Literature DB >> 27783931

Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study.

C Buratti1, F Fantozzi2, M Barbanera2, E Lascaro2, M Chiorri3, L Cecchini3.   

Abstract

Beef cattle production is a widespread activity in Italy in the agricultural field and determines an important impact on environment and resources consumption. Carbon footprint evaluation is thus necessary to evaluate the contributions of the different stages and the possible improvements of the production chain. In this study, two typical Italian beef production systems, a conventional and an organic one are investigated in order to evaluate the greenhouse gas emissions from "cradle to gate farm" by a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach; the carbon footprint (CF) per 1kg of live weight meat is calculated. The contributions from feed production, enteric fermentation, and manure management are taken into account, in order to compare the life cycle of the two productions; also the carbon balance in soil is evaluated, in order to verify the impact in a life cycle perspective. The results of CF calculation of the two farms show that organic system (24.62kgCO2eq/kg live weight) produce more GHG emissions than the conventional one (18.21kgCO2eq/kg live weight) and that the enteric fermentation is the more heavy contribution, with a range of 50-54% of the global CF value. Improvements of the production chain could be realized by accurate feeding strategies, in order to obtain reduction of methane emissions from enteric digestion of cattles.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon footprint; GHG emissions; Life Cycle Assessment; Livestock; Meat production

Year:  2016        PMID: 27783931     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  Agriculture, dairy and fishery farming practices and greenhouse gas emission footprint: a strategic appraisal for mitigation.

Authors:  Avijit Ghosh; Sukanya Misra; Ranjan Bhattacharyya; Abhijit Sarkar; Amit Kumar Singh; Vikas Chandra Tyagi; Ram Vinod Kumar; Vijay Singh Meena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Overnutrition is a significant component of food waste and has a large environmental impact.

Authors:  Silvio Franco; Marco Barbanera; Roberto Moscetti; Clara Cicatiello; Luca Secondi; Riccardo Massantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Milk Quality and Carbon Footprint Indicators of Dairy Sheep Farms Depend on Grazing Level and Identify the Different Management Systems.

Authors:  Javier Plaza; Isabel Revilla; Jaime Nieto; Cristina Hidalgo; Mario Sánchez-García; Carlos Palacios
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Distributions of emissions intensity for individual beef cattle reared on pasture-based production systems.

Authors:  G A McAuliffe; T Takahashi; R J Orr; P Harris; M R F Lee
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 9.297

5.  Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Lynch
Journal:  Environ Impact Assess Rev       Date:  2019-02-14

6.  Organic Farming as a Strategy to Reduce Carbon Footprint in Dehesa Agroecosystems: A Case Study Comparing Different Livestock Products.

Authors:  Andrés Horrillo; Paula Gaspar; Miguel Escribano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.