Beata Sas-Korczyńska1, Elżbieta Łuczyńska2, Wojciech Kamzol3, Andrzej Sokołowski4. 1. Clinic of Oncology and Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Garncarska 11, 31-115, Cracow, Poland. z5korczy@cyf-kr.edu.pl. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Garncarska 11, 31-115, Cracow, Poland. 3. Clinic of Oncology and Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Garncarska 11, 31-115, Cracow, Poland. 4. Department of Statistics, Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27, 31-510, Cracow, Poland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The most effective therapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS SCLC) seems to be chemotherapy (using platinum-based regimens) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), which is followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysed group comprised 217 patients who received combined treatment for LS SCLC, i.e. chemotherapy (according to cisplatin and etoposide schedule) and TRT (concurrent in 101 and sequential in 116 patients). The influence of chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) schedule on treatment results (frequency of complete response, survival rates, and incidence of treatment failure and complications) was evaluated, and the frequency and severity of pulmonary complications were analysed to identify risk factors. RESULTS: The 5‑year survival rates in concurrent vs. sequential ChT-RT schedules were 27.3 vs. 11.7% (overall) and 28 vs. 14.3% (disease-free). The frequencies of adverse events in relation to concurrent vs. sequential therapy were 85.1 vs. 9.5% (haematological complications) and 58.4 vs. 38.8% (pulmonary fibrosis), respectively. It was found that concurrent ChT-RT (hazard ratio, HR 2.75), a total dose equal to or more than 54 Gy (HR 2.55), the presence of haematological complications (HR 1.89) and a lung volume receiving a dose equal to or greater than 20 Gy exceeding 31% (HR 1.06) were the risk factors for pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary complications after ChT-RT developed in 82% of patients treated for LS SCLC. In comparison to the sequential approach, concurrent ChT-RT had a positive effect on treatment outcome. However, this is a factor that can impair treatment tolerance, which manifests in the appearance of side effects.
INTRODUCTION: The most effective therapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS SCLC) seems to be chemotherapy (using platinum-based regimens) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), which is followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysed group comprised 217 patients who received combined treatment for LS SCLC, i.e. chemotherapy (according to cisplatin and etoposide schedule) and TRT (concurrent in 101 and sequential in 116 patients). The influence of chemoradiotherapy (ChT-RT) schedule on treatment results (frequency of complete response, survival rates, and incidence of treatment failure and complications) was evaluated, and the frequency and severity of pulmonary complications were analysed to identify risk factors. RESULTS: The 5‑year survival rates in concurrent vs. sequential ChT-RT schedules were 27.3 vs. 11.7% (overall) and 28 vs. 14.3% (disease-free). The frequencies of adverse events in relation to concurrent vs. sequential therapy were 85.1 vs. 9.5% (haematological complications) and 58.4 vs. 38.8% (pulmonary fibrosis), respectively. It was found that concurrent ChT-RT (hazard ratio, HR 2.75), a total dose equal to or more than 54 Gy (HR 2.55), the presence of haematological complications (HR 1.89) and a lung volume receiving a dose equal to or greater than 20 Gy exceeding 31% (HR 1.06) were the risk factors for pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION:Pulmonary complications after ChT-RT developed in 82% of patients treated for LS SCLC. In comparison to the sequential approach, concurrent ChT-RT had a positive effect on treatment outcome. However, this is a factor that can impair treatment tolerance, which manifests in the appearance of side effects.
Authors: Daniel B Fried; David E Morris; Charles Poole; Julian G Rosenman; Jan S Halle; Frank C Detterbeck; Thomas A Hensing; Mark A Socinski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Manapov; S Klöcking; M Niyazi; C Belka; G Hildebrandt; R Fietkau; G Klautke Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Stephen G Spiro; Lindsay E James; Robin M Rudd; Colin W Trask; Jeffrey S Tobias; Michael Snee; David Gilligan; Philip A Murray; Mary Carmen Ruiz de Elvira; Katy M O'Donnell; Nicole H Gower; Peter G Harper; Allan K Hackshaw Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Patrick Möbius; Raimund H M Preidl; Manuel Weber; Kerstin Amann; Friedrich W Neukam; Falk Wehrhan Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 3.621