Literature DB >> 27785771

Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Actinic Keratosis: An Update.

Spencer M Vale1, Dane Hill1, Steven R Feldman2,3,4.   

Abstract

Actinic keratosis is one of the most common dermatological diagnoses worldwide, especially among the elderly, fair-skinned, and immunocompromised, and is associated with a risk of transformation to skin cancer. With actinic keratosis and skin cancer prevalence increasing as the aged population expands in the US, optimizing treatment strategies may produce cost savings for the healthcare system. Since the time of our last review in 2008, investigation of the economic considerations in treating actinic keratosis has advanced. To provide an update of treatment cost effectiveness and to review factors relating to the costs of care, we conducted a systematic review of pharmacoeconomic publications since December 2008. We identified 11 pharmacoeconomic studies, with one cost-of-treatment, five cost-effectiveness, and five cost-utility analyses. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was well tolerated and produced a favorable cosmetic outcome in most studies. Ingenol mebutate, the newest but most expensive topical field therapy, 5-fluorouracil, and PDT were the most cost-effective treatments in our review. Patient adherence to therapy and the management of adverse effects were significant contributors to treatment costs. In the US, treatment guidelines and formalized cost-effectiveness analyses for actinic keratosis are absent from the recent literature. Future pharmacoeconomic investigation will depend on up-to-date comparative efficacy data, as well as clarification of rates of, and management strategies for, adverse effects, therapeutic non-adherence, and lesion recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27785771     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0462-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  52 in total

1.  Patient-reported adherence and persistence to topical treatments for actinic keratosis: a longitudinal diary study.

Authors:  S Erntoft; J M Norlin; C Pollard; T L Diepgen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 2.  Dual mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate gel for topical treatment of actinic keratoses: rapid lesion necrosis followed by lesion-specific immune response.

Authors:  Robert H Rosen; Aditya K Gupta; Stephen K Tyring
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 3.  Interventions for actinic keratoses.

Authors:  Aditya K Gupta; Maryse Paquet; Elmer Villanueva; William Brintnell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Evidence- and consensus-based (S3) Guidelines for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis - International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum - Short version.

Authors:  R N Werner; E Stockfleth; S M Connolly; O Correia; R Erdmann; P Foley; A K Gupta; A Jacobs; H Kerl; H W Lim; G Martin; M Paquet; D M Pariser; S Rosumeck; H-J Röwert-Huber; A Sahota; O P Sangueza; S Shumack; B Sporbeck; N A Swanson; L Torezan; A Nast
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Cost effectiveness of imiquimod 5% cream compared with methyl aminolevulinate-based photodynamic therapy in the treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic actinic (solar) keratoses: a decision tree model.

Authors:  Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Real-life Data on Patient Characteristics, Cost and Effectiveness of Field-directed Treatment for Actinic Keratoses: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Margit C J van Rijsingen; Inge Seubring; Janneke P C Grutters; M Birgitte Maessen-Visch; Hans A C Alkemade; Remco van Doorn; Hans Groenewoud; Peter C M van de Kerkhof; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Marie-Jeanne P Gerritsen
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.437

7.  Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Ingenol Mebutate Versus Diclofenac 3% and Imiquimod 5% in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis in Spain.

Authors:  I Elías; N Ortega-Joaquín; P de la Cueva; L J Del Pozo; D Moreno-Ramírez; A Boada; M Aguilar; A Mirada; E Mosquera; C Gibbons; I Oyagüez
Journal:  Actas Dermosifiliogr       Date:  2016-04-26

Review 8.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating actinic keratosis.

Authors:  Marjorie V Neidecker; Mary Lynn Davis-Ajami; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  The natural history of actinic keratosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N Werner; A Sammain; R Erdmann; V Hartmann; E Stockfleth; A Nast
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 10.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic impact of high-cost drugs in Brazilian dermatology. Legal and financial aspects, and impact on clinical practice.

Authors:  Renan Tironi Giglio de Oliveira; Giovana Larissa Prado Leite Agostinho; Rubens Granja; Luiza Keiko M Oyafuso; Paulo Ricardo Criado
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 1.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.