Jong-Hun Ji1, Jae-Jung Jeong1, Young-Yul Kim1, Se-Won Lee1, Do-Yeol Kim2, Sang-Eun Park3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daeheung-ro 64, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 302-823, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daeheung-ro 64, Jung-gu, Daejeon, 302-823, Republic of Korea. rockwood74@naver.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for the GT fractures of the shoulder joint. METHODS: From March 2008 to July 2013, we performed arthroscopic suture bridge repair of the GT fractures displaced more than 5 mm superiorly or posteriorly, but less than 2 cm in 40 cases [20 men, 20 women; mean age, 56 (27-80) years] with the average 32 (24-48) months follow-up. At the final follow-up, clinical (ASES, UCLA, SST, KSS score and range of motions) and radiological outcomes using post-operative MRI or CT scan were evaluated. Associated injuries occurred in 21 cases (52.5%): 8 rotator cuff tears; 7 SLAP lesions; 3 glenoid rim fractures; 3 Bankart lesions; 5 biceps tendon tears; 1 partial subscapularis tear; 1 combined subscapularis and biceps tendon tear, and 1 brachial plexus injury. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean VAS score improved from 7 to 1; ASES, to 92; UCLA, to 32; KSS, to 90; and SST, to 10. Mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation at the back were improved to 157°, 157°, 37° and T11, respectively. Mean residual superior and posterior displacement of the fracture was 0 (range -5 to 3.3) mm and 0.1 (-5.5 to 3.2) mm, respectively, compared to pre-operative displacement of 4.9 (0-14) mm and 4.5 (0-20) mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Complications included anchor protrusion in five cases. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture bridge repair was useful for the treatment of displaced GT fractures with or without comminution and the management of the combined lesions. At the final follow-up, meaningful remodeling of the GT fracture and satisfactory clinical outcomes could be achieved.
PURPOSE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for the GT fractures of the shoulder joint. METHODS: From March 2008 to July 2013, we performed arthroscopic suture bridge repair of the GT fractures displaced more than 5 mm superiorly or posteriorly, but less than 2 cm in 40 cases [20 men, 20 women; mean age, 56 (27-80) years] with the average 32 (24-48) months follow-up. At the final follow-up, clinical (ASES, UCLA, SST, KSS score and range of motions) and radiological outcomes using post-operative MRI or CT scan were evaluated. Associated injuries occurred in 21 cases (52.5%): 8 rotator cuff tears; 7 SLAP lesions; 3 glenoid rim fractures; 3 Bankart lesions; 5 biceps tendon tears; 1 partial subscapularis tear; 1 combined subscapularis and biceps tendon tear, and 1 brachial plexus injury. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean VAS score improved from 7 to 1; ASES, to 92; UCLA, to 32; KSS, to 90; and SST, to 10. Mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation at the back were improved to 157°, 157°, 37° and T11, respectively. Mean residual superior and posterior displacement of the fracture was 0 (range -5 to 3.3) mm and 0.1 (-5.5 to 3.2) mm, respectively, compared to pre-operative displacement of 4.9 (0-14) mm and 4.5 (0-20) mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Complications included anchor protrusion in five cases. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture bridge repair was useful for the treatment of displaced GT fractures with or without comminution and the management of the combined lesions. At the final follow-up, meaningful remodeling of the GT fracture and satisfactory clinical outcomes could be achieved.