYH7, also exhibits increased expression in HLHS patients who carry MYH6 variants (Fig. 4 and Supplemental Table S3). It is also plausible that alterations in the α-MHC tail cause reduced power, as mutations in the tail of homolog β-MHC reportedly distort helicity of the coiled-coil region (42).Previous studies have found that failing hearts, such as those from cardiomyopathypatients, exhibit decreased levels of MYH6 mRNA (25, 26, 30), with concomitantly increased expression of MYH7 (34). It is well known that treatment of cardiomyopathy with β-blockers improves myocardial function and increases survival, an effect that likely results from decreased adrenergic stimulation (9). However, β-blockers also distort the expression of myocardial genes, most remarkably depressing levels of β-MHC concomitant with the restoration of fast-contracting α-MHC fibers (22), resulting in improved cardiac function (25). While acknowledging the complexity of drug-gene interactions, these findings, when superimposed on the results reported here, invite speculation that β-blocker therapy, with or without recently developed cardiac myosin activation therapies (28), may be useful for treating HLHS subjects who carry pathogenic MYH6 variants. Ongoing work using iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes will determine the responsiveness of myocytes containing pathogenic MYH6 variants to pharmaceutical agents including β-blockers and myosin activation drugs.
Limitations
In case-control association analyses, it is desirable to select appropriate control cohorts including those that share ethnic, sex, and age composition. In this study, the publicly available Thousand Genomes Phase 1v3 database was used as a control cohort against whole exomes and genomes of HLHS patients. The controls often had low read-depth and were not imputed; therefore, rare variants may be underrepresented. However, if missed variants exist uniformly across the control genomes, the corresponding decrease in signal-to-noise would not impact our finding that MYH6 was among the most overrepresented of the 20 candidate genes identified through pedigree analysis. We mitigate genome-wide false positives by only investigating the 20 candidate genes from the pedigree analysis and by replicating enrichment against the larger exome database, NHLBI's ESP.
GRANTS
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-089471 (J. W. Lough) and from the Todd and Karen Wanek Family program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome (A. Tomita-Mitchell, J. W. Lough, M. E. Mitchell). In addition, this publication is funded in part by the Research and Education Program Fund, a component of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment at the Medical College of Wisconsin Grant #5520361 (A. Tomita-Mitchell and J. W. Lough), the Wolfe Family Foundation, the Little Hearts for Life Foundation, the Medical College of Wisconsin's Department of Surgery, and the CRI.
DISCLOSURES
A. Tomita-Mitchell and M. E. Mitchell are cofounders of Ariosa Diagnostics (San Jose, CA), a prenatal diagnostics biotechnology company that was acquired by Roche in 2015. A. Tomita-Mitchell and M. E. Mitchell are cofounders of TAI Diagnostics (Milwaukee, WI), a biotechnology company involved in transplant diagnostics, and members of its scientific advisory board.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.T.-M., K.D.S., M.-S.K., P.M.H., H.L.L., M.H., and J.W.L. analyzed data; A.T.-M., K.D.S., D.K.M., M.-S.K., P.M.S., and J.W.L. interpreted results of experiments; A.T.-M., K.D.S., D.K.M., M.-S.K., P.M.H., P.M.S., and J.W.L. prepared figures; A.T.-M. and M.H. drafted manuscript; A.T.-M., K.D.S., D.K.M., M.-S.K., P.M.H., H.L.L., M.A.G., M.H., A.N.P., J.S.T., D.W.B., and J.W.L. edited and revised manuscript; A.T.-M., K.D.S., D.K.M., M.-S.K., A.N.P., J.S.T., D.W.B., J.W.L., and M.E.M. approved final version of manuscript; K.D.S., D.K.M., M.-S.K., P.M.H., H.L.L., M.A.G., M.H., and J.S.T. performed experiments.
Authors: Jay R Hove; Reinhard W Köster; Arian S Forouhar; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Scott E Fraser; Morteza Gharib Journal: Nature Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Donna K Mahnke; Craig A Struble; Maureen E Tuffnell; Karl D Stamm; Mats Hidestrand; Susan E Harris; Mary A Goetsch; Pippa M Simpson; David P Bick; Ulrich Broeckel; Andrew N Pelech; James S Tweddell; Michael E Mitchell Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Jeanne L Theis; Michael T Zimmermann; Jared M Evans; Bruce W Eckloff; Eric D Wieben; Muhammad Y Qureshi; Patrick W O'Leary; Timothy M Olson Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2015-06-17
Authors: Cammon B Arrington; Steven B Bleyl; Norisada Matsunami; Gabriel D Bonnell; Brith E M Otterud; Douglas C Nielsen; Jeffrey Stevens; Shawn Levy; Mark F Leppert; Neil E Bowles Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2012-02-15
Authors: Louise V Wain; Germaine C Verwoert; Paul F O'Reilly; Gang Shi; Toby Johnson; Andrew D Johnson; Murielle Bochud; Kenneth M Rice; Peter Henneman; Albert V Smith; Georg B Ehret; Najaf Amin; Martin G Larson; Vincent Mooser; David Hadley; Marcus Dörr; Joshua C Bis; Thor Aspelund; Tõnu Esko; A Cecile J W Janssens; Jing Hua Zhao; Simon Heath; Maris Laan; Jingyuan Fu; Giorgio Pistis; Jian'an Luan; Pankaj Arora; Gavin Lucas; Nicola Pirastu; Irene Pichler; Anne U Jackson; Rebecca J Webster; Feng Zhang; John F Peden; Helena Schmidt; Toshiko Tanaka; Harry Campbell; Wilmar Igl; Yuri Milaneschi; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Veronique Vitart; Daniel I Chasman; Stella Trompet; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; John C Chambers; Xiuqing Guo; Terho Lehtimäki; Brigitte Kühnel; Lorna M Lopez; Ozren Polašek; Mladen Boban; Christopher P Nelson; Alanna C Morrison; Vasyl Pihur; Santhi K Ganesh; Albert Hofman; Suman Kundu; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Fernando Rivadeneira; Eric J G Sijbrands; Andre G Uitterlinden; Shih-Jen Hwang; Ramachandran S Vasan; Thomas J Wang; Sven Bergmann; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Jaana Laitinen; Anneli Pouta; Paavo Zitting; Wendy L McArdle; Heyo K Kroemer; Uwe Völker; Henry Völzke; Nicole L Glazer; Kent D Taylor; Tamara B Harris; Helene Alavere; Toomas Haller; Aime Keis; Mari-Liis Tammesoo; Yurii Aulchenko; Inês Barroso; Kay-Tee Khaw; Pilar Galan; Serge Hercberg; Mark Lathrop; Susana Eyheramendy; Elin Org; Siim Sõber; Xiaowen Lu; Ilja M Nolte; Brenda W Penninx; Tanguy Corre; Corrado Masciullo; Cinzia Sala; Leif Groop; Benjamin F Voight; Olle Melander; Christopher J O'Donnell; Veikko Salomaa; Adamo Pio d'Adamo; Antonella Fabretto; Flavio Faletra; Sheila Ulivi; Fabiola M Del Greco; Maurizio Facheris; Francis S Collins; Richard N Bergman; John P Beilby; Joseph Hung; A William Musk; Massimo Mangino; So-Youn Shin; Nicole Soranzo; Hugh Watkins; Anuj Goel; Anders Hamsten; Pierre Gider; Marisa Loitfelder; Marion Zeginigg; Dena Hernandez; Samer S Najjar; Pau Navarro; Sarah H Wild; Anna Maria Corsi; Andrew Singleton; Eco J C de Geus; Gonneke Willemsen; Alex N Parker; Lynda M Rose; Brendan Buckley; David Stott; Marco Orru; Manuela Uda; Melanie M van der Klauw; Weihua Zhang; Xinzhong Li; James Scott; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Gregory L Burke; Mika Kähönen; Jorma Viikari; Angela Döring; Thomas Meitinger; Gail Davies; John M Starr; Valur Emilsson; Andrew Plump; Jan H Lindeman; Peter A C 't Hoen; Inke R König; Janine F Felix; Robert Clarke; Jemma C Hopewell; Halit Ongen; Monique Breteler; Stéphanie Debette; Anita L Destefano; Myriam Fornage; Gary F Mitchell; Nicholas L Smith; Hilma Holm; Kari Stefansson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Nilesh J Samani; Michael Preuss; Igor Rudan; Caroline Hayward; Ian J Deary; H-Erich Wichmann; Olli T Raitakari; Walter Palmas; Jaspal S Kooner; Ronald P Stolk; J Wouter Jukema; Alan F Wright; Dorret I Boomsma; Stefania Bandinelli; Ulf B Gyllensten; James F Wilson; Luigi Ferrucci; Reinhold Schmidt; Martin Farrall; Tim D Spector; Lyle J Palmer; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Arne Pfeufer; Paolo Gasparini; David Siscovick; David Altshuler; Ruth J F Loos; Daniela Toniolo; Harold Snieder; Christian Gieger; Pierre Meneton; Nicholas J Wareham; Ben A Oostra; Andres Metspalu; Lenore Launer; Rainer Rettig; David P Strachan; Jacques S Beckmann; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Jeanette Erdmann; Ko Willems van Dijk; Eric Boerwinkle; Michael Boehnke; Paul M Ridker; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Aravinda Chakravarti; Goncalo R Abecasis; Vilmundur Gudnason; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Daniel Levy; Patricia B Munroe; Bruce M Psaty; Mark J Caulfield; Dabeeru C Rao; Martin D Tobin; Paul Elliott; Cornelia M van Duijn Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-09-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Maximilian G Posch; Stephan Waldmuller; Melanie Müller; Thomas Scheffold; David Fournier; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Bernard De Geeter; Sophie Guillaumont; Claire Dauphin; Dany Yousseff; Katharina R Schmitt; Andreas Perrot; Felix Berger; Roland Hetzer; Patrice Bouvagnet; Cemil Özcelik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Min-Su Kim; Audrey Horst; Steven Blinka; Karl Stamm; Donna Mahnke; James Schuman; Rebekah Gundry; Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; John Lough Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alain van Mil; Geerthe Margriet Balk; Klaus Neef; Jan Willem Buikema; Folkert W Asselbergs; Sean M Wu; Pieter A Doevendans; Joost P G Sluijter Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: John F LaDisa; Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Karl Stamm; Kathleen Bazan; Donna K Mahnke; Mary A Goetsch; Brandon J Wegter; Jesse W Gerringer; Kathryn Repp; Oleg Palygin; Adrian P Zietara; Mary M Krolikowski; Thomas J Eddinger; Abdel A Alli; Michael E Mitchell Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 4.297
Authors: Chunbo Yang; Yaobo Xu; Min Yu; David Lee; Sameer Alharti; Nicola Hellen; Noor Ahmad Shaik; Babajan Banaganapalli; Hussein Sheikh Ali Mohamoud; Ramu Elango; Stefan Przyborski; Gennadiy Tenin; Simon Williams; John O'Sullivan; Osman O Al-Radi; Jameel Atta; Sian E Harding; Bernard Keavney; Majlinda Lako; Lyle Armstrong Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Thorsteinn Bjornsson; Rosa B Thorolfsdottir; Gardar Sveinbjornsson; Patrick Sulem; Gudmundur L Norddahl; Anna Helgadottir; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Audur Magnusdottir; Ragnar Danielsen; Emil L Sigurdsson; Berglind Adalsteinsdottir; Sverrir I Gunnarsson; Ingileif Jonsdottir; David O Arnar; Hrodmar Helgason; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Hilma Holm; Kari Stefansson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 29.983