Literature DB >> 27784176

On Stabilizing the Variance of Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity Time Series.

William Hedley Thompson1, Peter Fransson1.   

Abstract

Assessment of dynamic functional brain connectivity based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is an increasingly popular strategy to investigate temporal dynamics of the brain's large-scale network architecture. Current practice when deriving connectivity estimates over time is to use the Fisher transformation, which aims to stabilize the variance of correlation values that fluctuate around varying true correlation values. It is, however, unclear how well the stabilization of signal variance performed by the Fisher transformation works for each connectivity time series, when the true correlation is assumed to be fluctuating. This is of importance because many subsequent analyses either assume or perform better when the time series have stable variance or adheres to an approximate Gaussian distribution. In this article, using simulations and analysis of resting-state fMRI data, we analyze the effect of applying different variance stabilization strategies on connectivity time series. We focus our investigation on the Fisher transformation, the Box-Cox (BC) transformation and an approach that combines both transformations. Our results show that, if the intention of stabilizing the variance is to use metrics on the time series, where stable variance or a Gaussian distribution is desired (e.g., clustering), the Fisher transformation is not optimal and may even skew connectivity time series away from being Gaussian. Furthermore, we show that the suboptimal performance of the Fisher transformation can be substantially improved by including an additional BC transformation after the dynamic functional connectivity time series has been Fisher transformed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Box–Cox transformation; Fisher transformation; dynamic functional connectivity; fMRI; time series; variance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27784176      PMCID: PMC5175424          DOI: 10.1089/brain.2016.0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Connect        ISSN: 2158-0014


  34 in total

1.  How default is the default mode of brain function? Further evidence from intrinsic BOLD signal fluctuations.

Authors:  Peter Fransson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.

Authors:  Yashar Behzadi; Khaled Restom; Joy Liau; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Towards a statistical test for functional connectivity dynamics.

Authors:  Andrew Zalesky; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest.

Authors:  Nora Leonardi; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  EEG correlates of time-varying BOLD functional connectivity.

Authors:  Catie Chang; Zhongming Liu; Michael C Chen; Xiao Liu; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming.

Authors:  Aaron Kucyi; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Alexander Schaefer; Daniel S Margulies; Gabriele Lohmann; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Jonathan Smallwood; Stefan J Kiebel; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Bursty properties revealed in large-scale brain networks with a point-based method for dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  William Hedley Thompson; Peter Fransson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Damaraju; E A Allen; A Belger; J M Ford; S McEwen; D H Mathalon; B A Mueller; G D Pearlson; S G Potkin; A Preda; J A Turner; J G Vaidya; T G van Erp; V D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Disentangling dynamic networks: Separated and joint expressions of functional connectivity patterns in time.

Authors:  Nora Leonardi; William R Shirer; Michael D Greicius; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  14 in total

1.  Instability of brain connectivity during nonrapid eye movement sleep reflects altered properties of information integration.

Authors:  Yi-Chia Kung; Chia-Wei Li; Shuo Chen; Sharon Chia-Ju Chen; Chun-Yi Z Lo; Timothy J Lane; Bharat Biswal; Changwei W Wu; Ching-Po Lin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Investigating time-varying functional connectivity derived from the Jackknife Correlation method for distinguishing between emotions in fMRI data.

Authors:  Shabnam Ghahari; Naemeh Farahani; Emad Fatemizadeh; Ali Motie Nasrabadi
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Intrinsic functional connectivity variance and state-specific under-connectivity in autism.

Authors:  Heng Chen; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Xujun Duan; Huafu Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Brain network segregation and integration during painful thermal stimulation.

Authors:  Gránit Kastrati; William H Thompson; Björn Schiffler; Peter Fransson; Karin B Jensen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Whole-brain connectivity dynamics reflect both task-specific and individual-specific modulation: A multitask study.

Authors:  Hua Xie; Vince D Calhoun; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Eswar Damaraju; Robyn Miller; Peter A Bandettini; Sunanda Mitra
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Diagnostic power of resting-state fMRI for detection of network connectivity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Buhari Ibrahim; Subapriya Suppiah; Normala Ibrahim; Mazlyfarina Mohamad; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Nisha Syed Nasser; M Iqbal Saripan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Increased Global-Brain Functional Connectivity Is Associated with Dyslipidemia and Cognitive Impairment in First-Episode, Drug-Naive Patients with Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Pan Pan; Yan Qiu; Ziwei Teng; Sujuan Li; Jing Huang; Hui Xiang; Hui Tang; Jindong Chen; Chujun Wu; Kun Jin; Bolun Wang; Feng Liu; Haishan Wu; Wenbin Guo
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Bursty properties revealed in large-scale brain networks with a point-based method for dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  William Hedley Thompson; Peter Fransson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Simulations to benchmark time-varying connectivity methods for fMRI.

Authors:  William Hedley Thompson; Craig Geoffrey Richter; Pontus Plavén-Sigray; Peter Fransson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Inter-individual body mass variations relate to fractionated functional brain hierarchies.

Authors:  Bo-Yong Park; Hyunjin Park; Filip Morys; Mansu Kim; Kyoungseob Byeon; Hyebin Lee; Se-Hong Kim; Sofie L Valk; Alain Dagher; Boris C Bernhardt
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.