Kazuto Tajiri1, Kengo Kawai2, Toshiro Sugiyama2. 1. The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan. tajikazu@med.u-toyama.ac.jp. 2. The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estimation of liver stiffness is essential in the treatment of liver diseases. Various procedures alternative to liver biopsy have been developed, and transient elastography using shear wave is an established method for evaluating liver stiffness and has been shown to be a prognostic indicator. In contrast, strain elastography (SE) has been applied to evaluate liver stiffness, however the significance remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 598 patients who underwent SE to evaluate the ability of estimating liver stiffness and the prognosis. Elasticity index (EI) was evaluated as an indicator of liver stiffness in this study. RESULTS: EI was increased as histological fibrosis advanced. EI was significantly different between mild fibrosis (F0-2) and advanced fibrosis (F3, 4). In contrast, EI was similar among those with different activity scores. EI showed better diagnostic performance in estimating advanced fibrosis than other serological markers and good reproducibility. Furthermore, EI was shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with chronic liver diseases and also with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with advanced stage. CONCLUSIONS: SE could estimate advanced liver fibrosis without influence of liver inflammation unlike other serological liver fibrosis markers. SE might be a prognostic factor in chronic liver diseases and HCC.
BACKGROUND: Estimation of liver stiffness is essential in the treatment of liver diseases. Various procedures alternative to liver biopsy have been developed, and transient elastography using shear wave is an established method for evaluating liver stiffness and has been shown to be a prognostic indicator. In contrast, strain elastography (SE) has been applied to evaluate liver stiffness, however the significance remains uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 598 patients who underwent SE to evaluate the ability of estimating liver stiffness and the prognosis. Elasticity index (EI) was evaluated as an indicator of liver stiffness in this study. RESULTS: EI was increased as histological fibrosis advanced. EI was significantly different between mild fibrosis (F0-2) and advanced fibrosis (F3, 4). In contrast, EI was similar among those with different activity scores. EI showed better diagnostic performance in estimating advanced fibrosis than other serological markers and good reproducibility. Furthermore, EI was shown to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with chronic liver diseases and also with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with advanced stage. CONCLUSIONS: SE could estimate advanced liver fibrosis without influence of liver inflammation unlike other serological liver fibrosis markers. SE might be a prognostic factor in chronic liver diseases and HCC.
Authors: F Alvarez; P A Berg; F B Bianchi; L Bianchi; A K Burroughs; E L Cancado; R W Chapman; W G Cooksley; A J Czaja; V J Desmet; P T Donaldson; A L Eddleston; L Fainboim; J Heathcote; J C Homberg; J H Hoofnagle; S Kakumu; E L Krawitt; I R Mackay; R N MacSween; W C Maddrey; M P Manns; I G McFarlane; K H Meyer zum Büschenfelde; M Zeniya Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Giovanna Ferraioli; Carlo Filice; Laurent Castera; Byung Ihn Choi; Ioan Sporea; Stephanie R Wilson; David Cosgrove; Christoph F Dietrich; Dominique Amy; Jeffrey C Bamber; Richard Barr; Yi-Hong Chou; Hong Ding; Andre Farrokh; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Timothy J Hall; Kazutaka Nakashima; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri; Fritz Schafer; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Shinichi Suzuki; Masatoshi Kudo Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Jack X Q Pang; Scott Zimmer; Sophia Niu; Pam Crotty; Jenna Tracey; Faruq Pradhan; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Carla S Coffin; Steven J Heitman; Gilaad G Kaplan; Mark G Swain; Robert P Myers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 3.240