S Vaid1, A Chandorkar2, A Atre2, D Shah2, N Vaid3. 1. Head and Neck Imaging Division, Star Imaging and Research Center, Connaught Place, Bund Garden Road, Pune 411001, India. Electronic address: svaidhn@gmail.com. 2. Head and Neck Imaging Division, Star Imaging and Research Center, Connaught Place, Bund Garden Road, Pune 411001, India. 3. Dept of Otorhinolaryngology, K. E. M. Hospital, Rastapeth, Pune 411011, India.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating post-treatment changes from tumour recurrence in head and neck cancers and to establish a threshold apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to differentiate the two conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 80 treated head and neck cancer patients. The patient cohort consisted of a wide spectrum of head and neck sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, and infra-temporal fossa. Qualitative analysis of the diffusion images and quantitative analysis of the corresponding ADC maps was performed and the data were correlated with histopathological findings and clinical examinations. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of recurrent tumours in the present cohort was 0. 932±0.19×10-3 mm2/s and the mean ADC value of lesions representing post-treatment changes was 1.394±0.32×10-3 mm2/s. A threshold ADC value of 1.2×10-3mm2/s used to differentiate post-treatment changes from recurrent head and neck cancers showed the highest combined sensitivity of 90.13%, specificity of 82.5%, accuracy of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, and mean kappa measurement of agreement of 72.8. CONCLUSION: Combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of DWI is a useful non-invasive technique to differentiate recurrent head and neck malignancies from post-treatment changes using a threshold ADC value.
AIM: To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating post-treatment changes from tumour recurrence in head and neck cancers and to establish a threshold apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to differentiate the two conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 80 treated head and neck cancerpatients. The patient cohort consisted of a wide spectrum of head and neck sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, and infra-temporal fossa. Qualitative analysis of the diffusion images and quantitative analysis of the corresponding ADC maps was performed and the data were correlated with histopathological findings and clinical examinations. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of recurrent tumours in the present cohort was 0. 932±0.19×10-3 mm2/s and the mean ADC value of lesions representing post-treatment changes was 1.394±0.32×10-3 mm2/s. A threshold ADC value of 1.2×10-3mm2/s used to differentiate post-treatment changes from recurrent head and neck cancers showed the highest combined sensitivity of 90.13%, specificity of 82.5%, accuracy of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, and mean kappa measurement of agreement of 72.8. CONCLUSION: Combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of DWI is a useful non-invasive technique to differentiate recurrent head and neck malignancies from post-treatment changes using a threshold ADC value.
Authors: Marjolein Je Greuter; Charlotte S Schouten; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Emile Fi Comans; Otto S Hoekstra; Remco de Bree; Veerle Mh Coupé Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Valentina D A Corino; Marco Bologna; Giuseppina Calareso; Carlo Resteghini; Silvana Sdao; Ester Orlandi; Lisa Licitra; Luca Mainardi; Paolo Bossi Journal: J Imaging Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Egon Burian; Benjamin Palla; Nicholas Callahan; Thomas Pyka; Constantin Wolff; Claudio E von Schacky; Annabelle Schmid; Matthias F Froelich; Johannes Rübenthaler; Marcus R Makowski; Felix G Gassert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 10.057