Literature DB >> 27788949

Is There a Role for Pelvic Irradiation in Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma? Update of the Long-Term Survival Results of the GETUG-01 Randomized Study.

Pascal Pommier1, Sylvie Chabaud2, Jean-Leon Lagrange3, Pierre Richaud4, Elisabeth Le Prise5, Jean-Philippe Wagner6, David Azria7, Veronique Beckendorf8, Jean-Philippe Suchaud9, Valerie Bernier10, David Perol2, Christian Carrie11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term results of the French Genitourinary Study Group (GETUG)-01 study in terms of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) and assess the potential interaction between hormonotherapy and pelvic nodes irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1998 and June 2004, 446 patients with T1b-T3, N0pNx, M0 prostate carcinoma were randomly assigned to either pelvic nodes and prostate or prostate-only radiation therapy. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: "low risk" (T1-T2 and Gleason score 6 and prostate-specific antigen <3× the upper normal limit of the laboratory) (92 patients) versus "high risk" (T3 or Gleason score >6 or prostate-specific antigen >3× the upper normal limit of the laboratory). Short-term 6-month neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal therapy was allowed only for high-risk patients. Radiation therapy was delivered with a 3-dimensional conformal technique, using a 4-field technique for the pelvic volume (46 Gy). The total dose recommended to the prostate moved from 66 Gy to 70 Gy during the course of the study. Criteria for EFS included biologic prostate-specific antigen recurrences and/or a local or metastatic progression.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 11.4 years, the 10-year OS and EFS were similar in the 2 treatment arms. A higher but nonsignificant EFS was observed in the low-risk subgroup in favor of pelvic nodes radiation therapy (77.2% vs 62.5%; P=.18). A post hoc subgroup analysis showed a significant benefit of pelvic irradiation when the risk of lymph node involvement was <15% (Roach formula). This benefit seemed to be limited to patients who did not receive hormonal therapy.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic nodes irradiation did not statistically improve EFS or OS in the whole population but may be beneficial in selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with exclusive radiation therapy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27788949     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  31 in total

1.  Long term results of the NRG/RTOG 9413: a key study but one of the most confusing study in prostate cancer radiotherapy!

Authors:  Pascal Pommier
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

2.  Salvage radiotherapy for macroscopic local recurrences after radical prostatectomy : A national survey on patterns of practice.

Authors:  Alan Dal Pra; Cedric Panje; Thomas Zilli; Winfried Arnold; Kathrin Brouwer; Helena Garcia; Markus Glatzer; Silvia Gomez; Fernanda Herrera; Khanfir Kaouthar; Alexandros Papachristofilou; Gianfranco Pesce; Christiane Reuter; Hansjörg Vees; Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen; Daniel Engeler; Paul Martin Putora
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Sequence of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy field size in unfavourable, localised prostate cancer (NRG/RTOG 9413): long-term results of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Jennifer Moughan; Colleen A F Lawton; Adam P Dicker; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Elizabeth M Gore; Young Kwok; Michael J Seider; I-Chow Hsu; Alan C Hartford; Eric M Horwitz; Kosj Yamoah; Christopher U Jones; Jeff M Michalski; W Robert Lee; Thomas M Pisansky; Rachel Rabinovitch; Marvin Rotman; Rodger M Pryzant; Harold E Kim; Charles R Thomas; William U Shipley; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Toxicity of pelvic nodal radiation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  National practice patterns for lymph node irradiation in 197,000 men receiving external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adam B Weiner; Oliver S Ko; Alec Zhu; Daniel E Spratt; Jim C Hu; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Prostate-only Versus Whole-pelvis Radiation with or Without a Brachytherapy Boost for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Kiri A Sandler; Ryan R Cook; Jay P Ciezki; Ashley E Ross; Mark M Pomerantz; Paul L Nguyen; Talha Shaikh; Phuoc T Tran; Richard G Stock; Gregory S Merrick; David Jeffrey Demanes; Daniel E Spratt; Eyad I Abu-Isa; Trude B Wedde; Wolfgang Lilleby; Daniel J Krauss; Grace K Shaw; Ridwan Alam; Chandana A Reddy; Daniel Y Song; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson; Jeffrey J Tosoian; John V Hegde; Sun Mi Yoo; Ryan Fiano; Anthony V D'Amico; Nicholas G Nickols; William J Aronson; Ahmad Sadeghi; Stephen C Greco; Curtiland Deville; Todd McNutt; Theodore L DeWeese; Robert E Reiter; Jonathan W Said; Michael L Steinberg; Eric M Horwitz; Patrick A Kupelian; Christopher R King; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of 68Gallium-PSMA PET/MRI-based imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Thomas M Elliott; Andre Joshi; Elizabeth D Williams; Ian Vela
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Long-term safety of high-dose whole pelvic IMRT for high-risk localized prostate cancer through 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rihito Aizawa; Kiyonao Nakamura; Yoshiki Norihisa; Takashi Ogata; Takahiro Inoue; Toshinari Yamasaki; Takashi Kobayashi; Shusuke Akamatsu; Osamu Ogawa; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  [Radiation therapy of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  N-S Schmidt-Hegemann; M Li; C Eze; C Belka; U Ganswindt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.