Literature DB >> 27785383

Development of microsatellite markers for the clonal shrub Orixa japonica (Rutaceae) using 454 sequencing.

Ichiro Tamaki1, Suzuki Setsuko2, Kyoko Sugai3, Nao Yanagisawa1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Microsatellite markers were developed for a dioecious shrub, Orixa japonica (Rutaceae). Because O. japonica vigorously propagates by vegetative growth, microsatellite markers can be used to identify clonal relationships among its ramets. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixteen polymorphic microsatellite markers were identified by 454 next-generation sequencing. The number of alleles and expected heterozygosity for each locus among four populations ranged from two to 10 and from 0.140 to 0.875, respectively. Five of the 16 loci showed a low null allele frequency. Because Orixa is a monotypic genus, cross-amplification in a consubfamilial species, Skimmia japonica, was tested, and only one locus showed polymorphism.
CONCLUSIONS: These microsatellite markers developed for O. japonica contribute to clone identification for studies examining the clonal structure and true sex ratio in the wild. Moreover, five markers that have a low null allele frequency can also be used for estimating mating systems or performing parentage analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orixa; Rutaceae; clonal structure; dioecious plant; next-generation sequencing; sex ratio

Year:  2016        PMID: 27785383      PMCID: PMC5077282          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1600066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Orixa japonica Thunb. (Rutaceae) is a deciduous dioecious shrub known from China, Korea, and Japan; it is the only known species within the genus Orixa Thunb. The species propagates asexually by sprouting, layering, and root suckering and forms a large genet. Although O. japonica can also reproduce sexually via entomophilous flowers, its seedlings are scarce in the wild. The balance between sexual and asexual reproduction is an interesting theme related to the evolution of sexual reproduction (Obeso, 2002). In dioecious clonal plants, there are sexual differences in clonal growth, and these differences contribute to the sex ratio of the population (Escarre and Houssard, 1991). Orixa japonica is also an important plant for medicinal use (Kang et al., 2011). Identification and management of individual plants that are of medical benefit are important and require accurate clone identification. In this study, we developed 16 microsatellite markers to provide a useful tool for clone identification of O. japonica, to examine the species’ clonal structure and true sex ratio in the wild, and to manage lineages within breeding programs examining the medicinal use of O. japonica.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA of O. japonica was extracted from a fresh leaf collected from Yoro, Gifu, Japan, using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and a voucher specimen of this sample was deposited in the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute herbarium, Japan (accession no. TF-K11-0215) (Appendix 1). Multiplex identifier (MID) tags were used to multiplex the extracted DNA of O. japonica and other species. These samples were then pooled and pyrosequenced using a 454 GS Junior System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The raw data were demultiplexed and MID tags were removed from the reads. The de novo sequencing produced 73,267 reads with an average length of 427 bp. The identification of microsatellite regions and design of primer pairs from the sequence data were performed with the program QDD 2.1 (Meglécz et al., 2010). Microsatellite regions bordering sequences with more than five repeats of di- to hexanucleotide motifs and a minimum sequence length of 80 bp were selected. According to these criteria, 2846 reads contained microsatellite loci. To eliminate redundancy, the similarity of sequences containing microsatellite regions was detected by all-against-all BLAST searching. Subsequently, 1168 reads were selected from the whole set of sequences containing microsatellites. PCR primer pairs were designed using Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999) implemented in QDD 2.1 (Meglécz et al., 2010). Finally, 803 microsatellite primer pairs were designed. Amplification and polymorphism tests were performed for 30 selected primer pairs; we selected these primer pairs on the basis of their having single repeat motifs of di- and trinucleotides, with 10–14 repeats. All forward primers were fluorescently labeled at the 5′-end with one of four different tail sequences (A to D) shown in Table 1, according to the method by Blacket et al. (2012). All reverse primers were attached to a 5′-GTT-3′ sequence at the 5′-end of the sequence to reduce stuttering due to the addition of nontemplated adenine base pairs by Taq DNA polymerase (Brownstein et al., 1996).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 16 nuclear microsatellite loci isolated from Orixa japonica.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifTa (°C)Tail sequenceaAllele size range (bp)GenBank accession no.
Oj013F: AAATGCAACATTACATTGGTAACAT(AAT)1157Tag-A1230–274LC146669
R: AGCAGCTTTCGATGTGTTCTAAAT
Oj078F: GTGAACTTCATCCACGCTCTAAA(AT)1260Tag-C2210–236LC146670
R: CTCTGTCTTCTGGCTAGTCGCT
Oj125F: CTTTGTTGCAGTATATGTCGTCGT(AT)1057Tag-A1212–229LC146664
R: GTTGGTAAGAGATCTGCAAATTGA
Oj185F: AGTGCATAATCACCAAACAAATGA(AT)1060Tag-A3309–318LC146673
R: TCATAATGGTCTCCCAATAGTCCT
Oj196F: ATGGCCTTACATTAGTGTGTCCTC(AT)1057Tag-C1222–232LC146672
R: TCCCTCCATTACATTTATGAAATTCT
Oj206F: AAGAAATAATTTATCACCGAGCCA(AC)1057Tag-B1232–246LC146661
R: CATTTCTTATATGGACGTCTGCAA
Oj214F: TCGTAAGGAAAGAACTTTGGAAAC(AT)1060Tag-A3160–175LC146663
R: CAGAATATGGTCAACCAATAGACG
Oj365F: TCTCAATTGCATACATTCTCATCC(AT)1160Tag-D3212–247LC146665
R: AGTCTCCTTCACATACCCACATTC
Oj413F: ACCAAGGTAGTTAGCACAAAGTGG(AAC)1360Tag-B2283–370LC146666
R: ATAGATGCGATAGAGGCATTAGGA
Oj437F: TGCTATATTGCAGTAACAAATAAGTGC(AC)1260Tag-B3127–139LC146671
R: CTGCAGCAACAAACAAGTGAAA
Oj478F: TAAGTTGAGGATTCCCTCATTAAA(AT)1060Tag-C3303–311LC146662
R: TTTGTCTGTCATGTGTCTGTCATATT
Oj509F: ATTTGCAACCCTCGGATTAGAATA(AG)1360Tag-D2149–165LC146668
R: TAACATATTCGATCTGCTTGTCCC
Oj549F: GATTAATGGAAATTTGAGACGGAA(AG)1060Tag-C2138–144LC146667
R: GTTGGATACTCTCTCCCACACACT
Oj598F: CTTCAAGATGAGACCATTTCAACA(AG)1060Tag-B2166–182LC146659
R: CTTTATGAACTATTGGGCCTGAGA
Oj609F: ATATCCACATGACGCGTTAAGAA(AT)1060Tag-A397–114LC146658
R: AACCATTACAAATTAAATCTTCCAAA
Oj661F: AAGATATTGACCATAATTGCCCAC(AG)1060Tag-C2279–280LC146660
R: TATGTTTGCACTAAGCACAGTCGT

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

Tail sequences correspond to those in Blacket et al. (2012). Superscript numbers indicate the same multiplex PCR set.

Characteristics of 16 nuclear microsatellite loci isolated from Orixa japonica. Note: Ta = annealing temperature. Tail sequences correspond to those in Blacket et al. (2012). Superscript numbers indicate the same multiplex PCR set. To evaluate polymorphisms in these markers using population samples, leaves were sampled from 106 individuals from four populations (Appendix 1). Because Orixa is a monotypic genus, to evaluate the cross-amplification potential of these markers, 16 individuals of Skimmia japonica Thunb., which is a consubfamilial species, were also sampled (Appendix 1). Although Skimmia has previously been classified into subfamily Toddalioideae, Toddalioideae is now merged into subfamily Rutoideae (Thorne, 2000), into which O. japonica is classified, and Skimmia forms a sister group to O. japonica on the phylogenetic trees constructed by internal transcribed spacer and/or chloroplast sequences (Poon et al., 2007; Salvo et al., 2008). Sampled leaves were dried with silica gel and stored at room temperature until DNA extraction. Leaves were pulverized using a mortar and pestle. Pulverized leaves were washed more than twice using HEPES buffer (Setoguchi and Ohba, 1995), and then the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method was used to extract total DNA (Murray and Thompson, 1980). PCR was performed in a final volume of 5 μL, containing 2.5 μL of 2× Type-it Multiplex PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN), 0.1 μM forward primers, 0.2 μM reverse primers, 0.1 μM fluorescently tagged universal primers, and 10 ng DNA template. Reactions were performed with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C or 60°C for 90 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and finally 60°C for 30 min using a P × 2 Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The PCR products were electrophoresed using an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA), and fragment sizes were determined using GeneMapper version 4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Sixteen loci out of 30 showed clear amplification, with a single band for each allele. For each of these 16 loci, the number of alleles (A), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), fixation index (FIS), and null allele frequency were calculated using INEst 1.1 (Chybicki and Burczyk, 2009). Deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested at each locus by a randomization test implemented in FSTAT 2.9.3 (Goudet, 1995). The HWE significance level was evaluated after Bonferroni correction for each population. Among those 16 loci across the four populations, 132 alleles were detected. Excluding the Oj661 locus from the Mugi population, all other loci in each of the four populations showed polymorphism (Table 2). For these polymorphic loci, A ranged from two to 10, Ho from 0.000 to 0.767, He from 0.140 to 0.875, FIS from −0.260 to 1.000, and the null allele frequency from 0.029 to 0.637. Five loci (Oj125, Oj437, Oj509, Oj549, and Oj598) did not significantly deviate from HWE over all the populations. Seven out of 16 loci did not amplify in S. japonica (Table 2). Among the remaining nine loci, eight loci were monomorphic and thus only one locus, Oj598, showed polymorphism.
Table 2.

Genetic properties of 16 polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci in four populations of Orixa japonica and one population of Skimmia japonica.

Orixa japonica
Ibuki (N = 30)Neo (N = 30)Miyama (N = 19)Mugi (N = 27)Skimmia japonica
LocusAHoHeFISaPIDNullAHoHeFISaPIDNullAHoHeFISaPIDNullAHoHeFISaPIDNullAHoHeFISPIDNull
Oj01390.3330.8750.619***0.0690.300 ± 0.066100.6330.8700.272**0.0700.127 ± 0.05080.3680.8070.543***0.1710.262 ± 0.12170.2220.7810.716***0.1510.423 ± 0.124
Oj07880.6670.8420.2090.0940.072 ± 0.04650.3000.7550.603***0.1630.315 ± 0.07160.7370.720−0.0240.2760.041 ± 0.03770.6300.7870.2000.1470.075 ± 0.048
Oj12560.6670.6710.0060.2530.038 ± 0.03380.7670.8290.0750.1030.045 ± 0.03360.3680.5730.3570.4370.105 ± 0.07080.6670.7980.1650.1370.055 ± 0.04210.0000.000
Oj18550.0670.7030.905***0.2180.611 ± 0.07930.1670.6470.742***0.3020.403 ± 0.08340.0530.7720.932***0.2240.476 ± 0.08650.0370.7810.953***0.1580.495 ± 0.072
Oj19630.1000.3580.720**0.6470.192 ± 0.08120.2000.4270.5320.5970.161 ± 0.07830.0000.4891.000***0.5890.309 ± 0.09830.1110.5650.804***0.3910.376 ± 0.08210.0000.000
Oj20660.3000.6630.548***0.2560.158 ± 0.07260.5670.6280.0980.2850.065 ± 0.04560.1580.7030.775***0.2940.295 ± 0.08550.4820.7210.3320.2240.102 ± 0.06210.0000.000
Oj21480.3670.8330.560***0.1000.206 ± 0.06360.2330.3940.4080.5700.126 ± 0.06740.3680.4420.1670.6290.085 ± 0.06540.5930.6900.1420.2550.071 ± 0.04910.0000.000
Oj36530.0000.2461.000***0.8020.277 ± 0.08670.2330.5250.555***0.3700.236 ± 0.07040.2630.4600.4270.6300.149 ± 0.08260.1480.5120.711***0.4190.245 ± 0.07610.0000.000
Oj41360.0330.7670.957***0.1530.592 ± 0.06960.0330.5700.942***0.3350.637 ± 0.14750.0000.8141.000***0.1720.527 ± 0.08240.1110.7230.846***0.2300.522 ± 0.079
Oj43770.6670.7430.1030.1790.042 ± 0.03540.5670.5670.0010.3770.053 ± 0.04140.7370.636−0.1590.3980.041 ± 0.03740.4070.4480.0910.5280.078 ± 0.05410.0000.000
Oj47840.2330.6480.640***0.2630.312 ± 0.07750.3670.6660.449***0.2300.220 ± 0.06740.3160.7500.579***0.2390.326 ± 0.10530.1480.3280.548*0.6950.226 ± 0.085
Oj50970.7330.732−0.0020.1760.033 ± 0.02960.7000.589−0.1890.3150.029 ± 0.02650.4740.4780.0090.5730.055 ± 0.04970.7410.728−0.0180.1970.032 ± 0.029
Oj54940.4670.5150.0930.4200.054 ± 0.04430.3330.3770.1170.6230.087 ± 0.05730.2630.3640.2770.7690.108 ± 0.07620.1480.140−0.0601.0550.075 ± 0.062
Oj59850.5000.6840.2690.2470.091 ± 0.05660.6000.584−0.0280.3560.039 ± 0.03440.5790.460−0.2600.6300.045 ± 0.04140.5930.7040.1590.2390.061 ± 0.04630.5000.6750.2600.4250.089 ± 0.069
Oj60950.2670.5380.504***0.3640.238 ± 0.07740.3000.5760.479**0.3430.191 ± 0.13340.3160.3700.1460.7480.093 ± 0.06820.0370.1710.7840.9930.160 ± 0.08610.0000.000
Oj66120.0330.4400.924***0.5850.260 ± 0.08720.0000.4881.000***0.5460.311 ± 0.08520.0000.3981.000***0.7770.278 ± 0.10510.0000.00010.0000.000

Note: — = no amplification or values cannot be calculated due to monomorphic loci; A = number of alleles; FIS = fixation index; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = number of individuals sampled; Null = null allele frequency; PID = probability of genetic identity.

Significance of departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Genetic properties of 16 polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci in four populations of Orixa japonica and one population of Skimmia japonica. Note: — = no amplification or values cannot be calculated due to monomorphic loci; A = number of alleles; FIS = fixation index; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; N = number of individuals sampled; Null = null allele frequency; PID = probability of genetic identity. Significance of departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed the first set of microsatellite markers for O. japonica. These 16 microsatellite markers showed a high level of polymorphism and can be used to identify clones. Moreover, because five of 16 markers (Oj125, Oj437, Oj509, Oj549, and Oj598) did not significantly deviate from HWE and their null allele frequencies were relatively low, these markers can also be used for estimating mating systems or performing parentage analysis. These markers will help examine the clonal structure and true sex ratio in the wild and manage lineages in the breeding program for medicinal use of O. japonica.
Appendix 1.

Voucher and location information for the Orixa japonica and Skimmia japonica populations used in this study. All vouchers were deposited in the herbarium of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan.

SpeciesPopulation nameVoucher no.No. of vouchers collectedNo. of individuals sampledLatitude (°N)Longitude (°E)
Orixa japonica Thunb.YoroaTF-K11-02151135.27800136.52940
O. japonicaIbukiTF-HDT-0000123035.39852136.39745
TF-HDT-00002
O. japonicaNeoTF-HDT-0000313035.66922136.54450
O. japonicaMiyamaTF-HDT-0000421935.63680136.68852
TF-HDT-00005
O. japonicaMugiTF-HDT-0000632735.59874137.00420
TF-HDT-00007
TF-HDT-00008
Skimmia japonica Thunb.FukubeTF-HDT-00001021635.64427136.89011
TF-HDT-000011

This sample was used only for designing the primer sequences and was not included in the population analysis.

  7 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments--an efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence.

Authors:  M J Blacket; C Robin; R T Good; S F Lee; A D Miller
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects.

Authors:  Emese Meglécz; Caroline Costedoat; Vincent Dubut; André Gilles; Thibaut Malausa; Nicolas Pech; Jean-François Martin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Phylogenetic relationships of Ruteae (Rutaceae): new evidence from the chloroplast genome and comparisons with non-molecular data.

Authors:  Gabriele Salvo; Gianluigi Bacchetta; Farrokh Ghahremaninejad; Elena Conti
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

Authors:  M G Murray; W F Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping.

Authors:  M J Brownstein; J D Carpten; J R Smith
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.993

7.  Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  Igor J Chybicki; Jaroslaw Burczyk
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 2.645

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.