Literature DB >> 27785565

Durum wheat particle size affects starch and protein digestion in vitro.

Giuseppina Mandalari1,2, Zara Merali3, Peter Ryden3, Simona Chessa1, Carlo Bisignano2, Davide Barreca2, Ersilia Bellocco2, Giuseppina Laganà2, Richard M Faulks1, Keith W Waldron4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The term bioaccessibility refers to the proportion of a nutrient released from a complex food matrix during digestion and, therefore, becoming potentially available for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. In the present study, we assessed the starch and protein bioaccessibility from a range of wheat endosperm products differing in particle size.
METHODS: Five porridge meals (size A, flour, mean particle size 0.11 mm, size B, small, mean particle size 0.38 mm, size C, semolina, mean particle size 1.01 mm, size D, medium, mean particle size 1.44 mm, size E, large, mean particle size 1.95 mm) with theoretically different postprandial glycaemic responses were subjected to oral processing in vitro, followed by simulated gastric and duodenal digestion.
RESULTS: A significant increase (P < 0.001) in starch degradation was observed in size A (52%) compared with size E (25%). Both sizes C and D gave less, although not significantly, digestible starch (32 and 28%, respectively). The glucose release significantly decreased as the particle size of the meal increased (92.16% detected for size A vs 47.39% for size E). In agreement with starch degradation and glucose release, size A gave the most digestible protein.
CONCLUSIONS: This data provide further evidence that, by decreasing the size of wheat endosperm, starch release and glycaemic response are enhanced. We also showed that protein bioaccessibility followed a similar trend as for starch digestion. Finally, these results support the hypothesis that different degrees of starch encapsulation elicit different blood glucose responses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycaemic response; In vitro models; Starch digestion; Wheat endosperm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27785565     DOI: 10.1007/s00394-016-1321-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nutr        ISSN: 1436-6207            Impact factor:   5.614


  21 in total

1.  A high-glycemic index, low-fiber breakfast affects the postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and ghrelin responses of patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Flávia M Silva; Caroline K Kramer; Daisy Crispim; Mirela J Azevedo
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Mastication and its influence on human salivary flow and alpha-amylase secretion.

Authors:  D A Mackie; R M Pangborn
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-03

Review 3.  Is glycaemic index (GI) a valid measure of carbohydrate quality?

Authors:  T M S Wolever
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Dietary carbohydrates and insulin action in humans.

Authors:  T M Wolever
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and intake of carbohydrate and rice in relation to risk of mortality from stroke and its subtypes in Japanese men and women.

Authors:  Shino Oba; Chisato Nagata; Kozue Nakamura; Kaori Fujii; Toshiaki Kawachi; Naoyoshi Takatsuka; Hiroyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.694

6.  A novel method for classifying starch digestion by modelling the amylolysis of plant foods using first-order enzyme kinetic principles.

Authors:  Cathrina H Edwards; Frederick J Warren; Peter J Milligan; Peter J Butterworth; Peter R Ellis
Journal:  Food Funct       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.396

Review 7.  Glycemic index: overview of implications in health and disease.

Authors:  David J A Jenkins; Cyril W C Kendall; Livia S A Augustin; Silvia Franceschi; Maryam Hamidi; Augustine Marchie; Alexandra L Jenkins; Mette Axelsen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Physiological effects of retrograded, alpha-amylase-resistant cornstarch in rats.

Authors:  J M Gee; R M Faulks; I T Johnson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Glycemic responses, appetite ratings and gastrointestinal hormone responses of most common breads consumed in Spain. A randomized control trial in healthy humans.

Authors:  Carolina Gonzalez-Anton; Maria C Rico; Estefania Sanchez-Rodriguez; Maria D Ruiz-Lopez; Angel Gil; Maria D Mesa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants.

Authors:  Cathrina H Edwards; Myriam Ml Grundy; Terri Grassby; Dafni Vasilopoulou; Gary S Frost; Peter J Butterworth; Sarah Ee Berry; Jeremy Sanderson; Peter R Ellis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modest improvement in CVD risk markers in older adults following quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) consumption: a randomized-controlled crossover study with a novel food product.

Authors:  L Kirsty Pourshahidi; Eduardo Caballero; Alejandro Osses; Barry W Hyland; Nigel G Ternan; Chris I R Gill
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.