Hermann M Behre1, Michael Zitzmann1, Richard A Anderson1, David J Handelsman1, Silvia W Lestari1, Robert I McLachlan1, M Cristina Meriggiola1, Man Mohan Misro1, Gabriela Noe1, Frederick C W Wu1, Mario Philip R Festin1, Ndema A Habib1, Kirsten M Vogelsong1, Marianne M Callahan1, Kim A Linton1, Doug S Colvard1. 1. Center for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology (H.M.B.), Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, D-06120 Halle, Germany; Center of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology (M.Z.), University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health (R.A.A.), Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Anzac Research Institute (D.J.H.), University of Sydney, and Andrology Department, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Biology (S.W.L.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Hudson Institute of Medical Research (R.I.M.), Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Clinic of Gynecology and Physiopathology of Reproduction (M.C.M.), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; National Institute of Health and Family Welfare (M.M.M.), New Delhi, India; Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva (G.N.), Santiago, Chile; Department of Endocrinology (F.C.W.W.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Reproductive Health and Research (M.R.P.F., N.A.H., K.M.V.), World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland; and CONRAD (M.M.C., K.A.L., D.S.C.), Arlington, Virginia 22209.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The development of a safe and effective reversible method of male contraception is still an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of suppression of spermatogenesis and contraceptive protection by coadministered im injections of progestogen and testosterone. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study. SETTING: Ten study centers. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy men, aged 18-45 years, and their 18- to 38-year-old female partners, both without known fertility problems. INTERVENTION: Intramuscular injections of 200-mg norethisterone enanthate combined with 1000-mg testosterone undecanoate, administered every 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Suppression of spermatogenesis by ejaculate analysis, contraceptive protection by pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Of the 320 participants, 95.9 of 100 continuing users (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.8-97.9) suppressed to a sperm concentration less than or equal to 1 million/mL within 24 weeks (Kaplan-Meier method). During the efficacy phase of up to 56 weeks, 4 pregnancies occurred among the partners of the 266 male participants, with the rate of 1.57 per 100 continuing users (95% CI, 0.59-4.14). The cumulative reversibility of suppression of spermatogenesis after 52 weeks of recovery was 94.8 per 100 continuing users (95% CI, 91.5-97.1). The most common adverse events were acne, injection site pain, increased libido, and mood disorders. Following the recommendation of an external safety review committee the recruitment and hormone injections were terminated early. CONCLUSIONS: The study regimen led to near-complete and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis. The contraceptive efficacy was relatively good compared with other reversible methods available for men. The frequencies of mild to moderate mood disorders were relatively high.
CONTEXT: The development of a safe and effective reversible method of male contraception is still an unmet need. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of suppression of spermatogenesis and contraceptive protection by coadministered im injections of progestogen and testosterone. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study. SETTING: Ten study centers. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy men, aged 18-45 years, and their 18- to 38-year-old female partners, both without known fertility problems. INTERVENTION: Intramuscular injections of 200-mg norethisterone enanthate combined with 1000-mg testosterone undecanoate, administered every 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Suppression of spermatogenesis by ejaculate analysis, contraceptive protection by pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Of the 320 participants, 95.9 of 100 continuing users (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.8-97.9) suppressed to a sperm concentration less than or equal to 1 million/mL within 24 weeks (Kaplan-Meier method). During the efficacy phase of up to 56 weeks, 4 pregnancies occurred among the partners of the 266 male participants, with the rate of 1.57 per 100 continuing users (95% CI, 0.59-4.14). The cumulative reversibility of suppression of spermatogenesis after 52 weeks of recovery was 94.8 per 100 continuing users (95% CI, 91.5-97.1). The most common adverse events were acne, injection site pain, increased libido, and mood disorders. Following the recommendation of an external safety review committee the recruitment and hormone injections were terminated early. CONCLUSIONS: The study regimen led to near-complete and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis. The contraceptive efficacy was relatively good compared with other reversible methods available for men. The frequencies of mild to moderate mood disorders were relatively high.
Authors: B D Anawalt; M Y Roth; J Ceponis; V Surampudi; J K Amory; R S Swerdloff; P Y Liu; C Dart; W J Bremner; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D L Blithe; S T Page; C Wang Journal: Andrology Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Fiona Yuen; Brian T Nguyen; Ronald S Swerdloff; Christina Wang Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 5.237
Authors: Fiona Yuen; Arthi Thirumalai; Cindy Pham; Ronald S Swerdloff; Bradley D Anawalt; Peter Y Liu; John K Amory; William J Bremner; Clint Dart; Hongsheng Wu; Laura Hull; Diana L Blithe; Jill Long; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Bhawana Shrestha; Alison Schaefer; Yong Zhu; Jamal Saada; Timothy M Jacobs; Elizabeth C Chavez; Stuart S Olmsted; Carlos A Cruz-Teran; Gabriela Baldeon Vaca; Kathleen Vincent; Thomas R Moench; Samuel K Lai Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 17.956