Literature DB >> 27786456

Crystal Engineering of Naphthalenediimide-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks: Structure-Dependent Lithium Storage.

Bingbing Tian1,2, Guo-Hong Ning2, Qiang Gao1,2, Li-Min Tan2, Wei Tang2, Zhongxin Chen2, Chenliang Su1,2, Kian Ping Loh1,2.   

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) possess great structural diversity because of the flexible design of linker groups and metal nodes. The structure-property correlation has been extensively investigated in areas like chiral catalysis, gas storage and absorption, water purification, energy storage, etc. However, the use of MOFs in lithium storage is hampered by stability issues, and how its porosity helps with battery performance is not well understood. Herein, through anion and thermodynamic control, we design a series of naphthalenediimide-based MOFs 1-4 that can be used for cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Complexation of the N,N'-di(4-pyridyl)-1,4,5,8-naphthalenediimide (DPNDI) ligand and CdX2 (X = NO3- or ClO4-) produces complexes MOFs 1 and 2 with a one-dimensional (1D) nonporous network and a porous, noninterpenetrated two-dimensional (2D) square-grid structure, respectively. With the DPNDI ligand and Co(NCS)2, a porous 1D MOF 3 as a kinetic product is obtained, while a nonporous, noninterpenetrated 2D square-grid structure MOF 4 as a thermodynamic product is formed. The performance of LIBs is largely affected by the stability and porosity of these MOFs. For instance, the initial charge-discharge curves of MOFs 1 and 2 show a specific capacity of ∼47 mA h g-1 with a capacity retention ratio of >70% during 50 cycles at 100 mA g-1, which is much better than that of MOFs 3 and 4. The better performances are assigned to the higher stability of Cd(II) MOFs compared to that of Co(II) MOFs during the electrochemical process, according to X-ray diffraction analysis. In addition, despite having the same Cd(II) node in the framework, MOF 2 exhibits a lithium-ion diffusion coefficient (DLi) larger than that of MOF 1 because of its higher porosity. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared analysis indicate that metal nodes in these MOFs remain intact and only the DPNDI ligand undergoes the revisible redox reaction during the lithiation-delithiation process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cathode materials; crystal engineering; lithium-ion batteries; lithium-ion diffusion coefficient (DLi); metal−organic frameworks; structural features

Year:  2016        PMID: 27786456     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b11772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  4 in total

Review 1.  Metal-organic framework based electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries: a review.

Authors:  Rimsha Mehek; Naseem Iqbal; Tayyaba Noor; M Zain Bin Amjad; Ghulam Ali; K Vignarooban; M Abdullah Khan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Synthesis and Characterization of LiFePO4-PANI Hybrid Material as Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Cesario Ajpi; Naviana Leiva; Max Vargas; Anders Lundblad; Göran Lindbergh; Saul Cabrera
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of poly[tris-(μ4-benzene-1,4-di-carboxyl-ato)tetra-kis-(di-methyl-formamide)-trinickel(II)]: a two-dimensional coordination network.

Authors:  Cesario Ajpi; Leopoldo Suescun; Naviana Leiva; Anders Lundblad; Göran Lindbergh; Saul Cabrera
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2019-11-08

4.  Enhancing Capacity and Stability of Anionic MOFs as Electrode Material by Cation Exchange.

Authors:  Oluseun Akintola; Patrick Gerlach; Christian T Plass; Andrea Balducci; Winfried Plass
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.221

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.