Literature DB >> 27789718

Imaging the Cytokine Receptor CXCR4 in Atherosclerotic Plaques with the Radiotracer 68Ga-Pentixafor for PET.

Fabien Hyafil1,2, Jaroslav Pelisek3, Iina Laitinen4, Margret Schottelius5, Miriam Mohring4, Yvonne Döring6, Emiel P C van der Vorst6, Michael Kallmayer3, Katja Steiger7, Andreas Poschenrieder5, Johannes Notni5, Johannes Fischer8, Christine Baumgartner8, Christoph Rischpler4,2,3,5,6,7,8,9, Stephan G Nekolla4,2,3,5,6,7,8,9, Christian Weber6,7,8,9,10, Hans-Henning Eckstein3, Hans-Jürgen Wester5, Markus Schwaiger4,2,3,5,6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

68Ga-pentixafor is a radiotracer for PET that binds with nanomolar affinity to CXCR4. The CXCR4 receptor is expressed at the surface of inflammatory cells. The objective of the study was to analyze the ability of radiolabeled pentixafor to detect CXCR4 expression on inflammatory cells present in atherosclerotic plaques of an experimental rabbit model.
Methods: Atherosclerotic plaques were induced by endothelial abrasion of the right carotid artery and abdominal aorta of 7 rabbits fed an atherogenic diet. Five noninjured rabbits fed a chow diet were used as controls. Rabbits were imaged on a PET/MR system after injection of 68Ga-pentixafor (15 MBq/kg). Vascular signal was quantified as tissue-to-background ratio (TBR). Biodistribution and autoradiographic studies were performed 1 h after injection of 125I-pentixafor (7.5 MBq/kg). In addition, blocking studies were performed in 2 atherosclerotic rabbits with preinjection of the CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100. Tracer uptake was quantified on arterial cryosections using autoradiography and compared with CXCR4 and RAM-11 (macrophage) expression on adjacent histologic sections.
Results: One hour after injection of 68Ga-pentixafor, strong signals were detected in vivo with PET/MR imaging in atherosclerotic plaques of the abdominal aorta and right carotid artery as compared with normal control arteries (mean TBR = 1.95 ± 0.51 vs. 1.22 ± 0.25 and mean TBR = 1.24 ± 0.38 vs. 0.96 ± 0.37, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Blocking studies with preinjection of a CXCR4 inhibitor reduced 125I-pentixafor uptake in atherosclerotic plaques by approximately 40%. 125I-pentixafor uptake in the vessel wall on autoradiographies was located in macrophage-rich regions of atherosclerotic plaques and correlated with the intensity of CXCR4 expression on corresponding cryosections (r2 = 0.61; P < 0.05).
Conclusion: 68Ga-pentixafor allows for the noninvasive detection of CXCR4 expression in the vessel wall with PET and emerges as a potential alternative to 18F-FDG for the assessment of macrophage infiltration in atherosclerotic plaques.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CXCR4; PET; atherosclerosis; inflammation; macrophages; radiotracer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27789718     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  37 in total

Review 1.  Frontiers in positron emission tomography imaging of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  Mark G MacAskill; David E Newby; Adriana A S Tavares
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 2.  Atherosclerosis Immunoimaging by Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Carlos Pérez-Medina; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Selection of abstracts from the scientific sessions of The Society Of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging annual meeting Anaheim CA.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Martin Lyngby Lassen; Joanna Liang; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Imaging the event-prone coronary artery plaque.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  [Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in rheumatology].

Authors:  T Derlin
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Current and novel radiopharmaceuticals for imaging cardiovascular inflammation.

Authors:  Gyu S Heo; Deborah Sultan; Yongjian Liu
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.346

7.  Imaging inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques: Just make it easy!

Authors:  Fabien Hyafil; Jonathan Vigne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Unraveling Vascular Inflammation: From Immunology to Imaging.

Authors:  Heather L Teague; Mark A Ahlman; Abass Alavi; Denisa D Wagner; Andrew H Lichtman; Matthias Nahrendorf; Filip K Swirski; Frank Nestle; Joel M Gelfand; Mariana J Kaplan; Steven Grinspoon; Paul M Ridker; David E Newby; Ahmed Tawakol; Zahi A Fayad; Nehal N Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Current and Emerging Preclinical Approaches for Imaging-Based Characterization of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jonathan Vigne; James Thackeray; Jeroen Essers; Marcus Makowski; Zoreh Varasteh; Adelina Curaj; Angelos Karlas; Emmanuel Canet-Soulas; Willem Mulder; Fabian Kiessling; Michael Schäfers; René Botnar; Moritz Wildgruber; Fabien Hyafil
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  Integrated cardiovascular assessment of atherosclerosis using PET/MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas R Evans; Jason M Tarkin; Elizabeth Pv Le; Rouchelle S Sriranjan; Andrej Corovic; Elizabeth A Warburton; James Hf Rudd
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.